The Lounge, lounge.moviecodec.com
Your Ad Here
Search
FAQ
Login
Register
Pages: << First < Previous 1 [2] 3 4 5 Next > Last >>

Bookmark and Share
Site Sections Suggestion

The Lounge dropdown Forums Index > Feedback dropdown Site Sections Suggestion Page Navigation Page Navigation
[Quote] #21
05 Apr 2009 01:02 pm
Joined: 17 Oct 2008
Posts: 4,336
OFFLINE
Conan
Conan
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 38thumbs-up

Cid wrote:

Dream of the Endless wrote:

Cid wrote:

Dream of the Endless wrote: No, I don’t want to be moderating about Sarah Palin and Evolution in the same section...



It’s honestly for the best interest of the site.


They are too un-related to be merged.
A new section called 'world and politics' or something would be better.



Politics and religion are mixed all the time. As it stands, the politics section is far too inactive to stay on it’s on. I mean... 20 topics since January 2009? That’s kind of pathetic and makes the forum look more inactive than it really is. And we can’t just keep throwing everything into Off-Topic.


Meh, either way, Politics forum has got to go.


__________________


[Quote] #22
05 Apr 2009 01:08 pm
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 27,086
ONLINE
Indalecio
Indalecio
Leader of the Wise men
Rep: 103thumbs-up

With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.


__________________

[Quote] #23
05 Apr 2009 02:03 pm
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 52,860
ONLINE
Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Dreacon
Knight of Vermilion
Rep: 71thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.


__________________


[Quote] #24
05 Apr 2009 03:47 pm
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 49,513
OFFLINE
Cid
Cid
HOLY SHIT IT WAS LUPUS!
Rep: 112thumbs-up

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.


__________________



Rise of Shinra

[Quote] #25
05 Apr 2009 03:52 pm
Joined: 09 Nov 2008
Posts: 3,224
OFFLINE
Geass
Geass
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 27thumbs-up

Cid wrote:

Archangel Azrael wrote:

Cid wrote: Guys, let’s not forget that we’re trying to clear up inactive sections of the site here. Adding even more sections is bad. >_>


we should make an anime and lit mixed section... that would be popular, and it would just take the place of the lit section, and keep it lol im smart you dont have to tell me tounge



Anime can be discussed in the television forum already. Manga is usually discussed in the same threads as anime. *scratches head*

Basically, what I’m proposing here... Is that we kill off the secions that, when you look on their first page, you get topics dating back several months.

Thinking about it, literature should be merged into Arts/creativity as books can be considered art... Right?

no,unless they have pictures but,who reads books with pictures in them around our age?Just leave the Literature Section alone for right now.


__________________

Last edited 05 Apr 2009 03:53 pm by Geass
[Quote] #26
05 Apr 2009 04:00 pm
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 52,860
ONLINE
Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Dreacon
Knight of Vermilion
Rep: 71thumbs-up

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


__________________


[Quote] #27
05 Apr 2009 04:03 pm
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 27,086
ONLINE
Indalecio
Indalecio
Leader of the Wise men
Rep: 103thumbs-up

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.


__________________

[Quote] #28
05 Apr 2009 04:04 pm
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 49,513
OFFLINE
Cid
Cid
HOLY SHIT IT WAS LUPUS!
Rep: 112thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.




True.

And literature section needs to go Geass. Look at it, last topic on page one is from nearly 2 months ago.


__________________



Rise of Shinra

[Quote] #29
05 Apr 2009 04:05 pm
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 52,860
ONLINE
Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Dreacon
Knight of Vermilion
Rep: 71thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


__________________


[Quote] #30
05 Apr 2009 04:06 pm
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 27,086
ONLINE
Indalecio
Indalecio
Leader of the Wise men
Rep: 103thumbs-up

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.


__________________

[Quote] #31
05 Apr 2009 04:07 pm
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 49,513
OFFLINE
Cid
Cid
HOLY SHIT IT WAS LUPUS!
Rep: 112thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



True again


__________________



Rise of Shinra

[Quote] #32
05 Apr 2009 04:09 pm
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 52,860
ONLINE
Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Dreacon
Knight of Vermilion
Rep: 71thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.


__________________


[Quote] #33
05 Apr 2009 04:11 pm
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 49,513
OFFLINE
Cid
Cid
HOLY SHIT IT WAS LUPUS!
Rep: 112thumbs-up

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.



RP topics would be quite searched as well. You honestly never know.


__________________



Rise of Shinra

[Quote] #34
05 Apr 2009 04:15 pm
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 27,086
ONLINE
Indalecio
Indalecio
Leader of the Wise men
Rep: 103thumbs-up

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.


Not neccisarily. Popular rps such as DBZ or Pokemon or something would bring about random people. That is just an example though. Look how it got people to Gaia, obviously it won’t be that big but we can expect to get more traffic.


__________________

[Quote] #35
05 Apr 2009 04:20 pm
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 52,860
ONLINE
Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Dreacon
Knight of Vermilion
Rep: 71thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.


Not neccisarily. Popular rps such as DBZ or Pokemon or something would bring about random people. That is just an example though. Look how it got people to Gaia, obviously it won’t be that big but we can expect to get more traffic.



If they were to happen to find this site out of all of them. It would probably be less popular or thought of threads that would get moviecodec higher up in the search query list. Like a lot of the threads in the Vs. forum, where there are characters that are never really put together in other forums being put together here.
Basically, the more popular the idea, the more chance there is that there are more sites above this on the search list, and thus farther down one has to go to get here.


__________________


Last edited 05 Apr 2009 04:20 pm by Tyreaus Dreacon
[Quote] #36
05 Apr 2009 04:21 pm
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 27,086
ONLINE
Indalecio
Indalecio
Leader of the Wise men
Rep: 103thumbs-up

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.


Not neccisarily. Popular rps such as DBZ or Pokemon or something would bring about random people. That is just an example though. Look how it got people to Gaia, obviously it won’t be that big but we can expect to get more traffic.



If they were to happen to find this site out of all of them. It would probably be less popular or thought of threads that would get moviecodec higher up in the search query list. Like a lot of the threads in the Vs. forum, where there are characters that are never really put together in other forums being put together here.
Basically, the more popular the idea, the more chance there is that there are more sites above this on the search list, and thus farther down one has to go to get here.


That is the same for the vs forum, yet we get lots of traffic there.


__________________

[Quote] #37
05 Apr 2009 04:26 pm
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 52,860
ONLINE
Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Dreacon
Knight of Vermilion
Rep: 71thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.


Not neccisarily. Popular rps such as DBZ or Pokemon or something would bring about random people. That is just an example though. Look how it got people to Gaia, obviously it won’t be that big but we can expect to get more traffic.



If they were to happen to find this site out of all of them. It would probably be less popular or thought of threads that would get moviecodec higher up in the search query list. Like a lot of the threads in the Vs. forum, where there are characters that are never really put together in other forums being put together here.
Basically, the more popular the idea, the more chance there is that there are more sites above this on the search list, and thus farther down one has to go to get here.


That is the same for the vs forum, yet we get lots of traffic there.



That’s why I mentioned that there are a lot of threads in the Vs. forum that aren’t traditionally done in other forums. Smaller amount of other sites to weed through if someone were to google it, and there always are people googling things like that. Things titled like “Legends of Darkness” are more, common and complex than something such as “Darkseid vs Goku”. As in, someone actually googling the entire phrase “Legends of Darkness” is fairly rare as it is while the latter isn’t as rare, and other threads on other, more popular sites may be titled “Legends of Darkness” as well. If the drift is followed.


__________________


[Quote] #38
05 Apr 2009 04:28 pm
Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 27,086
ONLINE
Indalecio
Indalecio
Leader of the Wise men
Rep: 103thumbs-up

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.


Not neccisarily. Popular rps such as DBZ or Pokemon or something would bring about random people. That is just an example though. Look how it got people to Gaia, obviously it won’t be that big but we can expect to get more traffic.



If they were to happen to find this site out of all of them. It would probably be less popular or thought of threads that would get moviecodec higher up in the search query list. Like a lot of the threads in the Vs. forum, where there are characters that are never really put together in other forums being put together here.
Basically, the more popular the idea, the more chance there is that there are more sites above this on the search list, and thus farther down one has to go to get here.


That is the same for the vs forum, yet we get lots of traffic there.



That’s why I mentioned that there are a lot of threads in the Vs. forum that aren’t traditionally done in other forums. Smaller amount of other sites to weed through if someone were to google it, and there always are people googling things like that. Things titled like “Legends of Darkness” are more, common and complex than something such as “Darkseid vs Goku”. As in, someone actually googling the entire phrase “Legends of Darkness” is fairly rare as it is while the latter isn’t as rare, and other threads on other, more popular sites may be titled “Legends of Darkness” as well. If the drift is followed.


It depends on what you call the rp I suppose, but the vs forum still brings in those kinds of people, which will get them there and such.


__________________

[Quote] #39
05 Apr 2009 04:32 pm
Lauria draconia
Guest

we need a fat free zone

[Quote] #40
05 Apr 2009 04:35 pm
Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 52,860
ONLINE
Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Dreacon
Knight of Vermilion
Rep: 71thumbs-up

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Cid wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Count Bleck wrote: With all those threads gone I think an RP section should be implemented. Actually, Bjarne himself said he would add one the day before the Green Ninja assults. Sadly I deleted that pm.



Honestly I feel we should be holding off on that for now, because we do want to get rid of inactive sections, and if it turns out RP’ing isn’t that popular here as we thought it to be, we’d have another inactive section.



Better to take a chance now then to have to wait months if it is popular.



And if it turns out unpopular, it’ll simply be a step backwards to cleaning up the sections, no?
Besides, as of late, I’ve personally seen fairly little role-playing interest, though it isn’t as if I’ve been running around trying to find it either.
I know you want to get it in, I do as well, but if we end up getting the section created and it isn’t that popular, it’s just a small step backwards from the clean-up.


Unless it attracts lots of members.



I would hope it would, but it wouldn’t help if the section is otherwise practically barren save for a very small group of members.


Was this a worry for the vs forum when it was created? Because you see how fast that grows.



And a lot of the other “new” sections as well, some of which are planned to be merged and/or erased.
Quite a few Vs. topics I can see being the subject of google searches. RP threads are a different story.


Not neccisarily. Popular rps such as DBZ or Pokemon or something would bring about random people. That is just an example though. Look how it got people to Gaia, obviously it won’t be that big but we can expect to get more traffic.



If they were to happen to find this site out of all of them. It would probably be less popular or thought of threads that would get moviecodec higher up in the search query list. Like a lot of the threads in the Vs. forum, where there are characters that are never really put together in other forums being put together here.
Basically, the more popular the idea, the more chance there is that there are more sites above this on the search list, and thus farther down one has to go to get here.


That is the same for the vs forum, yet we get lots of traffic there.



That’s why I mentioned that there are a lot of threads in the Vs. forum that aren’t traditionally done in other forums. Smaller amount of other sites to weed through if someone were to google it, and there always are people googling things like that. Things titled like “Legends of Darkness” are more, common and complex than something such as “Darkseid vs Goku”. As in, someone actually googling the entire phrase “Legends of Darkness” is fairly rare as it is while the latter isn’t as rare, and other threads on other, more popular sites may be titled “Legends of Darkness” as well. If the drift is followed.


It depends on what you call the rp I suppose, but the vs forum still brings in those kinds of people, which will get them there and such.



The title is a big thing, obviously. The thing is, like Cid said, we have no real idea.
It makes more sense to me to clean up the sections we have first and work on figuring out what should be added after by judging popularity of things.
If more RP threads were actually made, it’s possible we could get more people wanting a section for that, instead of playing section trial-and-error like was done for the sections we have now that has created the relative mess we have.


__________________


Quick Reply

Your name:

You are posting as a guest, login or consider registering to protect your name.

Your reply:


Spam prevention:
[More Options] [New Topic]

Moderated by: Admins, Superusers
LOUNGE.MovieCodec.com ©lunkwill.net 2000-2009 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer
MVC Network: MovieCodec Forums/Downloads - The Lounge Forums