hshsh wrote:
Yeah and? Obviously Metroid Prime was better for it’s time than Halo 2 was. Just like Metroid Prime was better for it’s time than Halo: Combat Evolved was. So Prime is the better than both Halos. Halo 2 only slaughtered Prime 2 because of multiplayer, Prime 2 still focused majorly on the single player. So did the original Metroid Prime, and on single player alone it outscored both Halos. It just goes to show that Metroid single player is superior.
Zelda: Ocarina of Time is the best game ever made. That doesn’t change as the years go bye. It’s the experience at the time that counts.
Oh and finally, Gamerankings is far fairer than gamespot because it does an average, and Metroid Prime outscores both Halos there. Gamespot gave a Tony Hawk game a 10 for crying out loud.
Metroid Prime is an old game. You don’t want to be up to date because you don’t like facing the fact Halo 2 got better ratings than Prime 2. Yes, Prime was popular at it’s time. But is it popular now? No it isn’t. Don’t be stuck in the past. The more current ratings are more important.
My original arguement stands. Prime outscores both games. Therefore Prime is better than both. End of discussion.
I can confirm that that screenshot is before release. So not only have you compared gameplay to a cutscene but you’ve also compared pre-release to release. LMAO. Failed.
hshsh wrote:
Yes of course, choose a bad screenshot for Prime. It just goes to show that I’m right. One is also a cutscene while the other is gameplay. lol. Fail.
hshsh wrote:
Yes of course, choose a bad screenshot for Prime. It just goes to show that I’m right. One is also a cutscene while the other is gameplay. lol. Fail.
Prime > Halo.
That’s not a cutscene...
Right since you obviously play Halo facing in that direction.
hshsh wrote:
Yes of course, choose a bad screenshot for Prime.
Actually, that’s the best pic of Prime i found. Try finding a Metroid pic better looking than that.
hshsh wrote:
It just goes to show that I’m right.
Prove it. Give me a picture of Metroid Prime that is better looking than that one.
hshsh wrote:
One is also a cutscene while the other is gameplay.lol. Fail.
You’re really just making shit up. That pic was from a Multiplayer Map. Those maps aren’t even in the story, and are only used for Multiplayer. What kind of dumbass are you? And anyone with a brain would know Halo 2 looks better than Metroid Prime 1 & 2. Halo 2 is made on the Xbox, while Metroid Prime 1 & 2 are made on the Gamecube. Compare the system and game specs. Halo 2 definitely has better graphics and visuals than Metroid Prime 1 & 2.
hshsh wrote:
Prime > Halo.
Halo 2 > Prime 2
Halo 3 > Prime 3 (As expected)
Prime won in 2002. It lost in 2004. Will MP3 be better than Halo 3? i doubt it.
He’s right, that isn’t a cutscene, in cutscenes they can get a lot better graphics out of it because the controller isn’t having any imput at that time and the movements are predestined, that has the same quality as the game play.
All the same Metroid Prime always had focused on the background and other elements like that, which look spectacular in my opinion, meanwhile Halo focuses more on the characters.
I still think they’re even for graphics they just focus on different stuff.
yusif2k wrote:
Halo 2 > Prime 2
Halo 3 > Prime 3 (As expected)
Prime won in 2002. It lost in 2004. Will MP3 be better than Halo 3? i doubt that.
Well you never do know, if Prime won in 2002 and lost in 2004 that would make it a tie, so right now it could probably go either way, right?
__________________
Last edited 09 Aug 2006 10:49 am by Tyreaus Dreacon
Tyreaus Rhade wrote:
Well you never do know, if Prime won in 2002 and lost in 2004 that would make it a tie, so right now it could probably go either way, right?
Probably. Though i doubt MP3 will get a better score than Halo 3.
Well probably not, though it also does depend what else they all have in MP3...who knows what the hell they’re shoving in it...same does go for Halo 3...
Forums Index >
Games 
