Microsoft needs to stop fucking paying off reviewers

Oh man I was looking at all these comparisions of reviews of multi-platformed games and man are the people 360 bias. I mean can someone please tell me how the fuck the PS3s version of obvlivion with more content and fixed bugs and even better grahics score lower then the 360 version on most game sites? And when gamespot compared graphics I just had to drive a pencil into the keyboard. I remember they distorted the pictures on the PS3 horribly not only were they changing the lighting but they were chaning there minds on the lighting constantly like they would say the PS3 version sucked because there wasent enough light then said on another game there was to much light. Not only that but when the got to call of duty 3 I almost had to shoot myself on how badly they distorted the PS3’s version picture I mean they blurred out the backround completly and lightened it way to much like nobody would notice. And when the Lair reviews came out I was astonished on how biased it was. The dumbshits were complaining about the controllers witch were easy as fuck these dumbshits are just basing there reviews on the money microsoft gave them instead of acualy gameplay. Honestly Microsoft just has to shove its money up its ass and let the reviews review games fairly.

Because if a reviewer says something you don’t agree with Microsoft is paying them.

Atresac wrote: Because if a reviewer says something you don’t agree with Microsoft is paying them.

Of course it only makes sense.

Atresac wrote: Because if a reviewer says something you don’t agree with Microsoft is paying them.

There are profesional ways to do reviews witch disapeared when the Xbox360 and PS3s graphics were in competition. The answer is right there if you can’t take it then fuck off

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: Because if a reviewer says something you don’t agree with Microsoft is paying them.

There are profesional ways to do reviews witch disapeared when the Xbox360 and PS3s graphics were in competition. The answer is right there if you can’t take it then fuck off

Well both companies are actually using graphics as there main “Next Genniness” leap forward...

Should be compared...

And if the 360 graphics are better...

So what?

PS3KICKS360 wrote:

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: Because if a reviewer says something you don’t agree with Microsoft is paying them.

There are profesional ways to do reviews witch disapeared when the Xbox360 and PS3s graphics were in competition. The answer is right there if you can’t take it then fuck off

Well both companies are actually using graphics as there main “Next Genniness” leap forward...

Should be compared...

And if the 360 graphics are better...

So what?

if its better or not doesn’t matter its how the gamesites unfairly compare them that matters if there going to do a comparision at least do it fairly.

Its me mario wrote:

PS3KICKS360 wrote:

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: Because if a reviewer says something you don’t agree with Microsoft is paying them.

There are profesional ways to do reviews witch disapeared when the Xbox360 and PS3s graphics were in competition. The answer is right there if you can’t take it then fuck off

Well both companies are actually using graphics as there main “Next Genniness” leap forward...

Should be compared...

And if the 360 graphics are better...

So what?

if its better or not doesn’t matter its how the gamesites unfairly compare them that matters if there going to do a comparision at least do it fairly.

Actually i think they are quite fair.

How would you do it differently?

PS3KICKS360 wrote:

Its me mario wrote:

PS3KICKS360 wrote:

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: Because if a reviewer says something you don’t agree with Microsoft is paying them.

There are profesional ways to do reviews witch disapeared when the Xbox360 and PS3s graphics were in competition. The answer is right there if you can’t take it then fuck off

Well both companies are actually using graphics as there main “Next Genniness” leap forward...

Should be compared...

And if the 360 graphics are better...

So what?

if its better or not doesn’t matter its how the gamesites unfairly compare them that matters if there going to do a comparision at least do it fairly.

Actually i think they are quite fair.

How would you do it differently?

Well I wouldn’t distort the pictures like they do and I would make the lighting about the same and I would refuse money from microsoft to distort the PS3’s picture

Do you have any... you know... proof that they distort the pictures or are you just aimlessly bitching?

Atresac wrote: Do you have any... you know... proof that they distort the pictures or are you just aimlessly bitching?

Go to gamespot and look at were they do the comparisions they do with the PS3 and Xbox360 graphic wise and you will know exactly what Im talking about.

I’ve looked at a lot of the graphics comparisons dude. From when they came out last year. They don’t distort them at all.

Atresac wrote: I’ve looked at a lot of the graphics comparisons dude. From when they came out last year. They don’t distort them at all.

Oh your a fanboy. Then theres no point in trying to fix your blindness because you will just deny any peice of fact I throw at you.

http://www.joystiq.com/media/2006/11/compare.jpg

look at that picture if you tell me that the PS3 version isn’t distorted any you are fucking lying

I’m a fanboy? Because I say you’re full of shit?

I don’t even own an xbox or a ps3. I have a Wii. I go by the different comparisons I’ve seen by image, video, and from experience playing the games at friend’s houses.

Don’t get your panties in a knot because you’re full of shit.

Atresac wrote: I’m a fanboy? Because I say you’re full of shit?

I don’t even own an xbox or a ps3. I have a Wii. I go by the different comparisons I’ve seen by image, video, and from experience playing the games at friend’s houses.

Don’t get your panties in a knot because you’re full of shit.

Blah Blah Blah fanboy bullshit. I dont have to waste my time with you so I’m not

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: I’m a fanboy? Because I say you’re full of shit?

I don’t even own an xbox or a ps3. I have a Wii. I go by the different comparisons I’ve seen by image, video, and from experience playing the games at friend’s houses.

Don’t get your panties in a knot because you’re full of shit.

Blah Blah Blah fanboy bullshit. I dont have to waste my time with you so I’m not

Him full of bullshit...?

tsk tsk.

Its me mario wrote: http://www.joystiq.com/media/2006/11/compare.jpg

look at that picture if you tell me that the PS3 version isn’t distorted any you are fucking lying

it’s not, other than the parts highlighting certain aspects, but the image itself hasn’t been distorted.

I distort images all the time, and have dealt with stuff like this before. You’re just a kid who’s pissed that people like one system more than your’s and thinks that swearing makes you cool.

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: I’m a fanboy? Because I say you’re full of shit?

I don’t even own an xbox or a ps3. I have a Wii. I go by the different comparisons I’ve seen by image, video, and from experience playing the games at friend’s houses.

Don’t get your panties in a knot because you’re full of shit.

Blah Blah Blah fanboy bullshit. I dont have to waste my time with you so I’m not

I’m sure I sound like the fanboy here. Not the one who’s accusing every single review site of distorting images because big bad microsoft paid them to say the 360 has better graphics than the PS3.

Besides, to be a successful fanboy I’d need to have a bias. I’m not too fond of the 360 or PS3. I have a Nintendo Wii and PS2, that’s all.

Quit complaining because you’re full of it.

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: Do you have any... you know... proof that they distort the pictures or are you just aimlessly bitching?

Go to gamespot and look at were they do the comparisions they do with the PS3 and Xbox360 graphic wise and you will know exactly what Im talking about.

actually COD3 (PS3) did look like wat was shown on Gamespot....i learned that from personal experience.

Demon Slayer wrote:

Its me mario wrote:

Atresac wrote: Do you have any... you know... proof that they distort the pictures or are you just aimlessly bitching?

Go to gamespot and look at were they do the comparisions they do with the PS3 and Xbox360 graphic wise and you will know exactly what Im talking about.

actually COD3 (PS3) did look like wat was shown on Gamespot....i learned that from personal experience.

Oh ok so your saying that the backround was just a blur and the people had zero texture?