Joined: 08 Sep 2007
Posts: 9,994
OFFLINE
zetaI know the King's secrets (it's rat)
Rep: 58
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 49,513
OFFLINE
CidHOLY SHIT IT WAS LUPUS!
Rep: 112I’m inclined to agree with him on one aspect. I believe that most people who are going to buy Halo already owned a 360. I mean, Halo is Xbox’s flagship series.
__________________
Rise of Shinra
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 14,480
OFFLINE
SquippleSQUiP?
Rep: 82Yeah, pretty much. I hope nintendo survives if the 2 companies will fail in the next 20 years. They’d better get Halo though...
__________________
Last edited 30 Sep 2007 12:46 am by Squipple
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 42,162
OFFLINE
ZucasAgent of Chaos
Rep: 65MS would never get rid of Bungie as they could still use them for their PC games after they get rid of their Xbox division.
But if MS were to develop games for a console it would be a Nintendo platform.
__________________
Joined: 31 Aug 2006
Posts: 14,480
OFFLINE
SquippleSQUiP?
Rep: 82Zucas wrote:
MS would never get rid of Bungie as they could still use them for their PC games after they get rid of their Xbox division.
But if MS were to develop games for a console it would be a Nintendo platform.
I think this whole console war is rediculous. Just make one console with all games with the same software, and all’s well. But no...
__________________
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 42,162
OFFLINE
ZucasAgent of Chaos
Rep: 65Squipple wrote:
Zucas wrote:
MS would never get rid of Bungie as they could still use them for their PC games after they get rid of their Xbox division.
But if MS were to develop games for a console it would be a Nintendo platform.
I think this whole console war is rediculous. Just make one console with all games with the same software, and all’s well. But no...
Gaming is a market. Meaning there is profits to be won out of it. Thus there must be competition for those profits. In the hardware and software areas. But think if there was no competition then games wouldn’t progress at all now would they. Kinda like what happened in the Atari generations which caused the crash of the market in 1983.
__________________
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 2,109
OFFLINE
DildodoUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 26the NES was not needed, atari where doing just fine!
Last edited 01 Oct 2007 06:44 am by Dildodo
No, they were not, Atari was a failing company and Nintendo had better games, & graphlx Pacman on the 2600 was fucking terribal and the 5200 was just a failed atempt to keep up w/ Nintendo wich had already owned the Japanese market
Didus, it helps to know what the fuck your talking about before you open your mouth
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 2,109
OFFLINE
DildodoUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 26Et 2600 kicked ass
Last edited 01 Oct 2007 06:42 am by Dildodo
Joined: 09 Sep 2007
Posts: 341
OFFLINE
ramunarseRegular
Rep: 0
_N3M3SIS_ wrote:
No, they were not, Atari was a failing company and Nintendo had better games, & graphlx Pacman on the 2600 was fucking terribal and the 5200 was just a failed atempt to keep up w/ Nintendo wich had already owned the Japanese market
Didus, it helps to know what the fuck your talking about before you open your mouth
HOLY SHIT ATARI HAS WAY BETTER GAMES THAN NINTENDO YOU NON HETROSEXUAL PERSON!
__________________
ramunematt wrote:
Itachi, you have been saying that over and over like a broken record but you have yet to back it up with any proof.
Gold
Last edited 01 Oct 2007 06:41 am by ramunarse
Joined: 26 Mar 2007
Posts: 23,240
Dante666LoL' WuT?
Rep: 78can i ask why you call nintendo " ninty " ?
__________________
The Return of the Didus wrote:
Et 2600 kicked ass
Oh, is that why they burried truck loads of E.T. 2600 games in a landfill?
Again Didus, it pays to think before you speak
Forums Index >
Games 
