HALOOOOOOOO Been crazy since the day I was born! Rep: 38
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
HALOOOOOOOO wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
PS3 Fan wrote:
E3 08: Warhawk Trophy patch arrives tomorrow
Quote:
MCV writes: “Retroactive 1.4 update means achievements already logged will instantly unlock PS3 Trophies
In the midst of the E3 media frenzy, Warhawk game director Dylan Jobe has confirmed that tomorrow will see the arrival of the 1.4 Warhawk patch, and with it will come PS3 Trophy support, as well as a host of new game modes.
Jobe added that the Trophies will be retroactive – meaning that if a gamer has already fulfilled Trophy criteria pre-update, the relevant Trophies will automatically be unlocked”.
Update: Trophies are in update v1.5 not v1.4
Quote:
we actually developed the v1.5 Patch in parallel, but staggered, with the v1.4 Patch. The reason we did this is because there are stuffs in the v1.4 Patch that we wanted to get out to everyone ASAP...but the v1.5 patch isn’t that far behind!
Nice to see they’re patching up their classics.
Btw I now have enough for a PS3 just I don’t feel like emptying out my whole account to get one. I’ve been getting some pretty nice paychecks but I think I’ll save at least half for college. That’s why a price cut would be nice.
__________________
The MASK wrote:
Need I remind everyone Howard Stern’s Penis accomplished far more than Jesus.
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
No you didn’t. I was trying to say that they gimped the game to meet Wii hardware capabilities, in which case I won’t buy it.
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
No you didn’t. I was trying to say that they gimped the game to meet Wii hardware capabilities, in which case I won’t buy it.
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
No you didn’t. I was trying to say that they gimped the game to meet Wii hardware capabilities, in which case I won’t buy it.
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
No you didn’t. I was trying to say that they gimped the game to meet Wii hardware capabilities, in which case I won’t buy it.
They didn’t gimp Call of Duty 3
COD3 was still shit thou.
It wasn’t shit, it just wasn’t nearly as fun as COD2.
__________________
The MASK wrote:
Need I remind everyone Howard Stern’s Penis accomplished far more than Jesus.
HALOOOOOOOO Been crazy since the day I was born! Rep: 38
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
HALOOOOOOOO wrote:
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
HALOOOOOOOO wrote:
Di5turbed wrote:
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
No you didn’t. I was trying to say that they gimped the game to meet Wii hardware capabilities, in which case I won’t buy it.
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
No you didn’t. I was trying to say that they gimped the game to meet Wii hardware capabilities, in which case I won’t buy it.
They didn’t gimp Call of Duty 3
COD3 was still shit thou.
It wasn’t shit, it just wasn’t nearly as fun as COD2.
COD3 Is wayyyy better.... Vehicles,Classes,Huge maps,24 player support
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Ok, Call of Duty World at War is Officially out of my list, there’s a Wii version.
If you liked call of duty 4 multiplayer then you love World at war its the same thing They gave them the multiplayer component so it will be the same thing with perks and all...
Yeah, basically the same except set 60 years earlier.
Ok, basically you both didn’t get the intention of my post.
No, I got the intention. I was trying to say how the game is set in WWII for the fourth time in the series.
No you didn’t. I was trying to say that they gimped the game to meet Wii hardware capabilities, in which case I won’t buy it.
They didn’t gimp Call of Duty 3
COD3 was still shit thou.
It wasn’t shit, it just wasn’t nearly as fun as COD2.
COD3 Is wayyyy better.... Vehicles,Classes,Huge maps,24 player support
lmao the vehicles were a joke
__________________
The MASK wrote:
Need I remind everyone Howard Stern’s Penis accomplished far more than Jesus.
Anyway, the stage has 58 regular-sized LCDs hung around it on scaffold, a massive main screen above the centre and three still-massive LCDs hung to its left and right. There are PS3s on little white coffee tables all around the stage under spotlights. It’s elbow to elbow with no spare seats as far as I can see in any direction.
13:28:04 -
We’re having a few internet connection issues at the moment, so if things go haywire we may go to our secondary solution, which isn’t as, er, verbose. Hopefully that won’t happen, but apologies in advance if it does.
13:23:08 -
Ready for round two? After much frantic driving and wandering around downtown, we’re inside the Shrine Auditorium sitting in front of a bank of giant wall-mounted screens showing PS3 games in action - echochrome, MGS4, GT5, LocoRoco. The show may start late given the amount of people being shipped in from Nintendo’s event.
