_A_C_E_ wrote:
Uhhh the fact that 360 has better 3rd support is noticeable considering that’s the reason why MS is selling more 360’s than PS3’s. Last gen the PS2 had all the support this gen it’s spread out and look what happened. The 360 stands against the PS3 not just because of price but because of value. 360 getting almost every single game the PS3 gets which is alot different from last gen.
Let me ask you this:
Do you honestly think that the 360 would be selling this good if it had the same price point but hardly any 3rd party support? Without the games, how can a games console sell? Talk about flawed logic buster, and no I ain’t mad, it’s called being cocky when you know your right. Your lame excuses ain’t gonna make me think otherwise so can you…pleeeease stfu?
The only self ownage I see is the one post I posted of you making yourself look like an idiot. Read my post after this one and you’ll know what I mean. Like I said before, MS discontinuing it’s arcade and replacing it with pro hasn’t happened yet but you still say it’s gonna fail…you broken record you. So if it hasn’t happened yet then the only reason why I owned myself would be because you said so but muffin…your word ain’t too good around here so you might wanna stfu. Or continue I don’t mind.
The PS3 20 gig sku was getting outsold 10-1 by the already dismal selling 60 gig PS3, I remember this. You call that a success? Lol.
Any company has to be desperate when going up against a huge brand. MS was desperate and Nintendo was innovative and so far it’s worked out for both so where does that leave you with your argument? Your kinda dumb hey? And I don’t care what you think is the best console of all time and stop telling me what it has….I have one.
I didn’t say everyone who likes God Of War has a PS3, I said almost everyone. The people who have a PS3 reach out to games like that, it’s not the other way around where the game reaches out to the people who don’t already have that system. Sony now knows this more than anybody.
I freaked out? What you’ve never been sworn at? Ahhh muffin…I’ll stop swearing if you want me too and we’ll go back to a civilized conversation. No more swearing from this point on, pinky swear.
ORLY? So if that’s the reason why MS is selling more 360’s than PS3’s, why didn’t they sell more before the price cut? Your arguments make no sense buddy and you are clearly mixing up something up here. Of course the 3rd party support is a selling point, but it’s no selling point over the PS3, because there is almoust no difference between both consoles in that department. So yeah the 3rd party support sells 360’s, but it’s clearly not the reason why it sells more than the PS3.
Sorry buddy you actually owned yourself twice now. First of all the proof is on the table and it perfectly backs up my theory. Funny how you avoided to elaborate on that and instead went on to claim I own myself with my own statements. I have to decribe it now as an EPIC SELFOWNAGE, because your conclusion makes no sense. Let me make it easy for you now - Because the PS3 is too expensive it still has the price card to use, because Sony doesn’t do midnight launches, it has still this card to play and so on and on and on. You have obviously some basic understanding problems, Sony’s problems and shortcomings are actually the reason why they have all the cards and why MS have none, as the already used up all their aces and maximised their potential. Is that so hard to understand? LOL so please buddy before you throw at somebody some lame insults like being dumb, an idiot, a brocken record or whatever take a closer look at yourself. You give me a good laugh, especially how you turned a civilised conversation into some cheap insults, displays perfectly how weak and primitive you are.
You obviously missed it, but the 20GB version wasn’t produced in the same quantities as the 60GB version, it was hardly even available in the states and in EU it didn’t even exist.
ORLY? Was Sony desperate with the PS1? Or the PS2? Was MS desperate with Xbox? Nope and seriously buddy, you called my out on that when you asked me if I support the right company, so don’t cry if I give you the reasons.
Yeah sure, almoust everyone, PS3 is so cheap everyone who wants it can have it LMAO
HALOOOOOOOO Been crazy since the day I was born! Rep: 38
Nerevar 117 wrote:
XbugTerminator wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
Nice, now that looks killer
Those are some of the ugliest pictures of a game, I’ve sever seen the gen. Only the bottom one even looks presentable.
I agree with you there. But then again, anything that represents Killzone 2 will always look awesome to him because you’re talking to a Sony fanboy there. [sarcasm]It’s simply impossible for it to look bad, right?[/sarcasm]
HALOOOOOOOO Been crazy since the day I was born! Rep: 38
SupremeCommanderThor wrote:
Well said. I couldn’t said it better. Going for the average customer playing cheap prices have a cost, and it gonna backfire on MS.
No, it really isn’t. By the time PS3 drops the price the 360 will have outsold it by substantial amounts (it’s on track to be equal with or surpass PS3 sales for this year now, which no one would have thought possible before the price drop), and the average consumer may go “Hey, this system is a lot cheaper than Sony’s and has basically the same games so let’s buy it instead." The 360 has the momentum right now. But Why?
XbugTerminator wrote:
Sony’s problems and shortcomings are actually the reason why they have all the cards and why MS have none, as the already used up all their aces and maximised their potential.
If we were in an economic high and MS had still dropped the price when they did, 360 sales would not be looking so nice because back then PS3 had all the cards. Then suddenly the world goes down the drain and everyone is looking for the things they’re used to at less cost. The recession is not going to magically disappear when Sony decides to drop the PS3’s price, so in terms of sales it will not destroy the 360 as it will still be around $50 more. We’ll be in a recession until at the very least 2010. And going by your logic MS still has some cards because they too have shortcomings. Also, we have no idea if they’re losing money on the system or breaking even or what as they haven’t commented. They could easily get rid of the Arcade and drop the pricing of the other two SKUs. Yes I know they said for many more years a drop isn’t coming, but they don’t always have to tell the truth. Their potential has not yet maximized.
Also, in terms of advertisements I see many more for the PS3 where I live. Around 2/3 of game commercials are advertised towards that system. And I live 45 mins. north of MS, NOA, Bungie, and Valve. Certainly not companies that support Sony much. I know that means nothing but it’s cool nevertheless .
Those are some of the ugliest pictures of a game, I’ve sever seen the gen. Only the bottom one even looks presentable.
I agree with you there. But then again, anything that represents Killzone 2 will always look awesome to him because you’re talking to a Sony fanboy there. [sarcasm]It’s simply impossible for it to look bad, right?[/sarcasm]
Sure buddy, the problem is you forgot that the whole press thinks it’s the best looking game Especially the 4th pic looks really killer
HALOOOOOOOO Been crazy since the day I was born! Rep: 38
XbugTerminator wrote:
HALOOOOOOOO wrote:
Nerevar 117 wrote:
XbugTerminator wrote:
CPO Fraser wrote:
Nice, now that looks killer
Those are some of the ugliest pictures of a game, I’ve sever seen the gen. Only the bottom one even looks presentable.
I agree with you there. But then again, anything that represents Killzone 2 will always look awesome to him because you’re talking to a Sony fanboy there. [sarcasm]It’s simply impossible for it to look bad, right?[/sarcasm]
Sure buddy, the problem is you forgot that the whole press thinks it’s the best looking game Especially the 4th pic looks really killer
Okay, show me every journalist’s opinion in the world. And the 4th pic is very ugly, not killer.
Zucas wrote:
I must say the character models in Killzone 2 are well not so great. REally the only thing that looks great is the ground in the 3rd one.
I’m sure the title looks better in motion but I’ve seen those multiplayer beta levels and they are just so bland looking.
And no the press till thinks the most realistic looking game ever is Crysis.
True, fact is the main thing KZ2 has going for it is polygon count and lighting, Titles have better things like higher reseloution textures or mapping then KZ2.
And Nervin, Naw, I’ll show you the worst looking KZ2 screen.
Zucas wrote:
I must say the character models in Killzone 2 are well not so great. REally the only thing that looks great is the ground in the 3rd one.
I’m sure the title looks better in motion but I’ve seen those multiplayer beta levels and they are just so bland looking.
And no the press till thinks the most realistic looking game ever is Crysis.
True, fact is the main thing KZ2 has going for it is polygon count and lighting, Titles have better things like higher reseloution textures or mapping then KZ2.
And Nervin, Naw, I’ll show you the worst looking KZ2 screen.
Way to go showing one ingame and upclose and the other from some tech crap and farer away. A great comparison I must say
Go with your biased staments to some gaming forum and you will be eaten alive. Heres the first place you can visit http://forums.gametrailers.com/?do=show_thread&id=535007
Zucas wrote:
I must say the character models in Killzone 2 are well not so great. REally the only thing that looks great is the ground in the 3rd one.
I’m sure the title looks better in motion but I’ve seen those multiplayer beta levels and they are just so bland looking.
And no the press till thinks the most realistic looking game ever is Crysis.
True, fact is the main thing KZ2 has going for it is polygon count and lighting, Titles have better things like higher reseloution textures or mapping then KZ2.
And Nervin, Naw, I’ll show you the worst looking KZ2 screen.
Way to go showing one ingame and upclose and the other from some tech crap and farer away. A great comparison I must say
XbugTerminator wrote:
Go with your biased staments to some gaming forum and you will be eaten alive. Heres the first place you can visit http://forums.gametrailers.com/?do=show_thread&id=535007
Can’t, got banned till December 6th for being pissed off when I discovered PS3 had it’s Backwards Compatibility removed.
Zucas wrote:
I must say the character models in Killzone 2 are well not so great. REally the only thing that looks great is the ground in the 3rd one.
I’m sure the title looks better in motion but I’ve seen those multiplayer beta levels and they are just so bland looking.
And no the press till thinks the most realistic looking game ever is Crysis.
True, fact is the main thing KZ2 has going for it is polygon count and lighting, Titles have better things like higher reseloution textures or mapping then KZ2.
And Nervin, Naw, I’ll show you the worst looking KZ2 screen.
Way to go showing one ingame and upclose and the other from some tech crap and farer away. A great comparison I must say
Reminds me of this one:
Uhm not really, all ingame and comparable distances. BTW I didn’t do this comparison but you on the other side did
Forums Index >
Games 
.
