I just realised that Forza 3 has just 8 cars on the track, GT5P has 16 and still looks better. Now that’s a biggie, especially because the polycount per car isn’t bigger in Forza.
XbugTerminator wrote:
I just realised that Forza 3 has just 8 cars on the track, GT5P has 16 and still looks better. Now that’s a biggie, especially because the polycount per car isn’t bigger in Forza.
Because you think so?
forza 3 also has realistic damage and car rollover, along with customization on the vehicles.
Where are some numbers for Forza 2? First of all Turn 10 are loudmouths, they would show off like in every interview with cold numbers if they were really that great and would surpass GT. And secondly this is all bull, I will do the math to prove you:
360 can display 500 million polys per second. With 8 cars and every car being 1,000,000 polys it makes 8,000,000 polys. With 60 frames per second it makes 480,000,000 polys. Good luck lol
Where are some numbers for Forza 2? First of all Turn 10 are loudmouths, they would show off like in every interview with cold numbers if they were really that great and would surpass GT. And secondly this is all bull, I will do the math to prove you:
360 can display 500 million polys per second. With 8 cars and every car being 1,000,000 polys it makes 8,000,000 polys. With 60 frames per second it makes 480,000,000 polys. Good luck lol
Zucas wrote:
Squip- man you are ruining your smart moment. Well can’t say I’m surprised. The RE storyline is one of the best in the industry if not the best. RE4 didn’t let up on that and gave a compelling conspiracy to go along with the first 4 (RE0,1,2<3) and Code Veronica.
RE5 on the other hand completely took all those stories and said screw the conspiracy we are going to ruin Jill, Chris, and Wesker’s character, make it cliche, and end it on a subpar note. The whole setup from RE4 was just completely ruined. All because they ruined the characters.
Don’t get me wrong, RE5 is a fun game to play through. But that’s all it is. Just became an unsual action game with a sublime story for an RE game. Any Resident Evil fan can’t look at that story and be satisfied with it. Because if you are, you are not a Resident Evil fan.
i know you posted this a few days ago, but are you serious? have you even played the first game (Which is my personal favorite)...if anything, RE5 put the series back in place. none of that branching off crap.
FAIL. Talk to me when you actually know and understand the RE series well and then understand why RE5 completely destroys that. Silly goose.
I’ve played every main line RE game except Code Veronica. 0, 1, 2, and 3 all stick to a similar telling story. RE4 works as a spinoff but really sets in motion a way of tying it to the first 3. RE5 came out tied it weakly, changed the characters, and ended it weakly. RE5’s story compared to the rest and how it fits was just bad. And it’s not surprising considering the original creator, Shinji Mikami, had nothing to do with it. Silly goose trying to challenge me on Resident Evil.
bah! so, you haven’t played code veronica and learned how Chris was in africa trying to get to the root of everything? hmmm... veronica is what was supposed to lead to 5 in the first place, that’s why i was surprised with 4 and how it didn’t have anything to do with code veronica.
Zucas wrote:
Squip- man you are ruining your smart moment. Well can’t say I’m surprised. The RE storyline is one of the best in the industry if not the best. RE4 didn’t let up on that and gave a compelling conspiracy to go along with the first 4 (RE0,1,2<3) and Code Veronica.
RE5 on the other hand completely took all those stories and said screw the conspiracy we are going to ruin Jill, Chris, and Wesker’s character, make it cliche, and end it on a subpar note. The whole setup from RE4 was just completely ruined. All because they ruined the characters.
Don’t get me wrong, RE5 is a fun game to play through. But that’s all it is. Just became an unsual action game with a sublime story for an RE game. Any Resident Evil fan can’t look at that story and be satisfied with it. Because if you are, you are not a Resident Evil fan.
i know you posted this a few days ago, but are you serious? have you even played the first game (Which is my personal favorite)...if anything, RE5 put the series back in place. none of that branching off crap.
FAIL. Talk to me when you actually know and understand the RE series well and then understand why RE5 completely destroys that. Silly goose.
I’ve played every main line RE game except Code Veronica. 0, 1, 2, and 3 all stick to a similar telling story. RE4 works as a spinoff but really sets in motion a way of tying it to the first 3. RE5 came out tied it weakly, changed the characters, and ended it weakly. RE5’s story compared to the rest and how it fits was just bad. And it’s not surprising considering the original creator, Shinji Mikami, had nothing to do with it. Silly goose trying to challenge me on Resident Evil.
bah! so, you haven’t played code veronica and learned how Chris was in africa trying to get to the root of everything? hmmm... veronica is what was supposed to lead to 5 in the first place, that’s why i was surprised with 4 and how it didn’t have anything to do with code veronica.
But I know everything that has happened in Code Veronica. Not my fault I never owned a PS2, Dreamcast, and impossible to find on Gamecube. You on the other hand probably haven’t played Umbrella Chronicles which puts all the pieces together. Fucking noob.
But it’s not like anything led into anything. Everything set it up for everything that shouldn’t have happened in RE5. Really all you needed to know was a general knowledge of the first few to get the shitty story that was going to come out of this one. Call that story a RE game? Yea right. More like Chris on steroids takes on cliche villain in a cape Wesker. Just pathetic.
Forums Index >
Games 
