Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 8,080
P. MooreM v C Graphics Designer
Rep: 15
nintendo
rofit maximisation
sony:sales maximisation
microsoft: sales maximisation
nintendo is trying to figure each single posible way they can charge the maximum amount and get money, eg. the internet chanel which will cost money after june, the already dead(costs nothing to distribute) VC games which they charge way too much for, and of course its the only console making a profit
sony has already got the most established brand and is more focused on maximising sales of the blu ray player to become the dominant format.
microsoft im not sure on but they want to get the most widely established console but they are also working on profit maximisation with such things are xbox live, providing more services which cost nothing to ditribute but cost heaps(such as south park episodes in HD
im the most intelegent guy on this site i beleive :P and for saying im the most intellegent i will get flamed
__________________

Edited 27 Mar 2007 05:44 am by P. Moore
Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 16,421
ramunemattBanned
Rep: 63
First of all P. Moore, your above post was biased. You used propaganda to try and make Nintendo look money grubbing, don’t be surprised if you get flamed. The goal of every company is to sell and make profit, Nintendo isn’t the only one looking for profit. They all want the maximum amount of sales so they can make a profit, that is why they made these consoles in the first place. Tell me, what is the point of making a game console and selling it? It’s to make money!! Game companies don’t want the maximum amount of sales just for the heck of it, they want the money that comes with it.
And second....
P. Moore wrote:
im the most intelegent guy on this site i beleive :P and for saying im the most intellegent i will get flamed
Um..... obviously.......
__________________
You LOSE

Edited 27 Mar 2007 07:07 am by ramunematt
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 50,000
CidSephiroth > HST
Rep: 121
P. Moore wrote:
im the most intelegent guy on this site i beleive :P and for saying im the most intellegent i will get flamed
heh heh heh...
Oh your serious? Allow me to laugh even harder.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
__________________
Rise of Shinra
That is one of the best qoutes I have ever heard.
__________________
PkmPFC:0301-6372-2725 MPHFC:5455-2991-6686
XBL:PlasmaSoldierX SSBFC:0774-3907-7773
Joined: 30 Jan 2007
Posts: 490
Alvin DinoRegular
Rep: 4
P. Moore wrote:
im the most intelegent guy on this site
you spelt intelligent wrong
__________________
MAPLE STORY SUCKS PS3 SUCKS PSP SUCKS PS2 SUCKS SONY SUCKS BILL GATES SUCKS
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 50,000
CidSephiroth > HST
Rep: 121
Alvin Dino wrote:
P. Moore wrote:
im the most intelegent guy on this site
you spelt intelligent wrong
hahahahaha!
__________________
Rise of Shinra
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 6,240
STX ToSsGirLI'm more baller than Reach...
Rep: 39
P. Moore wrote:
nintendo is trying to figure each single posible way they can charge the maximum amount and get money, eg. the internet chanel which will cost money after june, the already dead(costs nothing to distribute) VC games which they charge way too much for, and of course its the only console making a profit
You don’t know how the VC works do you?
They have to reprogram all the games to work on the Wii’s CPU. That’s not going to be just some throwaway cost. Takes awhile for emulators to release ROMs; these guys are trying to emulate the game perfectly with least amount of glitches.
__________________

Haruhi demands you join Anime United!
Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 14,129
CPO FraserThe Fuckin Way She Goes...
Rep: 49
P. Moore wrote:
im the most intelegent guy on this site i beleive :P and for saying im the most intellegent i will get flamed
You spelled intelligent wrong.
Edit: Beaten to it, damn.
__________________

Edited 27 Mar 2007 05:29 pm by CPO Fraser
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 16,870
kev360Chocolate Jesus
Rep: 38
yes, cuz sony and ms don’t want money. either way, with the wii, nintendo is owning both of them in both ways.
__________________

Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 8,080
P. MooreM v C Graphics Designer
Rep: 15
no, a companies number one goal may not be to get profit maximisation, nintendo needs sales maximisation which is why it went with the slightly improved graphics and a wiimote chucked in, with sales maximisation u dont need to make a profit but its to try and kick the compitition out of the market so they can later make bigger profits, and sony already has the most established brand, and pretty much killed microsoft and nintendo last gen, nintendo got lucky with this console if it didn’t do this well it would of put them out of business pretty much, microsoft lost several billion on xbox but they dont rely on games to survive just like sony, and if this seems unfinished its cus im cant be stuffed explaining economics to u fools.
btw, intelligent is the american spelling
__________________

Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 16,870
kev360Chocolate Jesus
Rep: 38
ok, better. i’m saying overall, every companies primary goal is to make cash.
in that case, you could make a case for the ps2 being the same, seeing as it sold like hot cakes.
but, as i said before, nintendo is getting both profit maximization and sales maximization. and, its not luck, it probably has to do with the fact that nintendo knows what they are doing after 20 years.
i hate those words that are spelled different in different areas....
__________________

Edited 28 Mar 2007 10:05 am by kev360
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 50,000
CidSephiroth > HST
Rep: 121
Well, in the beginning Sony and Microsoft actually had two very different goals for making game consoles.
Sony’s original plan was to crush Nintendo and drive them out of business.
Microsoft’s plan was to get a Microsoft product in every room of the hose, including the entertainment/family room.
__________________
Rise of Shinra
Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,752
HiroshamaUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 31
Nintendo has said for years they never look to lose money, hence the different(cheaper) direction.
__________________



Pages: [1]