raep wrote:
I don’t get why everyone flips their shit if someone has the hots for a fictional character.
I mean yeah they’re purely fictional, but people who fantasize over playboy models or actresses like angelina jolie or jessica alba are not really living in any less of a fantasy land.
This thread is pretty weird but I mean, come on guys. Don’t act like you’re less pathetic because you fawn over real people you’ll never get.
For the same reason a rationalist laughs at thiests...Samus, like god is imaginary. As far as fawning over real women, thats simple. No matter how small the chance, even a billion to one chance, there is still that one in a billion shot it will happen....Can’t say the same for fictional characters...Personally I try to only oogle women that are attainable....Fellas its not that difficult to get a decent looking chick... And once you get some poontang, fictional characters become laughable just like everything else(even nonfictional characters that are unatianable)...
That doesn’t really mean anything that they’re imaginary. They’re not pretending they’re real like theists pretend God is. It’s just a drawing or something they find attractive. Just in the same way a poster on a wall of a real girl is just a collection of ink people find attractive, or a picture online is just pixels.
I just don’t see the reason to lash out because someone is all up ons for a make-believe person.
raep wrote:
I don’t get why everyone flips their shit if someone has the hots for a fictional character.
I mean yeah they’re purely fictional, but people who fantasize over playboy models or actresses like angelina jolie or jessica alba are not really living in any less of a fantasy land.
This thread is pretty weird but I mean, come on guys. Don’t act like you’re less pathetic because you fawn over real people you’ll never get.
For the same reason a rationalist laughs at thiests...Samus, like god is imaginary. As far as fawning over real women, thats simple. No matter how small the chance, even a billion to one chance, there is still that one in a billion shot it will happen....Can’t say the same for fictional characters...Personally I try to only oogle women that are attainable....Fellas its not that difficult to get a decent looking chick... And once you get some poontang, fictional characters become laughable just like everything else(even nonfictional characters that are unatianable)...
That doesn’t really mean anything that they’re imaginary. They’re not pretending they’re real like theists pretend God is. It’s just a drawing or something they find attractive. Just in the same way a poster on a wall of a real girl is just a collection of ink people find attractive, or a picture online is just pixels.
I just don’t see the reason to lash out because someone is all up ons for a make-believe person.
raep wrote:
I don’t get why everyone flips their shit if someone has the hots for a fictional character.
I mean yeah they’re purely fictional, but people who fantasize over playboy models or actresses like angelina jolie or jessica alba are not really living in any less of a fantasy land.
This thread is pretty weird but I mean, come on guys. Don’t act like you’re less pathetic because you fawn over real people you’ll never get.
For the same reason a rationalist laughs at thiests...Samus, like god is imaginary. As far as fawning over real women, thats simple. No matter how small the chance, even a billion to one chance, there is still that one in a billion shot it will happen....Can’t say the same for fictional characters...Personally I try to only oogle women that are attainable....Fellas its not that difficult to get a decent looking chick... And once you get some poontang, fictional characters become laughable just like everything else(even nonfictional characters that are unatianable)...
That doesn’t really mean anything that they’re imaginary. They’re not pretending they’re real like theists pretend God is. It’s just a drawing or something they find attractive. Just in the same way a poster on a wall of a real girl is just a collection of ink people find attractive, or a picture online is just pixels.
I just don’t see the reason to lash out because someone is all up ons for a make-believe person.
I’m trying not to get on the guy too bad about it but common...My last sentance in the previous post stands...I fully understand admiring beauty in a picture, painting, sculpture, etc...The point I tried to make (albeit badly) is while admiration for ones work as an artist is fine. Reality tells us to not oogle over it too much and get someone real...Attraction comes from the need to procreate. Attraction to a fictional work is just deluding yourself...It also keeps you from engaging in the entire reason for life (procreation) to an extent.
__________________
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen F. Roberts
raep wrote:
I don’t get why everyone flips their shit if someone has the hots for a fictional character.
I mean yeah they’re purely fictional, but people who fantasize over playboy models or actresses like angelina jolie or jessica alba are not really living in any less of a fantasy land.
This thread is pretty weird but I mean, come on guys. Don’t act like you’re less pathetic because you fawn over real people you’ll never get.
For the same reason a rationalist laughs at thiests...Samus, like god is imaginary. As far as fawning over real women, thats simple. No matter how small the chance, even a billion to one chance, there is still that one in a billion shot it will happen....Can’t say the same for fictional characters...Personally I try to only oogle women that are attainable....Fellas its not that difficult to get a decent looking chick... And once you get some poontang, fictional characters become laughable just like everything else(even nonfictional characters that are unatianable)...
That doesn’t really mean anything that they’re imaginary. They’re not pretending they’re real like theists pretend God is. It’s just a drawing or something they find attractive. Just in the same way a poster on a wall of a real girl is just a collection of ink people find attractive, or a picture online is just pixels.
I just don’t see the reason to lash out because someone is all up ons for a make-believe person.
I’m trying not to get on the guy too bad about it but common...My last sentance in the previous post stands...I fully understand admiring beauty in a picture, painting, sculpture, etc...The point I tried to make (albeit badly) is while admiration for ones work as an artist is fine. Reality tells us to not oogle over it too much and get someone real...Attraction comes from the need to procreate. Attraction to a fictional work is just deluding yourself...It also keeps you from engaging in the entire reason for life (procreation) to an extent.
That’s a bit more agreeable. Obviously no one should spend so much time gawking over anyone, fictional or otherwise, because that’s just unhealthy.
But people are allowed to be attracted to...things(?) without wanting to have to fuck them. I mean if you show me someone who has never found someone attractive without the intent of having sex with them, I’ll show you a liar.
There’s nothing wrong with enjoying eye candy, and if a drawing of eye candy is your thing so be it. But again, if you get into it too much, whether they’re real or fake, you’re a loser either way.
I got a handful of games' porn on my pc. Only 100 pics involve samus. Not many ppl share your interest.
But many people likes to see Ridley’s “gun”. That I can assure you!
King Boo wrote:
It depends how the artist draws Samus, not like all Samus pictures are the same.
True, I sold a bunch of Samus photos, and most of them she was dressed!
I profit from all those nerds that wack to videogame and anime.
People who preach about how fictional character’s are so much hotter than IRL girls don’t realize it’s just because the artist can draw them as perfect as they want. A little annoying.
King Boo wrote:
It depends how the artist draws Samus, not like all Samus pictures are the same.
True, I sold a bunch of Samus photos, and most of them she was dressed!
I profit from all those nerds that wack to videogame and anime.
People who preach about how fictional character’s are so much hotter than IRL girls don’t realize it’s just because the artist can draw them as perfect as they want. A little annoying.
Yeah, maybe because some of them has fetish for cartoons, my brother has and he isn’t even a gamer.
I mean, I sell peach porn and Marge Simpson Porn, both of them sell wonderfully.
But not right now, I’m selling bulma pics more now, dunno why.
Red_Calibur9 this'll take some getting used to Rep: 91
Game Master wrote:
RIGHT AWAY.
Oh...yeah, MvC doesn’t allow porn.
Well...I can give you a free sample over MSN, but ya have to pay 1$ each from then on, capiche?
Game Master wrote:
RIGHT AWAY.
Oh...yeah, MvC doesn’t allow porn.
Well...I can give you a free sample over MSN, but ya have to pay 1$ each from then on, capiche?
Red_Calibur9 this'll take some getting used to Rep: 91
Game Master wrote:
Red_Calibur9 wrote:
Game Master wrote:
RIGHT AWAY.
Oh...yeah, MvC doesn’t allow porn.
Well...I can give you a free sample over MSN, but ya have to pay 1$ each from then on, capiche?
