The Ps3 supports better graphics and much larger games and the Wii being no better then Duck Hunter is a legitimet excuse since Duct Hunter is ghetto now. And with the way nintendo is going at marketing and the overly cheap systems since even thought it sold more then the Ps3 it didnt make as much money as it did it just might go into bankruptsy but nintendo is a powerful company and this is unlikley but hey people probely said the same thing about blockbuster and now look its loseing more and mroe money every year
__________________
PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time 
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 49,513
CidHOLY SHIT IT WAS LUPUS!
Rep: 112
I don’t see where you get off saying that the Wii is no better than duck hunt, see here’s something for you, The PS1 was a much better console than either the PS2 or the PS3. You wanna know why? Because it had much better games then either one of them.
the Wii is better then any of it’s predecessors, the reason? It has better games. The PS3 is a great console but it just isn’t worth the $600 price tag, the 360 is a great console but it just isn’t different enough from the X-Box. The Wii has a cheap price (which Nintendo is making a profit from, they could have given it to us for $100) and it’s different from any other console.
See, you say that the Wii isn’t going to last, but I know it will. The Wii will sell 4,000,000 console by the end of the year and by the end of 2007 it will have sold almost 10,000,000. the ps3 will be sitting at less then half and the 360 will be either about the same or just a bit over. By the year 2012 the Wii may have sold more then the PS2.
__________________
Rise of Shinra
Joined: 26 Aug 2005
Posts: 6,001
RageOverdosepublic class Me : yourMom
Rep: 38
Why do people slam the Wii and say PS3 is awesomesauce with graphics when only a generation ago, the PS2 was the less capable system and the PS fanboys were defending it by saying graphics don’t matter? Well, apparently they do.
Hypocrisy is a bad thing folks.
The Wii is doing the same thing the PS2 did, by being a system that appeals to a large audience and has a large slew of titles for gamers to play. Nintendo, however, fixed the holes in the PS2 by making a less buggy system, a power conservative system, and a new way to play, or so they hope it becomes that.
__________________

Haruhi demands you join Anime United!
Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 6,806
HALOOOOOOOOBeen crazy since the day I was born!
Rep: 38
I only remember of one era where the more powerful console won: the Super Nintendo/Genesis era. The NES was inferior to the Master System in terms of specs, and so was the PS1 to N64 and PS2 to the GameCube and Xbox. Yet they still won. So it just goes to show that graphics aren’t the most important thing.
__________________

Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 14,636
Aaron McKayThe drummer
Rep: 21
HALOOOOOOOO wrote:
I only remember of one era where the more powerful console won: the Super Nintendo/Genesis era. The NES was inferior to the Master System in terms of specs, and so was the PS1 to N64 and PS2 to the GameCube and Xbox. Yet they still won. So it just goes to show that graphics aren’t the most important thing.
Actually the Genisus was more powerful then the Super Nintendo yet it lost
__________________
<iframe src=“http://gamercard.xbox.com/REPLACE-THIS-WITH-YOUR-GAMERTAG.card” scrolling=“no” frameBorder=“0” height=“140” width=“204”>Put your gamertag here too.</iframe>
http://www.myspace.com/linkious

Joined: 02 May 2006
Posts: 6,806
HALOOOOOOOOBeen crazy since the day I was born!
Rep: 38
Aaron McKay wrote:
HALOOOOOOOO wrote:
I only remember of one era where the more powerful console won: the Super Nintendo/Genesis era. The NES was inferior to the Master System in terms of specs, and so was the PS1 to N64 and PS2 to the GameCube and Xbox. Yet they still won. So it just goes to show that graphics aren’t the most important thing.
Actually the Genisus was more powerful then the Super Nintendo yet it lost
No, only the clock speed was higher, so games were generally faster. Everything else was better on SNES.
__________________

Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 15,524
ramunemattBanned
Rep: 62
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
The Ps3 supports better graphics and much larger games and the Wii being no better then Duck Hunter is a legitimet excuse since Duct Hunter is ghetto now. And with the way nintendo is going at marketing and the overly cheap systems since even thought it sold more then the Ps3 it didnt make as much money as it did it just might go into bankruptsy but nintendo is a powerful company and this is unlikley but hey people probely said the same thing about blockbuster and now look its loseing more and mroe money every year
What the hell are you talking about? PS3 isn’t making ANY money and Sony is losing literally billions because of it. Nintendo profited from Wii on day 1, so I don’t know where you get the idea that the PS3 is doing better than Wii.
__________________
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”

Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,686
DurielUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 1
Sony loses $800 whenever they sell a PS3.
Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 15,524
ramunemattBanned
Rep: 62
Plus they lost a lot of money from the PSP too.
__________________
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”

Cid wrote:
I don’t see where you get off saying that the Wii is no better than duck hunt, see here’s something for you, The PS1 was a much better console than either the PS2 or the PS3. You wanna know why? Because it had much better games then either one of them.
the Wii is better then any of it’s predecessors, the reason? It has better games. The PS3 is a great console but it just isn’t worth the $600 price tag, the 360 is a great console but it just isn’t different enough from the X-Box. The Wii has a cheap price (which Nintendo is making a profit from, they could have given it to us for $100) and it’s different from any other console.
See, you say that the Wii isn’t going to last, but I know it will. The Wii will sell 4,000,000 console by the end of the year and by the end of 2007 it will have sold almost 10,000,000. the ps3 will be sitting at less then half and the 360 will be either about the same or just a bit over. By the year 2012 the Wii may have sold more then the PS2.
By 2012 the next Gen gameing systems will aready be made chances are the Wii will stop selling around 2009 or 2010 since its incredibly cheap prices will be bad in the long one since for one Nintendo hasent made the same profit sony and microsoft have because of it and when prices start droping Ps# will go from 600 to 500 to 400 but what will happen to the Wii it will go from 250 150 50 so by the time the Ps3 is halfway down the Wii will be almost nothing and yes more people will buy it but it wont profit nintendo
__________________
PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time 
ramunematt wrote:
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
The Ps3 supports better graphics and much larger games and the Wii being no better then Duck Hunter is a legitimet excuse since Duct Hunter is ghetto now. And with the way nintendo is going at marketing and the overly cheap systems since even thought it sold more then the Ps3 it didnt make as much money as it did it just might go into bankruptsy but nintendo is a powerful company and this is unlikley but hey people probely said the same thing about blockbuster and now look its loseing more and mroe money every year
What the hell are you talking about? PS3 isn’t making ANY money and Sony is losing literally billions because of it. Nintendo profited from Wii on day 1, so I don’t know where you get the idea that the PS3 is doing better than Wii.
thats obviously a bullshit rumor Sony would know they are going to lose money when they started selling the PS3 and did what nintendo did and use sweatshops but since Sony is makeing money they arent
__________________
PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time 
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 16,860
kev360SAMOŠ
Rep: 38
Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 15,524
ramunemattBanned
Rep: 62
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
The Ps3 supports better graphics and much larger games and the Wii being no better then Duck Hunter is a legitimet excuse since Duct Hunter is ghetto now. And with the way nintendo is going at marketing and the overly cheap systems since even thought it sold more then the Ps3 it didnt make as much money as it did it just might go into bankruptsy but nintendo is a powerful company and this is unlikley but hey people probely said the same thing about blockbuster and now look its loseing more and mroe money every year
What the hell are you talking about? PS3 isn’t making ANY money and Sony is losing literally billions because of it. Nintendo profited from Wii on day 1, so I don’t know where you get the idea that the PS3 is doing better than Wii.
thats obviously a bullshit rumor Sony would know they are going to lose money when they started selling the PS3 and did what nintendo did and use sweatshops but since Sony is makeing money they arent
WFT?!?! Sony is losing hundreds on each PS3 sold and Nintendo is actually making money on every Wii sold. On top of that, Wii already hit the 1 million mark and PS3 isn’t even at 400,000. How the hell is Nintendo not making money and Sony is?
__________________
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”

kev360 wrote:
ps3 lifespan only 3 years?
sony loosing $241.35/$306.85 on every ps3 sold.
old article, but... “We’re making money from day one”
None of those are acualy newswebsights find some from yahoo or msn or the sony websight and ill belive it
__________________
PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time 
ramunematt wrote:
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
The Ps3 supports better graphics and much larger games and the Wii being no better then Duck Hunter is a legitimet excuse since Duct Hunter is ghetto now. And with the way nintendo is going at marketing and the overly cheap systems since even thought it sold more then the Ps3 it didnt make as much money as it did it just might go into bankruptsy but nintendo is a powerful company and this is unlikley but hey people probely said the same thing about blockbuster and now look its loseing more and mroe money every year
What the hell are you talking about? PS3 isn’t making ANY money and Sony is losing literally billions because of it. Nintendo profited from Wii on day 1, so I don’t know where you get the idea that the PS3 is doing better than Wii.
thats obviously a bullshit rumor Sony would know they are going to lose money when they started selling the PS3 and did what nintendo did and use sweatshops but since Sony is makeing money they arent
WFT?!?! Sony is losing hundreds on each PS3 sold and Nintendo is actually making money on every Wii sold. On top of that, Wii already hit the 1 million mark and PS3 isn’t even at 400,000. How the hell is Nintendo not making money and Sony is?
No see when you sell something you get money for it you dont pay them to give it to them(witch nintendo will be doing soon)and the Wii is selling at 200 each and the ps3 is selling 600 each so if u add up the math the Ps3 got more money
__________________
PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time 
Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 16,860
kev360SAMOŠ
Rep: 38
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
kev360 wrote:
ps3 lifespan only 3 years?
sony loosing $241.35/$306.85 on every ps3 sold.
old article, but... “We’re making money from day one”
None of those are acualy newswebsights find some from yahoo or msn or the sony websight and ill belive it
lol. whatever you say. for gaming purposes, i tend to trust websights devoted to gaming more then standard news sights.
only post...
__________________

Edited 05 Dec 2006 00:30 by kev360
kev360 wrote:
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
kev360 wrote:
ps3 lifespan only 3 years?
sony loosing $241.35/$306.85 on every ps3 sold.
old article, but... “We’re making money from day one”
None of those are acualy newswebsights find some from yahoo or msn or the sony websight and ill belive it
lol. whatever you say. for gaming purposes, i tend to trust websights devoted to gaming more then standard news sights.
only post...
well that aint good since if there devoted to gameing there going to take sides
__________________
PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time 
Edited 05 Dec 2006 07:59 by Read this if your stupid 2
Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 32,949
NerevarSavior Gone Chaotic
Rep: 72
Cid wrote:
I don’t see where you get off saying that the Wii is no better than duck hunt, see here’s something for you, The PS1 was a much better console than either the PS2 or the PS3. You wanna know why? Because it had much better games then either one of them.
the Wii is better then any of it’s predecessors, the reason? It has better games. The PS3 is a great console but it just isn’t worth the $600 price tag, the 360 is a great console but it just isn’t different enough from the X-Box. The Wii has a cheap price (which Nintendo is making a profit from, they could have given it to us for $100) and it’s different from any other console.
See, you say that the Wii isn’t going to last, but I know it will. The Wii will sell 4,000,000 console by the end of the year and by the end of 2007 it will have sold almost 10,000,000. the ps3 will be sitting at less then half and the 360 will be either about the same or just a bit over. By the year 2012 the Wii may have sold more then the PS2.
......... haha.......
:no comment:
__________________

Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 16,860
kev360SAMOŠ
Rep: 38
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote:
kev360 wrote:
ps3 lifespan only 3 years?
sony loosing $241.35/$306.85 on every ps3 sold.
old article, but... “We’re making money from day one”
None of those are acualy newswebsights find some from yahoo or msn or the sony websight and ill belive it
lol. whatever you say. for gaming purposes, i tend to trust websights devoted to gaming more then standard news sights.
only post...
well that aint good since if there devoted to gameing there going to take sides
dude, 2 of them are official quotes... it doesn’t matter if they took sides, the representatives still said that stuff. as for the other one, engadget is very unbiased. want more links for that one though?
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6161925.html
http://blogs.business2.com/utilitybelt/2006/11/sonys_loss_is_a.html
http://www.bargainshare.com/index.php?s=fda55fefb8a690a72ab1498d0deb1872&showtopic=92507&pid=769270&st=0&#entry769270
http://www.betanews.com/article/PlayStation_3_Loses_as_Much_as_307_Per_Unit_Sold/1163688668
http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2006/11/16/ps3-loses-up-to-306-per-unit-xbox-360-profits-76-per-sale.htm
i have now provided 6 links. i think its safe to say its all over the internet, meaning its not just something some biased dude came up with. show me some links saying sony is not loosing money on every system sold. until then, my links beat no links.
__________________

Edited 05 Dec 2006 09:55 by kev360
Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 14,636
Aaron McKayThe drummer
Rep: 21
rolls eyes at everyone. lol
__________________
<iframe src=“http://gamercard.xbox.com/REPLACE-THIS-WITH-YOUR-GAMERTAG.card” scrolling=“no” frameBorder=“0” height=“140” width=“204”>Put your gamertag here too.</iframe>
http://www.myspace.com/linkious
