lol, no one reads anymore.

Atresac wrote:

Etain wrote:

Atresac wrote: proof: this forum has the least number of pages out of any forum on the whole site.

Well I always figure there’s no one to have a serious discussion of literature with.

For example, if I go all university style and start talking about Foucault’s analysis of Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon and how it relates to Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”....

I think I’d lose my audience pretty quick .

Who let you out of the kitchen?

Mary Wollstonecraft. You’re really behind the times. As in 2.5 centuries behind .

those are some big words coming from someone who should be in the kitchen. not reading.

your books will never getcha anywhere girl, y’need to assept that.

Atresac wrote: those are some big words coming from someone who should be in the kitchen. not reading.

your books will never getcha anywhere girl, y’need to assept that.

I have a brain and I’m not afraid to use it .

But it sounds like you could stand to pick up a book *cough*.

etain

just stop your sass

k?

k

Atresac wrote: etain

just stop your sass

k?

k

Lol. Don’t dish it out if you can’t handle it.

you started it by challenging me with all of yer fancy book-talk.

Etain wrote:

Atresac wrote: proof: this forum has the least number of pages out of any forum on the whole site.

Well I always figure there’s no one to have a serious discussion of literature with.

For example, if I go all university style and start talking about Foucault’s analysis of Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon and how it relates to Joseph Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”....

I think I’d lose my audience pretty quick .

Ya..I’m sure there’s lots of people you think I’m rather book-learned, but you still lost me
I know Foucault (and by “know” I mean we’ve gone over some of his stuff in a few of my classes and I don’t remember any of it anymore) but that’s about it

SOTW Theme Voting* SOTW Management* SOTW Winners