That’s very deep wolfy. Kind of confusing in some spots, and I could be wrong, but it looks like you changed point of view in the third paragraph, first sentence just a little bit. But, very good, very well thought and carried out.
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
That’s very deep wolfy. Kind of confusing in some spots, and I could be wrong, but it looks like you changed point of view in the third paragraph, first sentence just a little bit. But, very good, very well thought and carried out.
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
That’s very deep wolfy. Kind of confusing in some spots, and I could be wrong, but it looks like you changed point of view in the third paragraph, first sentence just a little bit. But, very good, very well thought and carried out.
thank you ty.
will attempt to address the untidy paragraph 3.
Yeah, it’s late at night so I might have a second look at it tomorrow, but I think it’s very well executed; even if it is kind of confusing, it helps add onto it a lot, so don’t change that.
Though, you might want to switch the %u2019 codes to ', unless I’m the only one seeing it done that way. (has done that to me several times using notepad, actually)
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
That’s very deep wolfy. Kind of confusing in some spots, and I could be wrong, but it looks like you changed point of view in the third paragraph, first sentence just a little bit. But, very good, very well thought and carried out.
thank you ty.
will attempt to address the untidy paragraph 3.
Yeah, it’s late at night so I might have a second look at it tomorrow, but I think it’s very well executed; even if it is kind of confusing, it helps add onto it a lot, so don’t change that.
Though, you might want to switch the %u2019 codes to ', unless I’m the only one seeing it done that way. (has done that to me several times using notepad, actually)
yeah i don’t know why it replaced the ' with streams of code. i will fix it up soon.