the font isnt the bad thing there, its mainly placement of the different items and correct use of tools that makes a good sig. and get a dimention that your good with, so you dont have a ton of differently proportioned sigs... i personally use the 400x95, but i have also used 300x150, 400x200, and 400x150... those are all pretty good, im not sure what anyone else uses though...
Skull_Kid wrote:
the font isnt the bad thing there, its mainly placement of the different items and correct use of tools that makes a good sig. and get a dimention that your good with, so you dont have a ton of differently proportioned sigs... i personally use the 400x95, but i have also used 300x150, 400x200, and 400x150... those are all pretty good, im not sure what anyone else uses though...
it started out as a test with brushes but then it became this so...lol
That much is certain. YOur typograpy needa a lot of work, but you have achieved a huge step forward with this sig that I feel compelled to shake your hand and tell you well done.
firewolf81 wrote:
Definatly a huge improvement over your last ones.
That much is certain. YOur typograpy needa a lot of work, but you have achieved a huge step forward with this sig that I feel compelled to shake your hand and tell you well done.