Our Troops Murdered 90,000 Civilians?

According to Sean they have.
Are our troops murderers or is there more to this?Are civilian casualties an unavoidable part/consequence of war?
This is not a question of whether or not you support the war.

Sean of the Living wrote:

Online Predator wrote:

Sean of the Living wrote: It’s all about our troops isn’t it? Not caring at all about the 90,000 or so civillian casualties in Iraq. If you’re going to be a one sided fascist dumbshit who goes for his country’s troops purely because they come from the same nation as you do you’re a fucking moron.

I support the Iraqi people fighting for their families in Iraq.
Do you know why our troops volunteer to go? Obviously not. They go for the civilians over there. More than you can ever do.
It’s pathetic you talk about who we should support when you don’t even go out and support them. Why don’t you go to Iraq and die for the civilians just like our troops are doing.
You should look at my respect thread. Notice in most of the pictures there are civilians? Notice they’re all kids?

Die for the civillians? They’ve been doing a pretty shitty job of it. 90,000 civillian casualties to (supposedly) find weapons of mass destruction that weren’t there. The reason why you signed up doesn’t have anything to do with whether your side is the right one or not either.

Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass

http://www.iraqbodycount.org/

A body count doesn’t prove the troops are murderers. You don’t realize that civilian casualties happen in every way and we do everything we can to avoid them.

Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass

Online Predator wrote: A body count doesn’t prove the troops are murderers. You don’t realize that civilian casualties happen in every way and we do everything we can to avoid them.

“In recent weeks, Katzenberger and other pilots have dramatically increased their use of helicopter-fired missiles against enemy fighters, often in densely populated areas. Since late March, the military has fired more than 200 Hellfire missiles in the capital, compared with just six missiles fired in the previous three months.

The military says the tactic has saved the lives of ground troops and prevented attacks, but the strikes have also killed and wounded civilians. (WP 23 May)"

You can do better than that.

SA-X wrote:

Online Predator wrote: A body count doesn’t prove the troops are murderers. You don’t realize that civilian casualties happen in every way and we do everything we can to avoid them.

“In recent weeks, Katzenberger and other pilots have dramatically increased their use of helicopter-fired missiles against enemy fighters, often in densely populated areas. Since late March, the military has fired more than 200 Hellfire missiles in the capital, compared with just six missiles fired in the previous three months.

The military says the tactic has saved the lives of ground troops and prevented attacks, but the strikes have also killed and wounded civilians. (WP 23 May)"

You can do better than that.

Unfortunately that is part of war. The government sometimes has to choose between it’s own people or someone else’s. It happened in WWII.
It’s not beautiful but it can’t be changed.

Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass

I wouldn’t believe that your troops are murderers, but that they have no care for civilians either way. As if they were watermelons, just floating in the breeze.

Neon man you have know idea what are army is like do you. right know there in the cleanup over there they send in the army the lowest rank to do a sweep of every building. They cant take risks.

R.I.P Darren Reynolds

your also from england of course you think we dont care about civilians because your army is to pussy and they call us to help fight most of your wars

R.I.P Darren Reynolds

Our troops killed a puppy. =[

yes your troops killed innocent
but in a way thats a common thing for war
its terrible, wars terrible
there not murders, there soldiers

i dont think there actions are honorable or good
but its what there paid to do

they have to or they dont have to but its smart to kill it because it could attack you

R.I.P Darren Reynolds

i think its honorable they do it for our protection

R.I.P Darren Reynolds

You dumbasses its mainly cus of suicide bombers

HELLS AS5ASSIN6 wrote: i think its honorable they do it for our protection

...
oh yah i forgot
random civilians are going to go into north america and start killing us all
thats bullcrap
this isnt about protection anymore

HELLS AS5ASSIN6 wrote: they have to or they dont have to but its smart to kill it because it could attack you

....a puppy is going to attack you?

Dont think this will show so

R.I.P Darren Reynolds

Di5turbed wrote: You dumbasses its mainly cus of suicide bombers

i think scuicide bombers would be considered terrorists not civilians

most of the casualties happened at the start though
there were alot of accidents becouse troops couldnt tell who was who, terrosim is a sticky situation

like a few weeks ago a canadian gunner shot down two children in a car becouse it was heading towards there convoy and the gunner re-acted to soon

so most casualties are do to accidents
while some arnt, but most are

http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=2848330

R.I.P Darren Reynolds

HELLS AS5ASSIN6 wrote: http://myspacetv.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=2848330

in all honesty i dont enjoy supporting them
i do support them, but even though its there job they kill thousends
and i stated its there job, and its a kill or be killed situation, which is why i support it
but still
it would be a better place if no one had any military

Wtf? Those were civilians caught in the line of fire or blown up by suicide bombers.
The enemy even capture civilians and forces them to do suicide bombings.

the21gamer wrote:

ramunematt wrote: Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.

Wtf...