Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 8,704
SA-XCorrupted...
Rep: 26
Too bad that a few rotten apples ruined the whole bunch.
See you on the other side.
__________________

Yeah, I probably shouldn’t have reported him, I mean who cares if Bjarne ends up in jail because of what he posted, not my problem.
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 22,332
DingoThat's FAPTASTIC!
Rep: 85
Another pissy member whine his ass off about the poor state of things.
Hate to tell you bub, but you helped create this mess..you were no angel and as such, contributed to the sad state of affairs that Off topic has fallen victim to.
Before moaning about others DeathSpartan..look at your own actions first.
__________________
LIFE’S A SHIT SANDWICH..EAT IT OR STARVE!
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 8,704
SA-XCorrupted...
Rep: 26
Too bad an attention whore did the act in the first place, which led to a good person being banned.
__________________

Agreed, she does cry out for attention a little much...
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 12,253
xexediAddict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 46
what I don’t understand is why that would bother any one
pluto wrote:
what I don’t understand is why that would bother any one
It only bothers me because it shows me that she can be desperate at times, I’ve known a lot of desperate people, and they end up doing some very unfavorable things.
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 12,253
xexediAddict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 46
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
what I don’t understand is why that would bother any one
It only bothers me because it shows me that she can be desperate at times, I’ve known a lot of desperate people, and they end up doing some very unfavorable things.
But why would it bother you and BTW the pick of her wos not a good thing to post. I did see it.
But doesn’t bother me in any great way.
Its her cheers and Deathspartan know it would not bother her posting it.
But I don’t think he shod have done it ether
Edited 21 Aug 2007 03:36 by xexedi
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
what I don’t understand is why that would bother any one
It only bothers me because it shows me that she can be desperate at times, I’ve known a lot of desperate people, and they end up doing some very unfavorable things.
But why would it bother you and BTW the pick of her wos not a good thing to post. I did see it.
But doesn’t bother me in any great way.
Its her cheers and dethspectrum know it would not bother her posting it.
But I don’t think he shod have done it ether
Because she’s a minor, and as I have stated many times if the wrong people saw those pictures Bjarne could have ended up in jail for promoting child pornography due to it not being removed.
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 12,253
xexediAddict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 46
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
what I don’t understand is why that would bother any one
It only bothers me because it shows me that she can be desperate at times, I’ve known a lot of desperate people, and they end up doing some very unfavorable things.
But why would it bother you and BTW the pick of her wos not a good thing to post. I did see it.
But doesn’t bother me in any great way.
Its her cheers and dethspectrum know it would not bother her posting it.
But I don’t think he shod have done it ether
Because she’s a minor, and as I have stated many times if the wrong people saw those pictures Bjarne could have ended up in jail for promoting child pornography due to it not being removed.
That’s why we have moderators.
but she wos not actually showing anything Thank god.
So I don’t think it was against the rulls just a bit un tast full for a girl to do
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
what I don’t understand is why that would bother any one
It only bothers me because it shows me that she can be desperate at times, I’ve known a lot of desperate people, and they end up doing some very unfavorable things.
But why would it bother you and BTW the pick of her wos not a good thing to post. I did see it.
But doesn’t bother me in any great way.
Its her cheers and dethspectrum know it would not bother her posting it.
But I don’t think he shod have done it ether
Because she’s a minor, and as I have stated many times if the wrong people saw those pictures Bjarne could have ended up in jail for promoting child pornography due to it not being removed.
That’s why we have moderators.
but she wos not actually showing anything Thank god.
So I don’t think it was against the rulls just a bit un tast full for a girl to do
*sigh* I’m done talking about this. I’ve realized by now that you either agree it was pornography or you don’t and there is nothing I can do to make you see it otherwise. I will tell you that the cops would see it as child pornography because police have a very liberal view of what child pornography entales. I don’t feel like discussing this with you.
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 12,253
xexediAddict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 46
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
what I don’t understand is why that would bother any one
It only bothers me because it shows me that she can be desperate at times, I’ve known a lot of desperate people, and they end up doing some very unfavorable things.
But why would it bother you and BTW the pick of her wos not a good thing to post. I did see it.
But doesn’t bother me in any great way.
Its her cheers and dethspectrum know it would not bother her posting it.
But I don’t think he shod have done it ether
Because she’s a minor, and as I have stated many times if the wrong people saw those pictures Bjarne could have ended up in jail for promoting child pornography due to it not being removed.
That’s why we have moderators.
but she wos not actually showing anything Thank god.
So I don’t think it was against the rulls just a bit un tast full for a girl to do
*sigh* I’m done talking about this. I’ve realized by now that you either agree it was pornography or you don’t and there is nothing I can do to make you see it otherwise. I will tell you that the cops would see it as child pornography because police have a very liberal view of what child pornography entales. I don’t feel like discussing this with you.
OK well I was not having a go at you.
Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 22,332
DingoThat's FAPTASTIC!
Rep: 85
I agree with Derek...I saw the image on Skits own site and that fine...her website, her choice...but on here...I get worried as a MOD cause I could in part be held accountable for letting such a image be seen on here..She is a minor and that image could be construed by officials, such as the Feds as Child pornography..and myself being a older man...well, I don’t need to tell you what the punishments are for a childcare worker who could be seen as indulging in kiddy porn
Its just too risky...for everyone over the age of 18 to have that image on here.
__________________
LIFE’S A SHIT SANDWICH..EAT IT OR STARVE!
firewolf81 wrote:
I agree with Derek...I saw the image on Skits own site and that fine...her website, her choice...but on here...I get worried as a MOD cause I could in part be held accountable for letting such a image be seen on here..She is a minor and that image could be construed by officials, such as the Feds as Child pornography..and myself being a older man...well, I don’t need to tell you what the punishments are for a childcare worker who could be seen as indulging in kiddy porn
Its just too risky...for everyone over the age of 18 to have that image on here.
Most definately agreed there Firewolf.
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 12,253
xexediAddict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 46
firewolf81 wrote:
I agree with Derek...I saw the image on Skits own site and that fine...her website, her choice...but on here...I get worried as a MOD cause I could in part be held accountable for letting such a image be seen on here..She is a minor and that image could be construed by officials, such as the Feds as Child pornography..and myself being a older man...well, I don’t need to tell you what the punishments are for a childcare worker who could be seen as indulging in kiddy porn
Its just too risky...for everyone over the age of 18 to have that image on here.
I agree that has a mod you shod have done something for the reasons you have stated.
What I don’t get is why it bothers any one.
The only ppl that should be bathed are you mods and I wouled say her mum & dad
pluto wrote:
firewolf81 wrote:
I agree with Derek...I saw the image on Skits own site and that fine...her website, her choice...but on here...I get worried as a MOD cause I could in part be held accountable for letting such a image be seen on here..She is a minor and that image could be construed by officials, such as the Feds as Child pornography..and myself being a older man...well, I don’t need to tell you what the punishments are for a childcare worker who could be seen as indulging in kiddy porn
Its just too risky...for everyone over the age of 18 to have that image on here.
I agree that has a mod you shod have done something for the reasons you have stated.
What I don’t get is why it bothers any one.
The only ppl that should be bathed are you mods and I wouled say her mum & dad
Because a lot of us on this site don’t want to see her get hurt, and it’s a fact that there are perverted people on the internet looking for any chance to rape a cute young girl like Skittles.
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 12,253
xexediAddict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 46
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
firewolf81 wrote:
I agree with Derek...I saw the image on Skits own site and that fine...her website, her choice...but on here...I get worried as a MOD cause I could in part be held accountable for letting such a image be seen on here..She is a minor and that image could be construed by officials, such as the Feds as Child pornography..and myself being a older man...well, I don’t need to tell you what the punishments are for a childcare worker who could be seen as indulging in kiddy porn
Its just too risky...for everyone over the age of 18 to have that image on here.
I agree that has a mod you shod have done something for the reasons you have stated.
What I don’t get is why it bothers any one.
The only ppl that should be bathed are you mods and I wouled say her mum & dad
Because a lot of us on this site don’t want to see her get hurt, and it’s a fact that there are perverted people on the internet looking for any chance to rape a cute young girl like Skittles.
good answer. Just as long as she knows that your doing it coz you care.
I do think shes cool but as an older man I would prefer her not to do stuff like that as it can make it difficult to speak to her
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
firewolf81 wrote:
I agree with Derek...I saw the image on Skits own site and that fine...her website, her choice...but on here...I get worried as a MOD cause I could in part be held accountable for letting such a image be seen on here..She is a minor and that image could be construed by officials, such as the Feds as Child pornography..and myself being a older man...well, I don’t need to tell you what the punishments are for a childcare worker who could be seen as indulging in kiddy porn
Its just too risky...for everyone over the age of 18 to have that image on here.
I agree that has a mod you shod have done something for the reasons you have stated.
What I don’t get is why it bothers any one.
The only ppl that should be bathed are you mods and I wouled say her mum & dad
Because a lot of us on this site don’t want to see her get hurt, and it’s a fact that there are perverted people on the internet looking for any chance to rape a cute young girl like Skittles.
good answer. Just as long as she knows that your doing it coz you care.
I do think shes cool but as an older man I would prefer her not to do stuff like that as it can make it difficult to speak to her
Completely agreed there, it’s hard to talk civily with somebody when they do things that make you shake your head in shame.
Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 12,253
xexediAddict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 46
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
DareDevil Justice wrote:
pluto wrote:
firewolf81 wrote:
I agree with Derek...I saw the image on Skits own site and that fine...her website, her choice...but on here...I get worried as a MOD cause I could in part be held accountable for letting such a image be seen on here..She is a minor and that image could be construed by officials, such as the Feds as Child pornography..and myself being a older man...well, I don’t need to tell you what the punishments are for a childcare worker who could be seen as indulging in kiddy porn
Its just too risky...for everyone over the age of 18 to have that image on here.
I agree that has a mod you shod have done something for the reasons you have stated.
What I don’t get is why it bothers any one.
The only ppl that should be bathed are you mods and I wouled say her mum & dad
Because a lot of us on this site don’t want to see her get hurt, and it’s a fact that there are perverted people on the internet looking for any chance to rape a cute young girl like Skittles.
good answer. Just as long as she knows that your doing it coz you care.
I do think shes cool but as an older man I would prefer her not to do stuff like that as it can make it difficult to speak to her
Completely agreed there, it’s hard to talk civily with somebody when they do things that make you shake your head in shame.
yea 
Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 49,513
CidHOLY SHIT IT WAS LUPUS!
Rep: 112
The ban on Jon’s Deathspartan117 account has been lifted.
__________________
Rise of Shinra