| 17 May 2009 06:33 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61  Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias nli wrote:
A fetus is not a sentient being. It’s not murder, it’s like saying using Jenola is murder.
Its a living thing, maybe not completely a human yet, but in fast time it will be. Its the equivelent of going back in time and stabbing a woman in the stomach so the baby dies to kill someone in the future.
By definition no, it isn’t a living thing.
Its actually many many many living things. Same as all multi-cellular organisms. But its a human in production. | | | | 17 May 2009 06:34 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 27 Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 3,163 OFFLINE | It is a living being. ---
  | | | 17 May 2009 06:35 pm |
hay u gais lol Rep: 86 Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 25,425 OFFLINE | King Boo wrote:
Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias nli wrote:
A fetus is not a sentient being. It’s not murder, it’s like saying using Jenola is murder.
Its a living thing, maybe not completely a human yet, but in fast time it will be. Its the equivelent of going back in time and stabbing a woman in the stomach so the baby dies to kill someone in the future.
By definition no, it isn’t a living thing.
Its actually many many many living things. Same as all multi-cellular organisms. But its a human in production.
*rubs temples*
So your saying because it COULD be a living being, abortion shouldn’t be legal?
That’s like saying that children should be punished like adults because they will be adults someday.
 | | | 17 May 2009 06:36 pm |
hay u gais lol Rep: 86Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 25,425 OFFLINE | Geass wrote:
It is a living being.
So is a parasite.
-.-
| | | 17 May 2009 06:38 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias nli wrote:
A fetus is not a sentient being. It’s not murder, it’s like saying using Jenola is murder.
Its a living thing, maybe not completely a human yet, but in fast time it will be. Its the equivelent of going back in time and stabbing a woman in the stomach so the baby dies to kill someone in the future.
By definition no, it isn’t a living thing.
Its actually many many many living things. Same as all multi-cellular organisms. But its a human in production.
*rubs temples*
So your saying because it COULD be a living being, abortion shouldn’t be legal?
That’s like saying that children should be punished like adults because they will be adults someday.
Were dealing with life here. Its taking away a life. Your saying this is completely ok with you?
If so, your a sick little boy. Moderated 17 May 2009 08:13 pm by Etain | | | 17 May 2009 06:44 pm |
hay u gais lol Rep: 86Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 25,425 OFFLINE | King Boo wrote:
Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias nli wrote:
A fetus is not a sentient being. It’s not murder, it’s like saying using Jenola is murder.
Its a living thing, maybe not completely a human yet, but in fast time it will be. Its the equivelent of going back in time and stabbing a woman in the stomach so the baby dies to kill someone in the future.
By definition no, it isn’t a living thing.
Its actually many many many living things. Same as all multi-cellular organisms. But its a human in production.
*rubs temples*
So your saying because it COULD be a living being, abortion shouldn’t be legal?
That’s like saying that children should be punished like adults because they will be adults someday.
Were dealing with life here. Its taking away a life. Your saying this is completely ok with you?
-took away stupid picture-
If so, your a sick little boy.
...
Your rather stupid aren’t you.
Yes, I love seeing aborted fetuses. They are awesome.
No, of course I fucking don’t you idiot. I am pro- choice not pro- death
Pro-Lifers really are stupid sometimes. You know, I bet you support the death penalty.
| | | 17 May 2009 06:45 pm |
Knight of Vermilion Rep: 68 Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 52,704 ONLINE | King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped. ---
 | | | 17 May 2009 06:49 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop. | | | 17 May 2009 06:49 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Haylias nli wrote:
A fetus is not a sentient being. It’s not murder, it’s like saying using Jenola is murder.
Its a living thing, maybe not completely a human yet, but in fast time it will be. Its the equivelent of going back in time and stabbing a woman in the stomach so the baby dies to kill someone in the future.
By definition no, it isn’t a living thing.
Its actually many many many living things. Same as all multi-cellular organisms. But its a human in production.
*rubs temples*
So your saying because it COULD be a living being, abortion shouldn’t be legal?
That’s like saying that children should be punished like adults because they will be adults someday.
Were dealing with life here. Its taking away a life. Your saying this is completely ok with you?
-took away stupid picture-
If so, your a sick little boy.
...
Your rather stupid aren’t you.
Yes, I love seeing aborted fetuses. They are awesome.
No, of course I fucking don’t you idiot. I am pro- choice not pro- death
Pro-Lifers really are stupid sometimes. You know, I bet you support the death penalty.
Pro-choice for death. | | | 17 May 2009 06:50 pm |
hay u gais lol Rep: 86Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 25,425 OFFLINE | King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
So, you hold yourself up as the anchor of life and death?
| | | 17 May 2009 06:50 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
So, you hold yourself up as the anchor of life and death?
I what? | | | 17 May 2009 06:51 pm |
Knight of Vermilion Rep: 68Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 52,704 ONLINE | King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
| | | 17 May 2009 06:52 pm |
hay u gais lol Rep: 86Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 25,425 OFFLINE | 1) Your so freaking stupid. Seriously.
2) Your saying that you should decide for the woman, and it’s her own fault if she got raped and she should deal with the consequences.
You sound like some Islamic Extremist. ---
| | | 17 May 2009 06:52 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
Life isnt fair. But killing is wrong. | | | 17 May 2009 06:52 pm |
hay u gais lol Rep: 86Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 25,425 OFFLINE | King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
Life isnt fair. But killing is wrong.
So I am guessing you are a vegetarian?
| | | 17 May 2009 06:53 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Haylias wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
Life isnt fair. But killing is wrong.
So I am guessing you are a vegetarian?
No. Killing of people is usually what that reffers to. | | | 17 May 2009 06:54 pm |
Knight of Vermilion Rep: 68Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 52,704 ONLINE | King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
Life isnt fair. But killing is wrong.
So is forcing the girl to go through pregnancy. Better yet, let’s toss something else in, a little scenario:
A young girl is raped and impregnated. If she carries through with the child, she will die certainly and the child will have a low chance of survival. She does not want to go through with the pregnancy, for obvious reasons. You would force her to go through with the pregnancy?
Oh and something else:
If it is considered murder (killing of a human being), should we jail all of those who chose to have abortions?
Last edited 17 May 2009 06:55 pm by Tyreaus Dreacon | | | 17 May 2009 06:59 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | If I had a daughter who was raped and got pregnant then I would take her to the doctor and tell him to treat her for any injuries, and to make sure I was only taking here home, no one else. | | | 17 May 2009 07:01 pm |
Knight of Vermilion Rep: 68Joined: 06 Sep 2005 Posts: 52,704 ONLINE | King Boo wrote:
If I had a daughter who was raped and got pregnant then I would take her to the doctor and tell him to treat her for any injuries, and to make sure I was only taking here home, no one else.
That’s not an answer. Re-read my previous question. Would you force that young girl to go through the pregnancy?
| | | 17 May 2009 07:02 pm |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo wrote:
If I had a daughter who was raped and got pregnant then I would take her to the doctor and tell him to treat her for any injuries, and to make sure I was only taking here home, no one else.
That’s not an answer. Re-read my previous question. Would you force that young girl to go through the pregnancy?
Read what I just wrote. I wasnt answering anything. | | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
|
Politics 