Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
So, Crys, I’m curious; what about the case that the abortion saves the life of the mother?
ok, lets say u are the mother, you would rather take somebody elses life so you can live? take their life before they can truly start to live? take away their chance of living? it would be better to have the kid and atleast take a shot at both of you living than actually just killing the baby right away without even giving them a chance
Consider a chance that:
A: The mother did not actually choose to have the child (whether this is rape or otherwise)
B: If the child is not aborted, it still has a low chance of survival, which could mean two deaths
No change of opinions?
nope.
A)if it wasnt a rape its her own fault and if it was, well just put it up for adoption instead of killing it
B: well they should still let it have any shot it has left in life. they shouldnt take away its life if it has any chance left
In the case of A, you seemed to have forgotten that the girl would die if she went through with it.
And the case of B, you know that means the mother dying on the off-chance that the child might live, right?
I am against abortion, but I feel that it’s not our decision to make. That’s the child parents decision between them and God. I think if laws are made they should be made to help the mother find all available options and if, at the last, she decides to abort (kill) the baby then make sure it’s done properly in a medical facility and before a certain time of gestation.
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
well yeah. its still wrong to take the life of a human being.
king boo: sorry for leaving and not being able to support you in the argument.
--- "Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
Life isnt fair. But killing is wrong.
So is forcing the girl to go through pregnancy. Better yet, let’s toss something else in, a little scenario:
A young girl is raped and impregnated. If she carries through with the child, she will die certainly and the child will have a low chance of survival. She does not want to go through with the pregnancy, for obvious reasons. You would force her to go through with the pregnancy?
Oh and something else:
If it is considered murder (killing of a human being), should we jail all of those who chose to have abortions?
yes
--- "Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
well yeah. its still wrong to take the life of a human being.
king boo: sorry for leaving and not being able to support you in the argument.
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
Life isnt fair. But killing is wrong.
So is forcing the girl to go through pregnancy. Better yet, let’s toss something else in, a little scenario:
A young girl is raped and impregnated. If she carries through with the child, she will die certainly and the child will have a low chance of survival. She does not want to go through with the pregnancy, for obvious reasons. You would force her to go through with the pregnancy?
Oh and something else:
If it is considered murder (killing of a human being), should we jail all of those who chose to have abortions?
yes
What? Excuse me, but which one is that answer towards?
Ill Be Bach wrote:
Depends on the situation. So I said good. If the family is unable to afford a baby/child it is best to have it aborted. If not, and they are ready for a baby, then they should keep it.
take it to the fire station before 72 hours are up
--- "Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
So, Crys, I’m curious; what about the case that the abortion saves the life of the mother?
ok, lets say u are the mother, you would rather take somebody elses life so you can live? take their life before they can truly start to live? take away their chance of living? it would be better to have the kid and atleast take a shot at both of you living than actually just killing the baby right away without even giving them a chance
Consider a chance that:
A: The mother did not actually choose to have the child (whether this is rape or otherwise)
B: If the child is not aborted, it still has a low chance of survival, which could mean two deaths
No change of opinions?
nope.
A)if it wasnt a rape its her own fault and if it was, well just put it up for adoption instead of killing it
B: well they should still let it have any shot it has left in life. they shouldnt take away its life if it has any chance left
In the case of A, you seemed to have forgotten that the girl would die if she went through with it.
And the case of B, you know that means the mother dying on the off-chance that the child might live, right?
well whoever lived could either take care of it or take it to a firestation
B: thats what mothers are supposed to do. and it isnt 100% sure that the mother will die. you never know a miracle could happen. (i mean one of those like 1 out of 100 chance)
--- "Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
I am against abortion, but I feel that it’s not our decision to make. That’s the child parents decision between them and God. I think if laws are made they should be made to help the mother find all available options and if, at the last, she decides to abort (kill) the baby then make sure it’s done properly in a medical facility and before a certain time of gestation.
That’s pretty much my belief in a nutshell, so people aren’t assuming I support murder or something insane. Thank you Chilly.
I am against abortion, but I feel that it’s not our decision to make. That’s the child parents decision between them and God. I think if laws are made they should be made to help the mother find all available options and if, at the last, she decides to abort (kill) the baby then make sure it’s done properly in a medical facility and before a certain time of gestation.
nope. its not up to us who lives and who dies. its up to fate
--- "Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:
King Boo: First of all, I thought you were told NOT to post that as a picture. Secondly, I guess you support forcing women through pregnancy if they are raped.
Its the womans duty to protect her baby. So yes, even rape pregnancys should be carried out, and then maybe put up for adoption, not killed, even before they fully develop.
Hah, well, you’re a sick little boy as well, wanting to put a women through the ordeals of a pregnancy that was forced upon them, and having to take care of the baby (whether through adoption or whatever else), along with the pains of being raped to begin with.
Life isnt fair. But killing is wrong.
So is forcing the girl to go through pregnancy. Better yet, let’s toss something else in, a little scenario:
A young girl is raped and impregnated. If she carries through with the child, she will die certainly and the child will have a low chance of survival. She does not want to go through with the pregnancy, for obvious reasons. You would force her to go through with the pregnancy?
Oh and something else:
If it is considered murder (killing of a human being), should we jail all of those who chose to have abortions?
yes
What? Excuse me, but which one is that answer towards?
to both
--- "Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
Politics 
