Read This If Your Mom Sucked My Dick wrote:
Oh here we go people not seeing the big picture. When you give tax cuts to the big business owners it gives them the opprotunity to expand and make more money which creates jobs for people which sounds like a better idea then giving everyone but the rich tax cuts so the government loses more money then it already is.
*Sigh*..Have you not seen what giving big businesses tax cuts does to a nation’s economy?..You’re aware of the bailout, right?..If we give tax cuts to the poor and middle class,people will have more money to spend,thus fueling the economy from the ground up because as we all know, the trickle down theory does not work..
Thats because a idiot like Bush did it. Reagen did it and it worked wondefuly so someone like McCain could probebly do it to. When you give tax cuts to middle and low class you give away more money then you get so that would hurt the economy.
Read This If Your Mom Sucked My Dick wrote:
Oh here we go people not seeing the big picture. When you give tax cuts to the big business owners it gives them the opprotunity to expand and make more money which creates jobs for people which sounds like a better idea then giving everyone but the rich tax cuts so the government loses more money then it already is.
*Sigh*..Have you not seen what giving big businesses tax cuts does to a nation’s economy?..You’re aware of the bailout, right?..If we give tax cuts to the poor and middle class,people will have more money to spend,thus fueling the economy from the ground up because as we all know, the trickle down theory does not work..
Thats because a idiot like Bush did it. Reagen did it and it worked wondefuly so someone like McCain could probebly do it to. When you give tax cuts to middle and low class you give away more money then you get so that would hurt the economy.
Reagan did not help the economy at all..He made decisions like he had a tree that grew money and put us into a huge debt which wasn’t cleaned up until Clinton left the White House..
And how do you figure that giving tax cuts to the middle and lower class hurts the economy if it really hasn’t been done yet?
Read This If Your Mom Sucked My Dick wrote:
Oh here we go people not seeing the big picture. When you give tax cuts to the big business owners it gives them the opprotunity to expand and make more money which creates jobs for people which sounds like a better idea then giving everyone but the rich tax cuts so the government loses more money then it already is.
*Sigh*..Have you not seen what giving big businesses tax cuts does to a nation’s economy?..You’re aware of the bailout, right?..If we give tax cuts to the poor and middle class,people will have more money to spend,thus fueling the economy from the ground up because as we all know, the trickle down theory does not work..
Thats because a idiot like Bush did it. Reagen did it and it worked wondefuly so someone like McCain could probebly do it to. When you give tax cuts to middle and low class you give away more money then you get so that would hurt the economy.
Reagan did not help the economy at all..He made decisions like he had a tree that grew money and put us into a huge debt which wasn’t cleaned up until Clinton left the White House..
And how do you figure that giving tax cuts to the middle and lower class hurts the economy if it really hasn’t been done yet?
What? were do you get your information from? The economy prospered under Reagan. And if america gets money through taxes and when you give tax cuts the the majority of the population America gets alot less money
It doesn’t matter if it flourished under his presidency. He is stating that he was over spending to “fix” all the problems... it worked for the “now”, but it put us into major debt. People really need to start looking past the 4 to 8 years that someone will be president and look further into the future. How will our economy look after 8 years? 16 years? This is how we should be looking at it all, rather than only looking at how this president will affect us in the next 2 years...
Khorib wrote:
It doesn’t matter if it flourished under his presidency. He is stating that he was over spending to “fix” all the problems... it worked for the “now”, but it put us into major debt. People really need to start looking past the 4 to 8 years that someone will be president and look further into the future. How will our economy look after 8 years? 16 years? This is how we should be looking at it all, rather than only looking at how this president will affect us in the next 2 years...
Khorib wrote:
It doesn’t matter if it flourished under his presidency. He is stating that he was over spending to “fix” all the problems... it worked for the “now”, but it put us into major debt. People really need to start looking past the 4 to 8 years that someone will be president and look further into the future. How will our economy look after 8 years? 16 years? This is how we should be looking at it all, rather than only looking at how this president will affect us in the next 2 years...
How Reagan gave tax cuts and how he spent the nations income is 2 completly different things. It does help in the long run because people will have jobs and can pay taxes what Bush tries was incredibly stupid he just gave the companies tax cuts with no direction on how to do it so the companies just kept it. All they need is a nudge in the right direction and they will expand.
