some one new logged off wrote:
What better way to create unity then to compromise?
What better way to create fairness than for the neocons to stop sticking their nose up other people arses.
some one new wrote: I’m not trying to say every one has to follow my opinion about marriage.
(If so this discussion would be a lot different)
I’m not saying you are. But I’m against yours.
some one new wrote: But the government should help both sides of the argument
When one side is just wrong, perhaps it’s not best to be neutral.
some one new wrote: allow same sex couples to be together while staying out of the marriage discussion by supplying civil unions to every one treating it more like a business contract as far as its concerned. Allow individuals to call it what they want.
That’s where I feel pissed off with you. It feels as if you’re trying to devalue non christian marriages, same sex marriages and polygamous marriages by officially renaming them as a business contract. Don’t think that official definitions never mean anything or don’t have an impact on how people think about them, sometimes they don’t, but when it comes to things as frequently discussed as this where what is truth is up to humans, perhaps a better way to reunite what you call “the dead spiritual bond” would simply be to embrace more types of spiritual bond than your strict definition. Seriously, if spiritual love is dead now where people choose their partners for themselves, where women aren’t treated like property in heterosexual marriages and where interracial marriages are allowed then I don’t think it ever existed.
__________________
