“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
to all those that voted for Obama... enjoy your change
this may prove ussfull...
just think....if the civilians can gain a military force...we may have another waring states period like in japan....and then we’ll have diamyos of sorts...maybe i could get in a position of power this way....
J peth wrote:
this may prove ussfull...
just think....if the civilians can gain a military force...we may have another waring states period like in japan....and then we’ll have diamyos of sorts...maybe i could get in a position of power this way....
J peth wrote:
this may prove ussfull...
just think....if the civilians can gain a military force...we may have another waring states period like in japan....and then we’ll have diamyos of sorts...maybe i could get in a position of power this way....
no!anti-obama dont fight!
ll i am saying...this could lead to a major civil war in these united states....as there will be unequal forces in each state there will be a struggle for power....and possibly ending up the same way japan did in 1600...and if that is the case i know just what to do to work my way up in the world...
J peth wrote:
this may prove ussfull...
just think....if the civilians can gain a military force...we may have another waring states period like in japan....and then we’ll have diamyos of sorts...maybe i could get in a position of power this way....
no!anti-obama dont fight!
ll i am saying...this could lead to a major civil war in these united states....as there will be unequal forces in each state there will be a struggle for power....and possibly ending up the same way japan did in 1600...and if that is the case i know just what to do to work my way up in the world...
J peth wrote:
this may prove ussfull...
just think....if the civilians can gain a military force...we may have another waring states period like in japan....and then we’ll have diamyos of sorts...maybe i could get in a position of power this way....
no!anti-obama dont fight!
ll i am saying...this could lead to a major civil war in these united states....as there will be unequal forces in each state there will be a struggle for power....and possibly ending up the same way japan did in 1600...and if that is the case i know just what to do to work my way up in the world...
SAN FRANCISCO FOR THE WIN!!!!!
San Francisco has little strategic value as it is small...poor defensive terrain....and lack of resources...so San Francisco would probably team up with another state/faction....so it is of little relevance...i honestly would believe in either Arkansas due to their crack shot hunters and good defensive terrain....or a northern state due to the harsh winters that could give a major boost to defending....
J peth wrote:
this may prove ussfull...
just think....if the civilians can gain a military force...we may have another waring states period like in japan....and then we’ll have diamyos of sorts...maybe i could get in a position of power this way....
no!anti-obama dont fight!
ll i am saying...this could lead to a major civil war in these united states....as there will be unequal forces in each state there will be a struggle for power....and possibly ending up the same way japan did in 1600...and if that is the case i know just what to do to work my way up in the world...
SAN FRANCISCO FOR THE WIN!!!!!
San Francisco has little strategic value as it is small...poor defensive terrain....and lack of resources...so San Francisco would probably team up with another state/faction....so it is of little relevance...i honestly would believe in either Arkansas due to their crack shot hunters and good defensive terrain....or a northern state due to the harsh winters that could give a major boost to defending....
J peth wrote:
this may prove ussfull...
just think....if the civilians can gain a military force...we may have another waring states period like in japan....and then we’ll have diamyos of sorts...maybe i could get in a position of power this way....
no!anti-obama dont fight!
ll i am saying...this could lead to a major civil war in these united states....as there will be unequal forces in each state there will be a struggle for power....and possibly ending up the same way japan did in 1600...and if that is the case i know just what to do to work my way up in the world...
SAN FRANCISCO FOR THE WIN!!!!!
San Francisco has little strategic value as it is small...poor defensive terrain....and lack of resources...so San Francisco would probably team up with another state/faction....so it is of little relevance...i honestly would believe in either Arkansas due to their crack shot hunters and good defensive terrain....or a northern state due to the harsh winters that could give a major boost to defending....
WEST COAST FOR THE WIN!!!!!!!!!!
the west coast if it formed a coalition may be good...
ramunematt wrote:
Ok but seriously, what is this all about?
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
to all those that voted for Obama... enjoy your change
wow hes not even president yet and the bashing already begins.
ramunematt wrote:
Ok but seriously, what is this all about?
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
to all those that voted for Obama... enjoy your change
wow hes not even president yet and the bashing already begins.
firewolf81 wrote:
Let me get this correct. Obama wants to commission a civil defence force?
That’s what he said. He wants the new Civil force just as big, powerful, and funded as what we have in Iraq. According to what he said, trillions of dollars are about to go into a military on our homeland to protect us from “terrorists”. More people die of peanut allergies a year than terrorists, I have no idea why he would want this (especially in our economic crisis) other than for NWO.
asargentb wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Ok but seriously, what is this all about?
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
to all those that voted for Obama... enjoy your change
wow hes not even president yet and the bashing already begins.
You have to realize now... Obama is just as big a threat to our freedom as Bush. If this happens your going to have the military all over your town making sure no one gets out of line.
Normaly I don’t like Obama but in this case I think he was talking about more militias and relying more on trained armed citizens for national security not another army like the one in Iraq.
ramunematt wrote:
Ok but seriously, what is this all about?
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
to all those that voted for Obama... enjoy your change
ok, you need to watch the whole speech and get over the fact that Obama won.
ramunematt wrote:
Ok but seriously, what is this all about?
“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.”
to all those that voted for Obama... enjoy your change
ok, you need to watch the whole speech and get over the fact that Obama won.
Ignoramus, I don’t give a shit whether he won or not and I watched the whole speech. It’s what he’s planning that I’m trying to get at.
Forums Index >
Politics 
