Do you have an open mind?

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Gplex wrote:

The MASK wrote: why do you always have stick up your ass Gplex just accept that retarded people walk the same planet you do.

Nothing you or sean are have said makes any sense to me. - the only thing I seem to understand from your post, is that for some reason you don’t like me.

As far as Sean goes, it sounds like he’s remarking on your apparent “promoting atheism/demoting theism” idea that’s been going on for a very long time. That being if I were to try and look at it solely from his point of view.
Mask, he’s just trying to make fun of it.
And as far as the topic goes, I’d have to suppose I don’t, believing in things like the soul and God without a reasonable amount of factual proof. (just so I’m not going off-topic)

I promote the truth and human rights not atheism. The only think I have picked up from mask is that the truth doesn’t matter.

The MASK wrote:

Gplex wrote:

The MASK wrote: why do you always have stick up your ass Gplex just accept that retarded people walk the same planet you do.

Nothing you or sean have said makes any sense to me. - the only thing I seem to understand from your post, is that for some reason you don’t like me.

Because you called me an idiot by thinly disguising it by saying " Well personally, I think being opened minded, and relying on physical evidence, and reasoned logic to tell me the truth is far from bullshit, I’m sorry you disagree. "
That hurts what ever is left of my “soul”.

What are you a little girl? How else am I suppose to respond to a clearly stupid remark? If I just called you an idiot, which was my first thought after reading your post, 9 times out of 10, people just assume that I’m being a dick for no reason. This way, you get the message and a reason why I believe you are an idiot.

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

Gplex wrote:

RageOverdose wrote: I kind of wish I live where Gplex did, where everyone seems to be logical

I don’t recall saying everyone here is logical.. a lot of people are not.

*sigh*

You made a generalized statement that did not apply to where I live. I made a sarcastic response to it.

But which is it, are a lot of people not logical or are people in general logical?

EDIT: Heh, wrong account. Oh well.

Life’s greatest pleasures find themselves only in the places most feared. Overcoming fear yields the strongest pleasure a human can receive, one of freedom and strength.

AnarchistChristian wrote:

Gplex wrote:

RageOverdose wrote: I kind of wish I live where Gplex did, where everyone seems to be logical

I don’t recall saying everyone here is logical.. a lot of people are not.

*sigh*
You made a generalized statement that did not apply to where I live. I made a sarcastic response to it.
But which is it, are a lot of people not logical or are people in general logical?
EDIT: Heh, wrong account. Oh well.

Rage = AnarchistC, lol that’s funny. Weren’t you supposed to be the person who crushes everything I say?
In general, most people are logical with their day today life, except when it comes to their religion. But if you focus on that exception, most people are not logical.

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

Gplex wrote:
Rage = AnarchistC, lol that’s funny. Weren’t you supposed to be the person who crushes everything I say?
In general, most people are logical with their day today life, except when it comes to their religion. But if you focus on that exception, most people are not logical.

I dunno, was I? I mean, I could crush your crappy grammar, but that’s just too pretentious, even for me. I don’t know how that matters, though, because I never saw myself as that...

But I agree, most people are not logical in terms of religion, because they accept it as truth. I don’t blame them, most are raised this way with little interference, and that’s difficult to change. I’ve tried to be logical with my religion in the past, but it isn’t easy. And technically, I can’t do it, since after all, I have no method of proving God exists, even to my own empirical senses.

The most logical thing I can think of, however, is for religious people to keep their religion to themselves, no pushing it on others.

Life’s greatest pleasures find themselves only in the places most feared. Overcoming fear yields the strongest pleasure a human can receive, one of freedom and strength.

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Why some things that scientists believe in there theories are just plain stupid. SOME things. I don’t really have a belief, I’m more undecided but I find Diest the most reasonable.

that was an interesting video. I am more openminded since i’ve come on the lounge. Thats why i’ve mostly stopped debating in religion topics cuz i’ve started to accept that you do need science and i want answers and now i’ve got doubts about stuff...

“You’ll never know how strong you really are until being strong is the only choice you have left”

AnarchistChristian wrote:

Gplex wrote:
Rage = AnarchistC, lol that’s funny. Weren’t you supposed to be the person who crushes everything I say?
In general, most people are logical with their day today life, except when it comes to their religion. But if you focus on that exception, most people are not logical.

I dunno, was I? I mean, I could crush your crappy grammar, but that’s just too pretentious, even for me. I don’t know how that matters, though, because I never saw myself as that...
But I agree, most people are not logical in terms of religion, because they accept it as truth. I don’t blame them, most are raised this way with little interference, and that’s difficult to change. I’ve tried to be logical with my religion in the past, but it isn’t easy. And technically, I can’t do it, since after all, I have no method of proving God exists, even to my own empirical senses.
The most logical thing I can think of, however, is for religious people to keep their religion to themselves, no pushing it on others.

If you want to talk about grammar, I suppose I could point out your mistakes. This is a forum, where I only read back once what I have written.
I found it rather easy to accept the physical evidence. I just could not deny physical evidence, as I see so many creationists do.
Belief in a god makes no difference, is the belief in primitive, dogmatic and cruel scriptures which I mostly despises.

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Why some things that scientists believe in there theories are just plain stupid. SOME things. I don’t really have a belief, I’m more undecided but I find Diest the most reasonable.

You preach a lot of Christianity for someone who is undecided. You mean how black holes where predicted well before anyone had ever view the effects one? Why don’t you show me a scientific theory that doesn’t make sense? Remember, just because someone labels their idea as a “theory”, doesn’t mean it actually is one.
I see you don’t want to tell me what you saw beyond science?

Abaddon angel of destruction wrote: that was an interesting video. I am more openminded since i’ve come on the lounge. Thats why i’ve mostly stopped debating in religion topics cuz i’ve started to accept that you do need science and i want answers and now i’ve got doubts about stuff...

Who where you before you sign up for an account?

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Why some things that scientists believe in there theories are just plain stupid. SOME things. I don’t really have a belief, I’m more undecided but I find Diest the most reasonable.

You preach a lot of Christianity for someone who is undecided. You mean how black holes where predicted well before anyone had ever view the effects one? Why don’t you show me a scientific theory that doesn’t make sense? Remember, just because someone labels their idea as a “theory”, doesn’t mean it actually is one.
I see you don’t want to tell me what you saw beyond science?

Apparently you haven’t read the topic “Lawl Jesus”.

A theist wrote: Apparently you haven’t read the topic “Lawl Jesus”.

Apparently.

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Why some things that scientists believe in there theories are just plain stupid. SOME things. I don’t really have a belief, I’m more undecided but I find Diest the most reasonable.

You preach a lot of Christianity for someone who is undecided. You mean how black holes where predicted well before anyone had ever view the effects one? Why don’t you show me a scientific theory that doesn’t make sense? Remember, just because someone labels their idea as a “theory”, doesn’t mean it actually is one.
I see you don’t want to tell me what you saw beyond science?

Abaddon angel of destruction wrote: that was an interesting video. I am more openminded since i’ve come on the lounge. Thats why i’ve mostly stopped debating in religion topics cuz i’ve started to accept that you do need science and i want answers and now i’ve got doubts about stuff...

Who where you before you sign up for an account?

I’m not christian

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Why some things that scientists believe in there theories are just plain stupid. SOME things. I don’t really have a belief, I’m more undecided but I find Diest the most reasonable.

You preach a lot of Christianity for someone who is undecided. You mean how black holes where predicted well before anyone had ever view the effects one? Why don’t you show me a scientific theory that doesn’t make sense? Remember, just because someone labels their idea as a “theory”, doesn’t mean it actually is one.
I see you don’t want to tell me what you saw beyond science?

Abaddon angel of destruction wrote: that was an interesting video. I am more openminded since i’ve come on the lounge. Thats why i’ve mostly stopped debating in religion topics cuz i’ve started to accept that you do need science and i want answers and now i’ve got doubts about stuff...

Who where you before you sign up for an account?

I’m not christian

I assume you don’t want to reply to the rest?

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Gplex wrote:

The MASK wrote: why do you always have stick up your ass Gplex just accept that retarded people walk the same planet you do.

Nothing you or sean are have said makes any sense to me. - the only thing I seem to understand from your post, is that for some reason you don’t like me.

As far as Sean goes, it sounds like he’s remarking on your apparent “promoting atheism/demoting theism” idea that’s been going on for a very long time. That being if I were to try and look at it solely from his point of view.
Mask, he’s just trying to make fun of it.

And as far as the topic goes, I’d have to suppose I don’t, believing in things like the soul and God without a reasonable amount of factual proof. (just so I’m not going off-topic)

No no no I just a bystander

Gplex wrote:

Tyreaus Dreacon wrote:

Gplex wrote:

The MASK wrote: why do you always have stick up your ass Gplex just accept that retarded people walk the same planet you do.

Nothing you or sean are have said makes any sense to me. - the only thing I seem to understand from your post, is that for some reason you don’t like me.

As far as Sean goes, it sounds like he’s remarking on your apparent “promoting atheism/demoting theism” idea that’s been going on for a very long time. That being if I were to try and look at it solely from his point of view.
Mask, he’s just trying to make fun of it.
And as far as the topic goes, I’d have to suppose I don’t, believing in things like the soul and God without a reasonable amount of factual proof. (just so I’m not going off-topic)

I promote the truth and human rights not atheism. The only think I have picked up from mask is that the truth doesn’t matter.

The MASK wrote:

Gplex wrote:

The MASK wrote: why do you always have stick up your ass Gplex just accept that retarded people walk the same planet you do.

Nothing you or sean have said makes any sense to me. - the only thing I seem to understand from your post, is that for some reason you don’t like me.

Because you called me an idiot by thinly disguising it by saying " Well personally, I think being opened minded, and relying on physical evidence, and reasoned logic to tell me the truth is far from bullshit, I’m sorry you disagree. "
That hurts what ever is left of my “soul”.

What are you a little girl? How else am I suppose to respond to a clearly stupid remark? If I just called you an idiot, which was my first thought after reading your post, 9 times out of 10, people just assume that I’m being a dick for no reason. This way, you get the message and a reason why I believe you are an idiot.

But clearly you are committing acts of douche-baggery.

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Why some things that scientists believe in there theories are just plain stupid. SOME things. I don’t really have a belief, I’m more undecided but I find Diest the most reasonable.

You preach a lot of Christianity for someone who is undecided. You mean how black holes where predicted well before anyone had ever view the effects one? Why don’t you show me a scientific theory that doesn’t make sense? Remember, just because someone labels their idea as a “theory”, doesn’t mean it actually is one.
I see you don’t want to tell me what you saw beyond science?

Abaddon angel of destruction wrote: that was an interesting video. I am more openminded since i’ve come on the lounge. Thats why i’ve mostly stopped debating in religion topics cuz i’ve started to accept that you do need science and i want answers and now i’ve got doubts about stuff...

Who where you before you sign up for an account?

I’m not christian

I assume you don’t want to reply to the rest?

I’m not christian, reply to me the same message, but do not label me as such.

The MASK wrote: But clearly you are committing acts of douche-baggery.

Wow it’s like talking to a creationist eg. Ignore any questions and try to insult the other side. Problem is I don’t get insulted.

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Gplex wrote:

King Boo wrote: G-Plex. You should try and question the current “logical reasoning” science is today. Not everything can be observed. To observe the unobservable is through your mind only, maybe you’ll realize some things if you take the time to observe the things beyond science.

Science today is currently the best method to understand reality. If a better method comes along, today’s current methods will be replaced. Everything in science is repeatedly tested. If you find a better way, you would become more famous then Einstein.
If something is beyond science, it is beyond observation or perditions, thus we cannot know anything about this object. Because of this anyone claiming that something is beyond science, cannot simultaneously claim to know something about this unknowable object.
Obviously you are too rooted in your beliefs to change your mind – at least at the moment, so why don’t you tell me what you “realized” or “observed” when you looked “beyond science”

Why some things that scientists believe in there theories are just plain stupid. SOME things. I don’t really have a belief, I’m more undecided but I find Diest the most reasonable.

You preach a lot of Christianity for someone who is undecided. You mean how black holes where predicted well before anyone had ever view the effects one? Why don’t you show me a scientific theory that doesn’t make sense? Remember, just because someone labels their idea as a “theory”, doesn’t mean it actually is one.
I see you don’t want to tell me what you saw beyond science?

Abaddon angel of destruction wrote: that was an interesting video. I am more openminded since i’ve come on the lounge. Thats why i’ve mostly stopped debating in religion topics cuz i’ve started to accept that you do need science and i want answers and now i’ve got doubts about stuff...

Who where you before you sign up for an account?

I’m not christian

I assume you don’t want to reply to the rest?

I’m not christian, reply to me the same message, but do not label me as such.

I will stop calling you a Christian when you stop acting like one. You told me to look “beyond science”, I assume you have already done this? So what did you see when you look “beyond science”?

Cid wrote: You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews

i don’t know about you guyz, but this guy does;

oh hai wrote: i don’t know about you guyz, but this guy does;

Pun I love puns