crys14 wrote:
yup but you know either way thisll go on cuz atheist are so blinded by what THEY want to believe so might as well not argue
You just say that to distract yourself from the fact that you have no proof for the Christian God.
not really i just already realized its pointless to argue with peeps who are limited to just what they can see....
But isn’t it pointless to argue with those that they can only have faith too?
I don’t only have faith. I also believe in science which is my best subject but I am also faithful. But we aren’t the ones who usually start the arguments
__________________
“Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
crys14 wrote:
yup but you know either way thisll go on cuz atheist are so blinded by what THEY want to believe so might as well not argue
You just say that to distract yourself from the fact that you have no proof for the Christian God.
not really i just already realized its pointless to argue with peeps who are limited to just what they can see....
But isn’t it pointless to argue with those that they can only have faith too?
I don’t only have faith. I also believe in science which is my best subject but I am also faithful. But we aren’t the ones who usually start the arguments
When it comes to your God, it is based on faith, no?
crys14 wrote:
yup but you know either way thisll go on cuz atheist are so blinded by what THEY want to believe so might as well not argue
You just say that to distract yourself from the fact that you have no proof for the Christian God.
not really i just already realized its pointless to argue with peeps who are limited to just what they can see....
But isn’t it pointless to argue with those that they can only have faith too?
I don’t only have faith. I also believe in science which is my best subject but I am also faithful. But we aren’t the ones who usually start the arguments
When it comes to your God, it is based on faith, no?
yes although I do wonder sometimes... but yes I’m still faithful
__________________
“Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
crys14 wrote:
yup but you know either way thisll go on cuz atheist are so blinded by what THEY want to believe so might as well not argue
You just say that to distract yourself from the fact that you have no proof for the Christian God.
not really i just already realized its pointless to argue with peeps who are limited to just what they can see....
But isn’t it pointless to argue with those that they can only have faith too?
I don’t only have faith. I also believe in science which is my best subject but I am also faithful. But we aren’t the ones who usually start the arguments
When it comes to your God, it is based on faith, no?
yes although I do wonder sometimes... but yes I’m still faithful
So it is an argument between people who go by what the can observe and people who believe in what they can’t see.
crys14 wrote:
yup but you know either way thisll go on cuz atheist are so blinded by what THEY want to believe so might as well not argue
You just say that to distract yourself from the fact that you have no proof for the Christian God.
not really i just already realized its pointless to argue with peeps who are limited to just what they can see....
But isn’t it pointless to argue with those that they can only have faith too?
I don’t only have faith. I also believe in science which is my best subject but I am also faithful. But we aren’t the ones who usually start the arguments
When it comes to your God, it is based on faith, no?
yes although I do wonder sometimes... but yes I’m still faithful
So it is an argument between people who go by what the can observe and people who believe in what they can’t see.
lol pretty much but shit has happened... which is the reason i havent become atheist bye
__________________
“Sometimes i feel like a butterfly trapped inside a cocoon
wishing i could spread my wings and fly away”
Will4Jesus wrote:
apparently you didnt read the other post gplex, but for the list, it was done last year, the first half is current scientists, the last is older, i thought you would be able to figure that out.
But I cant find anyone I can ring on this list. But that doesnt matter. argument from authority doesnt count as evidence for god... but I would be interested in talking to someone with a phd, who claims evolutino is wrong.
__________________
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
Because people like will4jesus, keeps going on that he has tons of evidence for god, and every time I ask him to provide this evidence, he says something along the line of “this is x topic, we are talking about, not evidence for god”, so I made this thread, and he has yet to post any of the mountains of evidence he claims he has.
__________________
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
Because it’s hindering acceptance of scientific progress in the name of wishful thinking. Because the Bible commands and has caused the murders of so many innocent people. Because it’s so intolerant and disrespectful towards atheists and pagans yet demands tolarance and respect for it’s murderous ways. Because it’s one of the major reasons gays still don’t have equal rights. Because it’s a delusional ancient creation myth that a third of the Earth’s population still believes. Because it’s the biggest in a trinity of three Abrahamic death cults that deep down were created with the intention of world domination.
In short, because it’s an evil, insane, stupid lie that deserves no respect which people have absolutely zero evidence to justify.
i have no solid undeniable transferable evidence that i can show someone. its not like there is a set of experiments that will prove that God exists. he simply doesn’t work like that. and, if thats what gplex wants us to provide, well, i’m not going to play that game.
Gplex doesn’t want proof, he just wants evidence. One piece of evidence for the existence of god.
ev-i-dence
noun
1. that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
sounds like pretty much semantics to me. tell me, then, anyone, how do you define evidence?
I want to see the evidence will4jesus keeps talking about.
proof. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
__________________
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
kev360 wrote:
so, can i ask how you’d define evidence, gplex? just out of curiosity, so we can be clear.
I want to see what physical evidence, or argument that makes you think that it is the truth.
__________________
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
i have no solid undeniable transferable evidence that i can show someone. its not like there is a set of experiments that will prove that God exists. he simply doesn’t work like that. and, if thats what gplex wants us to provide, well, i’m not going to play that game.
Gplex doesn’t want proof, he just wants evidence. One piece of evidence for the existence of god.
ev-i-dence
noun
1. that which tends to prove or disprove something; ground for belief; proof.
sounds like pretty much semantics to me. tell me, then, anyone, how do you define evidence?
I want to see the evidence will4jesus keeps talking about.
proof. The evidence or argument that compels the mind to accept an assertion as true.
disregard my last post asking this question again. wasn’t sure if you’d take the time to look through the thread.
mmk, in that case, i’d go back to my initial thing, and leave it to will to try to do the impossible. haha
Forums Index >
Religion 
