| 22 Jun 2009 12:43 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 39  Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 3,365 OFFLINE | Dream of the Endless wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
KingBoo wrote:
I have the power of choice
I have a magic part of my brain that is not controlled by the laws of nature but somehow isn’t random either.
I don’t think I’m just chemical reactions, I don’t think chemical reaction came up with DBZ, that sounds ridiculous.
1) Out of all the examples of human artistic genius you could have used to back up your statement (however flawed it may be) you pick a second-rate Japanese TV show that everyone will forget in 150 years? What the hell...
2) You don’t really know what a chemical is, do you?
3) What Gplex said.
A ton of stuff gets forgotten in 150 years.
But still, you are right.
Well, I’m not saying the fact that something probably will be forgotten in the future means it automatically isn’t something that took a lot of skill to produce, but... I just hate Dragonball Z, lol
 Last edited 17 Jul 2009 06:46 am by Shaun of the Living | |
|
| 22 Jun 2009 12:55 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 36 Joined: 17 Oct 2008 Posts: 4,293 OFFLINE | Shaun of the Living wrote:
Dream of the Endless wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
KingBoo wrote:
I have the power of choice
I have a magic part of my brain that is not controlled by the laws of nature but somehow isn’t random either.
I don’t think I’m just chemical reactions, I don’t think chemical reaction came up with DBZ, that sounds ridiculous.
1) Out of all the examples of human artistic genius you could have used to back up your statement (however flawed it may be) you pick a second-rate Japanese TV show that everyone will forget in 150 years? What the hell...
2) You don’t really know what a chemical is, do you?
3) What Gplex said.
A ton of stuff gets forgotten in 150 years.
But still, you are right.
Well, I’m not saying the fact that something probably will be forgotten in the future means it automoatically isn’t something that took a lot of skill to produce, but... I just hate Dragonball Z, lol
lawl
 | |
| 22 Jun 2009 02:23 am |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61 Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Shaun of the Living wrote:
King Boo wrote:
I don’t think I’m just chemical reactions
You don’t really know what a chemical is, do you?
KingBoo wrote:
I don’t think chemical reaction came up with DBZ
Out of all the examples of human artistic genius you could have used to back up your statement (however flawed it may be) you pick a second-rate Japanese TV show that everyone will forget in 150 years? What the hell...
KingBoo wrote:
that sounds ridiculous.
But us being able to design low frame rate Japanese animation because an invisible spirit put a supernatural spell on our brain is not ridiculous at all.
DBZ will live forever foo | |
| 22 Jun 2009 02:24 am |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Shaun of the Living wrote:
Dream of the Endless wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
KingBoo wrote:
I have the power of choice
I have a magic part of my brain that is not controlled by the laws of nature but somehow isn’t random either.
I don’t think I’m just chemical reactions, I don’t think chemical reaction came up with DBZ, that sounds ridiculous.
1) Out of all the examples of human artistic genius you could have used to back up your statement (however flawed it may be) you pick a second-rate Japanese TV show that everyone will forget in 150 years? What the hell...
2) You don’t really know what a chemical is, do you?
3) What Gplex said.
A ton of stuff gets forgotten in 150 years.
But still, you are right.
Well, I’m not saying the fact that something probably will be forgotten in the future means it automoatically isn’t something that took a lot of skill to produce, but... I just hate Dragonball Z, lol
You don’t hate it though, you love DBZ. | |
| 25 Jun 2009 03:50 am |
Regular Rep: 7Joined: 07 Jun 2009 Posts: 260 OFFLINE | Why does it seem that all of the arguments for theism either make no sense or are essentially “because I said so” arguments? | |
| 27 Jun 2009 09:45 pm |
Nonsense won't be tolerated Rep: 72 Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 7,292 OFFLINE | the cameraman in Tunisia wrote:
Why does it seem that all of the arguments for theism either make no sense or are essentially “because I said so” arguments?
Because they don’t make any sense, or they are “because I said so” arguments.
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
 | |
| 07 Jul 2009 01:41 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 24 Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 2,001 OFFLINE | Gplex wrote:
the cameraman in Tunisia wrote:
Why does it seem that all of the arguments for theism either make no sense or are essentially “because I said so” arguments?
Because they don’t make any sense, or they are “because I said so” arguments.
Lol thats not true my arguments are rarely like that
A genius isnt someone with a massive amount of intellegence, a genius is someone who shoots at something no one else can see and hits it. | |
| 07 Jul 2009 07:15 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 39Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 3,365 OFFLINE | Astro wrote:
Gplex wrote:
the cameraman in Tunisia wrote:
Why does it seem that all of the arguments for theism either make no sense or are essentially “because I said so” arguments?
Because they don’t make any sense, or they are “because I said so” arguments.
Lol thats not true my arguments are rarely like that
Instead they’re just plain dumb.
Last edited 07 Jul 2009 08:36 pm by Shaun of the Living | |
| 07 Jul 2009 09:00 pm |
Regular Rep: 10 Joined: 15 Feb 2009 Posts: 891 OFFLINE | Atheism AND Theism vs. Goku and Superman!
GO! | |
| 07 Jul 2009 09:38 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 39Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 3,365 OFFLINE | Necro Boo wrote:
Atheism AND Theism vs. Goku and Superman!
GO!
How about no.
| |
| 07 Jul 2009 09:51 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 24Joined: 25 Apr 2008 Posts: 2,001 OFFLINE | Shaun of the Living wrote:
Astro wrote:
Gplex wrote:
the cameraman in Tunisia wrote:
Why does it seem that all of the arguments for theism either make no sense or are essentially “because I said so” arguments?
Because they don’t make any sense, or they are “because I said so” arguments.
Lol thats not true my arguments are rarely like that
Instead they’re just plain dumb.
Well cant stop your opinion
A genius isnt someone with a massive amount of intellegence, a genius is someone who shoots at something no one else can see and hits it. | |
| 08 Jul 2009 11:16 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 39Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 3,365 OFFLINE | King Boo wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
Dream of the Endless wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Shaun of the Living wrote:
KingBoo wrote:
I have the power of choice
I have a magic part of my brain that is not controlled by the laws of nature but somehow isn’t random either.
I don’t think I’m just chemical reactions, I don’t think chemical reaction came up with DBZ, that sounds ridiculous.
1) Out of all the examples of human artistic genius you could have used to back up your statement (however flawed it may be) you pick a second-rate Japanese TV show that everyone will forget in 150 years? What the hell...
2) You don’t really know what a chemical is, do you?
3) What Gplex said.
A ton of stuff gets forgotten in 150 years.
But still, you are right.
Well, I’m not saying the fact that something probably will be forgotten in the future means it automoatically isn’t something that took a lot of skill to produce, but... I just hate Dragonball Z, lol
You don’t hate it though, you love DBZ.
You are not a Jedi.
| |
| 15 Jul 2009 08:53 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 4 Joined: 27 Sep 2006 Posts: 1,185 OFFLINE | I find it interesting that the atheists are usually the first side to start name-calling. “Stupid”, “dumb”, or “retarded” are common to start flying once (usually) fair arguments are made.
Personal observations thus being noted, I shall reserve my pro-theism argument pitch for another time. ---
Legends are usually bad news. There’s not a lot of difference between heroes and madmen... | |
| 15 Jul 2009 09:01 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 39Joined: 26 Dec 2007 Posts: 3,365 OFFLINE | James Falcon wrote:
I find it interesting that the atheists are usually the first side to start name-calling. “Stupid”, “dumb”, or “retarded” are common to start flying once (usually) fair arguments are made.
Like rabbits in the Cambrian, a dead mosquito that couldn’t evolve, a cloud shaped like a W and a flying rock?
| |
| 16 Jul 2009 10:33 am |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 37 Joined: 06 May 2008 Posts: 2,585 OFFLINE | James Falcon wrote:
I find it interesting that the atheists are usually the first side to start name-calling. “Stupid”, “dumb”, or “retarded” are common to start flying once (usually) fair arguments are made.
Personal observations thus being noted, I shall reserve my pro-theism argument pitch for another time.
I find it interesting that theists (more so christians/muslims) are usually the first to throw insults... but even more interesting that they don’t think that telling someone that “the way they live their life isn’t good enough and that they deserve hell” for it isn’t a form of insult.
 Last edited 16 Jul 2009 10:34 am by Khorib | |
| 20 Jul 2009 10:39 pm |
Regular Rep: 12 Joined: 12 Jul 2009 Posts: 888 OFFLINE | James Falcon wrote:
I find it interesting that the atheists are usually the first side to start name-calling. “Stupid”, “dumb”, or “retarded” are common to start flying once (usually) fair arguments are made.
A fair argument doesn’t mean it’s not stupid, dumb or retarded. Last edited 20 Jul 2009 10:39 pm by Omni-Man | |
| 20 Jul 2009 11:53 pm |
Nonsense won't be tolerated Rep: 72Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 7,292 OFFLINE | James Falcon wrote:
I find it interesting that the atheists are usually the first side to start name-calling. “Stupid”, “dumb”, or “retarded” are common to start flying once (usually) fair arguments are made.
Personal observations thus being noted, I shall reserve my pro-theism argument pitch for another time.
If you say something stupid dumb or retarded I’m going to tell you.
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
| |
| 26 Jul 2009 11:58 am |
Thinking bout' life Rep: 61Joined: 22 Nov 2008 Posts: 17,573 OFFLINE | Athiests, just like a Christian confines their faith to a book, you confine your belief to what you can observe on our planet. There is a good chance there are more materials other than atoms and energy in the universe, but you base your inferences and theorys on the basis that nothing else exists. You cannot prove that a God or higher power exists, nor can you prove that what we see on our small ball of dust is all there is. You can deny God, but why formulate a believe on only what we can observe? We can only observe a micro-fraction of our galaxy, and our galaxy is only one among an un-calculable number. | |
| 26 Jul 2009 12:21 pm |
Regular Rep: 3 Joined: 17 Jun 2009 Posts: 158 OFFLINE | King Boo wrote:
Athiests, just like a Christian confines their faith to a book, you confine your belief to what you can observe on our planet. There is a good chance there are more materials other than atoms and energy in the universe, but you base your inferences and theorys on the basis that nothing else exists. You cannot prove that a God or higher power exists, nor can you prove that what we see on our small ball of dust is all there is. You can deny God, but why formulate a believe on only what we can observe? We can only observe a micro-fraction of our galaxy, and our galaxy is only one among an un-calculable number.
Atheists do not confine their beliefs to a book. What is wrong with you? | |
| 26 Jul 2009 12:32 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 13 Joined: 17 Jul 2009 Posts: 1,424 OFFLINE | Mewtwo wrote:
King Boo wrote:
Athiests, just like a Christian confines their faith to a book, you confine your belief to what you can observe on our planet. There is a good chance there are more materials other than atoms and energy in the universe, but you base your inferences and theorys on the basis that nothing else exists. You cannot prove that a God or higher power exists, nor can you prove that what we see on our small ball of dust is all there is. You can deny God, but why formulate a believe on only what we can observe? We can only observe a micro-fraction of our galaxy, and our galaxy is only one among an un-calculable number.
Atheists do not confine their beliefs to a book. What is wrong with you?
They write about there beleifs | |
|
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
Religion 