What do you think Jesus was?

..................

Messiah.

He was a good guy, with good teachings, but nothing more and A delusional man

Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

stfu know one cares what u think.

Thanks to KingBoo my bro for the signature.

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

“Im not a hero,im not a savior.Forget what you know”

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

It is a primary source as it was compiled of notes and letters and speeches and such at the time of his supposed existence.

And of course it’s not the only literature written on him, but all other literature uses the BIBLE as a research point, as it is the only primary.

Do you know how history archival works?

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

It is a primary source as it was compiled of notes and letters and speeches and such at the time of his supposed existence.

And of course it’s not the only literature written on him, but all other literature uses the BIBLE as a research point, as it is the only primary.

Do you know how history archival works?

They have found works mentioning him by the dead sea, as I said before, which were written in the same era as Jesus.

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

It is a primary source as it was compiled of notes and letters and speeches and such at the time of his supposed existence.

And of course it’s not the only literature written on him, but all other literature uses the BIBLE as a research point, as it is the only primary.

Do you know how history archival works?

They have found works mentioning him by the dead sea, as I said before, which were written in the same era as Jesus.

Jesus isn’t even mentioned in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

It is a primary source as it was compiled of notes and letters and speeches and such at the time of his supposed existence.

And of course it’s not the only literature written on him, but all other literature uses the BIBLE as a research point, as it is the only primary.

Do you know how history archival works?

They have found works mentioning him by the dead sea, as I said before, which were written in the same era as Jesus.

Jesus isn’t even mentioned in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Not directly. At least that’s what someone told me.

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

It is a primary source as it was compiled of notes and letters and speeches and such at the time of his supposed existence.

And of course it’s not the only literature written on him, but all other literature uses the BIBLE as a research point, as it is the only primary.

Do you know how history archival works?

They have found works mentioning him by the dead sea, as I said before, which were written in the same era as Jesus.

Jesus isn’t even mentioned in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Not directly. At least that’s what someone told me.

He isn’t mentioned even indirectly, and they were written BEFORE Jesus, they are a part of the Old Testament.

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote:

King Boo wrote:

Haylias wrote: Either never existed, or just someone a lil' fucked in the head who spouted a few good words every now and again inbetween striking down childeren for throwing rocks at him.

He definitely existed, he’s been mentioned in other written pieces other than the bible such as scripts found around the red sea. And for being a Grammar Nazi, you sure suck at spelling.

It’s called I had only just woken up, and the only primary source we have of Jesus existing is the Bible. And we can’t say much for the Bible’s accuracy.

Agent Turtle, I don’t think Boo would have made the thread if he didn’t want to hear what I (or others) think.

That’s no excuse for spelling children wrong lol

Are you just going to LOLSPELLING or are you going to respond to my reply like someone with a relative amount of braincells would?

How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

It is a primary source as it was compiled of notes and letters and speeches and such at the time of his supposed existence.

And of course it’s not the only literature written on him, but all other literature uses the BIBLE as a research point, as it is the only primary.

Do you know how history archival works?

They have found works mentioning him by the dead sea, as I said before, which were written in the same era as Jesus.

Jesus isn’t even mentioned in the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Not directly. At least that’s what someone told me.

He isn’t mentioned even indirectly, and they were written BEFORE Jesus, they are a part of the Old Testament.

Your right then, someone told me he was mentioned though, but religious people tend to lie a lot.

King Boo wrote: How is the Bible the only Primary source of Jesus’s existence? It’s not the only literature he’s been written in, and the Bible really isn’t a primary source either.

I think you’re not considering this deeply enough here. We can’t be totally sure if the people who wrote those pieces were influenced by anyone else or not or if they had some kind of connection with each other. Maybe they believed folk legends or rumours, or were just plain liars.

In the year 4000 could you see how hard it would be for people to decide whether 9/11 was a conspiracy? Especially considering there would be lots of bullshit sources from modern times that would be very hard to investigate.

Still, I don’t think an imaginary person could have generated such hype. But thats just what I think.

I believe he was just a crazy man or an attention whore.