riptorn311 wrote:
Oh and here are a few more flaws just for amusement....Try living up to these standads....
Many flaws in that video. Your supposed to substitute the blood and flesh with wine/grape juice and bread, not like you can find Jesus’s decaying corpse laying nearby. Also, you don’t need to be a disciple to go to heaven, you can’t actually be a disciple anymore since Jesus isn’t here. So a lot of those laws don’t belong there.
PS: I’m not Christian, but I’m just correcting the video.
Correcting what jesus said..how interesting...Anyone else see the inherent flaw in this arguement
I also contend that the writers of the NT took those things literally(with the exception of the flesh eating and blood drinking which was symbolic as the video explains). They believed that Jebus was going to return in their lifetime.
__________________
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen F. Roberts
Das Wolf wrote:
The whole sword thing is really great for showing the point to what I was going to say.
I have a problem with the whole bible. As a English Major, We recently spent a smester on life writing and looking at the bible, it is a colaborative piece of life writing. But just how accurate is it. How subjective were the writers. Its not written by Jesus himself, but merely a set of collaborators who wrote acounts on what they believe and life writing has shown us that memory is faulty and that authors are subjective in their accounts of what happened.
I seek to discredit the whole bible as fiction on the basis that there is no historical fact to support the writings conained within and that history itself is faulty as it is based on the scribings of people based on memorative accounts which can be faulty.
lol wut
I seek to discredit the whole bible as fiction on the basis that there is no historical fact to support the writings conained within and that history itself is faulty as it is based on the scribings of people based on memorative accounts which can be faulty
Ease up on the word “faulty” buddy, it’s not a renewable resource.
The King of MVC wrote:
Unless you take into account the fact that most of what Jesus said in the bible was parable and not to be taken literally. Or the fact that some of it was said pre-death and some after, a point in time which 'changed the rules'. But yeah, sure, all of this totally legit if you ignore that stuff.
Another correction in Jebus' name...Changed the rules???...Jebus said himself that moses laws were binding...Also, think about what you have to “ignore”(as you put it) to believe the bamn bible...Like the fact you just said Jebus was talking AFTER his death...Talk about ignoring stuff...
__________________
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen F. Roberts
Agent Turtle 00T wrote:
i only have 1.
in Genisis it said that there was an angle with a firey sword garding the gardan of eden but the sword wasnt even envented then so is it coincedence that that sword was there and then invented again?
god would order saul’s army to kill everything and destroy everything women, children, animals, men, etc.
__________________
“You’ll never know how strong you really are until being strong is the only choice you have left”
Agent Turtle 00T wrote:
i only have 1.
in Genisis it said that there was an angle with a firey sword garding the gardan of eden but the sword wasnt even envented then so is it coincedence that that sword was there and then invented again?
god would order saul’s army to kill everything and destroy everything women, children, animals, men, etc.
Justifiable genocide I guess....
__________________
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen F. Roberts
Agent Turtle 00T wrote:
i only have 1.
in Genisis it said that there was an angle with a firey sword garding the gardan of eden but the sword wasnt even envented then so is it coincedence that that sword was there and then invented again?
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
WARNING: This is a work of fiction. Do NOT take literally
CONTENT ADVISORY: Contains verses descriptive or advocating suicide, sadomasochism, sexual activity in a violent context, murder, morbid violence, use of drugs or alchohol, homosexuality, voyuerism, revenge, undermining of authority figures, lawlesness, and human rights violations and atrocities.
EXPOSURE WARNING:Exposure to context for extended periods of time during formative years in children may cause delusions, hallucinations, decreased cognitive and objective reasoning abilities, and, in extreme cases, pathological disorders, hatred, bigotry, and violence including, but not limeted to fanaticism, murder, and genocide.
Agent Turtle 00T wrote:
i only have 1.
in Genisis it said that there was an angle with a firey sword garding the gardan of eden but the sword wasnt even envented then so is it coincedence that that sword was there and then invented again?
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen F. Roberts
Agent Turtle 00T wrote:
i only have 1.
in Genisis it said that there was an angle with a firey sword garding the gardan of eden but the sword wasnt even envented then so is it coincedence that that sword was there and then invented again?
I can’t remember all of them off the top off my head, I could just copy and paste but it’s easier to show how many other people also see flaws in the bible when they google the topic.
__________________
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
oh but nothis.us humans,we havent even figured out if ghosts are real or not.they are.we dont even know what its like after death.sure people had near death expiriences so....
dimented dimentio wrote:
oh but nothis.us humans,we havent even figured out if ghosts are real or not.they are.we dont even know what its like after death.sure people had near death expiriences so....
Speak for yourself.
__________________
Cid wrote:
You flame religions and its followers without even considering their side of the story. You’re not much different from Hitler with his extermination of the jews
dimented dimentio wrote:
oh but nothis.us humans,we havent even figured out if ghosts are real or not.they are.we dont even know what its like after death.sure people had near death expiriences so....
There is nothing after death. Near death experiences are tricks of the mind caused by the brain almost shutting down, where the part of the brain that deals with vision creates the illusion of tunnel vision and a bright centre of light. Similar sensations are experienced by pilots in flight simulators who black out from the extreme g-forces.
The idea that there is a secret invisible part of your body that survives your own death forever and still retains memory and it’s sensory perceptions is moronic.
dimented dimentio wrote:
oh but nothis.us humans,we havent even figured out if ghosts are real or not.they are.we dont even know what its like after death.sure people had near death expiriences so....
Then why is ghost hunters on the sci-fi channel and not the history or national geographic channel???
__________________
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen F. Roberts
dimented dimentio wrote:
oh but nothis.us humans,we havent even figured out if ghosts are real or not.they are.we dont even know what its like after death.sure people had near death expiriences so....
Then why is ghost hunters on the sci-fi channel and not the history or national geographic channel???
