Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 2,580
OFFLINE
daledudeUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15
Does anyone know how accurate this film is? It seems to explain itself pretty well, but some of it is a little out there.
Zeitgeist
__________________
I’m determined to live forever, or die trying. - Yossarian

Last edited 16 Sep 2007 07:08 pm by daledude
Ok, how many times are people going to post this?
Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 42,166
OFFLINE
ZucasAgent of Chaos
Rep: 66
I don’t know but needs to be posted numerous times. People need to watch this vid. It’s simply awe inspiring.
__________________


Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 15,447
OFFLINE
ramunemattBanned
Rep: 61
OMFG!! I made a thread about this like, a month ago. Why is it now that people are starting to pay attention to it?
__________________
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”

Cut off your balls so you can stop polluting my genepool, dale.
__________________

Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 2,580
OFFLINE
daledudeUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Cut off your balls so you can stop polluting my genepool, dale.
I’m not posting the movie you fucking moron, I’m asking how much of it is true. Try reading more than the thread title next time.
__________________
I’m determined to live forever, or die trying. - Yossarian

Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 42,166
OFFLINE
ZucasAgent of Chaos
Rep: 66
daledude wrote:
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Cut off your balls so you can stop polluting my genepool, dale.
I’m not posting the movie you fucking moron, I’m asking how much of it is true. Try reading more than the thread title next time.
Yep.
Anyways I’ve checked quite a bit of it and the story of Horus seems to be pretty much true. The astrological part is true. Really the guy presents a lot of facts its just what he concludes off of them which is simply opinion.
But for the religious part he presents a damn good case that pretty much says you can be diest or athiest but any organised religion is simply corrupt and wrong.
__________________


Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 2,580
OFFLINE
daledudeUBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15
The only thing I can think of that debunks any of it is that I’m pretty sure the church moved Christmas to Dec. 25 to compete with pagan religions (which of course celebrated a similar holiday on this day) and that Dec. 25 is not the believed to be the actual birthdate of Jesus.
__________________
I’m determined to live forever, or die trying. - Yossarian

Joined: 10 Aug 2005
Posts: 42,166
OFFLINE
ZucasAgent of Chaos
Rep: 66
daledude wrote:
The only thing I can think of that debunks any of it is that I’m pretty sure the church moved Christmas to Dec. 25 to compete with pagan religions (which of course celebrated a similar holiday on this day) and that Dec. 25 is not the believed to be the actual birthdate of Jesus.
Well that really doesn’t debunk it but more supports what he’s trying to get at that organized religion is corrupt.
But there is no way of telling when Jesus was born let alone if he ever existed. If Jesus is ever mentioned he is named as Christ or Christus/Chrestus. Which means the annoited one which is a title not necessarily a name. Meaning this guy and Jesus may not even be the same thing. There may be proof of a Jesus of Nazareth but apsolutely no proof that he and Christ are the exact same person. Hell I don’t even know if there is proof of Jesus of Nazareth. But you get what I’m sayhing. Its more than just saying there was a Jesus or a Christ. It’s about finding out if they were the exact same person. Cause if they weren’t then when mentioned Christ could be seen as a purely spirtual character as to represent something as they said the sun god.
__________________

