|
Media Forums Debate Forums Misc Forums
Users/Guests (2/228)
» CPO Fraser» IndalecioThe online status of moderators is hidden. You are not currently logged in,
click here to login.
|
Topic Review (Latest First)^^^
She sent this to me via PM
WTF?!?! (martinadokie@rocketmail.com)
Hello i am just browsing now in the internet and found out your profile..at (lounge.moviecodec.com)
and it captured my intrested i desireded to drop few words to you i am miss martina dokie by name i will like us to hold a very good relationship
with honest.and trust.my dear distance colour can not deny but love matters elot.please i will like you to send an email to my mail (martinadokie@rocketmail.com).for you to know whom i am
thank you and god bless you
waiting to hear from you soonest don’t kill yourself trying to read trash The MASK wrote:
kev360 wrote:
The MASK wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
What I read of Twilight was not well written. It was very flat and plain.
No, I didn’t read from the beginning. I flipped to random parts to see if it was the same throughout.
...yeah, cuz THATS the best way to read a book.
and, thats true. people read just it, and no other books. but, thats the result of a stupid generation...
I was referring to her writing ability. She writes very flat, little visual detail. I usually forget I’m reading and start seeing it in my head. This didn’t happen with Twilight. My problem is with her writing. She’s NOT “the best author evar”. They aren’t “the best books evar”. They couldn’t have been more bland.
And I did it that way to make sure it wasn’t just that bit that was like that. I didn’t flip anywhere in the book that wasn’t like that.
lol, of course. maybe well written is a strong term. basically, its accessible. and, that is a good thing. its just very very simple. its like...the pop music of books.
Yeah, that’s a good way to put it.
Best discription ever I hope it’s just like pop music and dies off
it will, and it is. this movie is causing MUCH less buzz then the last one. i’d say, they have one more movie in them, AT MOST.
Where does Stephanie Meyer live?
in the fifth dimension. kev360 wrote:
The MASK wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
What I read of Twilight was not well written. It was very flat and plain.
No, I didn’t read from the beginning. I flipped to random parts to see if it was the same throughout.
...yeah, cuz THATS the best way to read a book.
and, thats true. people read just it, and no other books. but, thats the result of a stupid generation...
I was referring to her writing ability. She writes very flat, little visual detail. I usually forget I’m reading and start seeing it in my head. This didn’t happen with Twilight. My problem is with her writing. She’s NOT “the best author evar”. They aren’t “the best books evar”. They couldn’t have been more bland.
And I did it that way to make sure it wasn’t just that bit that was like that. I didn’t flip anywhere in the book that wasn’t like that.
lol, of course. maybe well written is a strong term. basically, its accessible. and, that is a good thing. its just very very simple. its like...the pop music of books.
Yeah, that’s a good way to put it.
Best discription ever I hope it’s just like pop music and dies off
it will, and it is. this movie is causing MUCH less buzz then the last one. i’d say, they have one more movie in them, AT MOST.
Where does Stephanie Meyer live? The MASK wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
What I read of Twilight was not well written. It was very flat and plain.
No, I didn’t read from the beginning. I flipped to random parts to see if it was the same throughout.
...yeah, cuz THATS the best way to read a book.
and, thats true. people read just it, and no other books. but, thats the result of a stupid generation...
I was referring to her writing ability. She writes very flat, little visual detail. I usually forget I’m reading and start seeing it in my head. This didn’t happen with Twilight. My problem is with her writing. She’s NOT “the best author evar”. They aren’t “the best books evar”. They couldn’t have been more bland.
And I did it that way to make sure it wasn’t just that bit that was like that. I didn’t flip anywhere in the book that wasn’t like that.
lol, of course. maybe well written is a strong term. basically, its accessible. and, that is a good thing. its just very very simple. its like...the pop music of books.
Yeah, that’s a good way to put it.
Best discription ever I hope it’s just like pop music and dies off
it will, and it is. this movie is causing MUCH less buzz then the last one. i’d say, they have one more movie in them, AT MOST. Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
What I read of Twilight was not well written. It was very flat and plain.
No, I didn’t read from the beginning. I flipped to random parts to see if it was the same throughout.
...yeah, cuz THATS the best way to read a book.
and, thats true. people read just it, and no other books. but, thats the result of a stupid generation...
I was referring to her writing ability. She writes very flat, little visual detail. I usually forget I’m reading and start seeing it in my head. This didn’t happen with Twilight. My problem is with her writing. She’s NOT “the best author evar”. They aren’t “the best books evar”. They couldn’t have been more bland.
And I did it that way to make sure it wasn’t just that bit that was like that. I didn’t flip anywhere in the book that wasn’t like that.
lol, of course. maybe well written is a strong term. basically, its accessible. and, that is a good thing. its just very very simple. its like...the pop music of books.
Yeah, that’s a good way to put it.
Best discription ever I hope it’s just like pop music and dies off kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
What I read of Twilight was not well written. It was very flat and plain.
No, I didn’t read from the beginning. I flipped to random parts to see if it was the same throughout.
...yeah, cuz THATS the best way to read a book.
and, thats true. people read just it, and no other books. but, thats the result of a stupid generation...
I was referring to her writing ability. She writes very flat, little visual detail. I usually forget I’m reading and start seeing it in my head. This didn’t happen with Twilight. My problem is with her writing. She’s NOT “the best author evar”. They aren’t “the best books evar”. They couldn’t have been more bland.
And I did it that way to make sure it wasn’t just that bit that was like that. I didn’t flip anywhere in the book that wasn’t like that.
lol, of course. maybe well written is a strong term. basically, its accessible. and, that is a good thing. its just very very simple. its like...the pop music of books.
Yeah, that’s a good way to put it. Maggot Face wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Maggot Face wrote:
What I read of Twilight was not well written. It was very flat and plain.
No, I didn’t read from the beginning. I flipped to random parts to see if it was the same throughout.
...yeah, cuz THATS the best way to read a book.
and, thats true. people read just it, and no other books. but, thats the result of a stupid generation...
I was referring to her writing ability. She writes very flat, little visual detail. I usually forget I’m reading and start seeing it in my head. This didn’t happen with Twilight. My problem is with her writing. She’s NOT “the best author evar”. They aren’t “the best books evar”. They couldn’t have been more bland.
And I did it that way to make sure it wasn’t just that bit that was like that. I didn’t flip anywhere in the book that wasn’t like that.
lol, of course. maybe well written is a strong term. basically, its accessible. and, that is a good thing. its just very very simple. its like...the pop music of books.
Up to ten (10) latest replies / posts from the original topic shown.
|