The Lounge, lounge.moviecodec.com
Your Ad Here
Search
FAQ
Login
Register
Post Reply

Bookmark and Share
Post Reply

The Lounge dropdown Forums Index > Politics dropdown The 9/11 Conspiracy > Post Reply
Media Forums
Debate Forums
Misc Forums
Users/Guests (2/218)
» dalton58
» WallaeusAntonius

The online status of moderators is hidden.

You are not currently logged in, click here to login.
Post Reply
Your name:


Forum:
Politics

Topic:
The 9/11 Conspiracy

Message:


Smileys:


Spam prevention:





Click only once, it may take up to 30 seconds to post.
By submitting this form you agree to our posting rules, privacy policy and our disclaimer.

Topic Review (Latest First)

21 May 2009 06:55 pm

i just accept whats placed on the table, two planes crashed in to the world trade center and caused the two towers to collapse which ultimately led to the deaths of over 3000 people and many more scarred for life. In my opinion any major event will always have its skeptics. But let us all not forget what is predicted does not always occur. Everything does not go according to plan.

Posted by Ill Be Bach
17 May 2009 07:44 pm

The theory has good points, but the whole idea is very stupid. Why would the government blow up their BIGGEST MONEY MAKING BUILDING IN THE NATION to invade Iraq for oil when they can buy it elsewhere? It is stupid. I believe terrorists yes hijacked planes, but also planted bombs in the buildings themselves.

Posted by The Surfer
17 May 2009 07:39 pm

Small necro bump.

17 May 2009 05:52 pm

SHIT_HAPPENS wrote: On this day many people died.. but many holes we’re found in this assumed 'Terrorist Attack',

First off full respect for people who lost their lives on this day, but let’s look at the event that has the most flaws in it, the Pentagon. If a 757 crashed into the pentagon, you wouldv’e seen it.. cameras we’re focused right in on the pentagon when it got hit. But what hit it? A 757? Uhhh.. if it was a 757 you wouldn’t have seen just white smoke and no wings or tail. Also the blades that were said we’re from the jet engine, actually did not match the blades of a jet engine from a 757.. but it did match a, cruise missile. I’ll leave the rest of this event up to you for you to decide if it was a plane or not...

Now for flight 93, there was absolutely NO evidence of a plane crashing or body parts.. all there was, was a hole. Just a hole, also.. the people have been contacted from flight 93, they are all alive. Watch my video I put up in the “Interesting” thread, it will show you quite a lot.

Now for the WTC(World Trade Center), thousands of people died.. it was the most violent event that happened on 9/11. Alright there is two theories presented for the planes themself that crashed into the two buildings. One) They were military planes, 2) People were in the planes and so were pilots, the pilots we’re normal people. And it is said that the military could have been controlling the plane’s path from some unknown military base, and they flew the planes, while controlling the planes, into the two towers. I’ll leave that part up to you, as for the collapse, watch 'Loose Change' on Youtube, it show little tiny bombs exploding on the sides of the buildings, that cause the floors to just break and collapse. Now people said the jet fuel melted the steel and caused it to collapse, that is your decision to believe.. but heres one thing. In the 1950’s or so.. a B-52 crashed into the Empire State Building and left the building burning for hours, but did it collapse? No, so how did the WTC collapse from burning only 1 hour? Thats something to think about..

Here’s some additional facts:
1) A contract was signed to cancel all flights a few days before 9/11.
2) All people’s opinions saying “I didn’t see a plane crash into the pentagon”, was an hour later changed to “I saw a plane”, by the News.

Now who plotted this?
George Bush I believe was kept in a bubble for the past 8 years and was told he was doing such a great job. Now what about Dick Cheney? We didn’t hear that much at all from him.. I believe, from my perspective, Dick Cheney did this with some other people of course. Now why would you kill millions of your own people just so you can get the few thousand other people to think it was a terrorist attack, and a war needed to be fought? Eh... this is a lot of reading, but take your time and please give me feedback, and what you think happened!


finally!!! someone who knows and wont call me stupid. i posted this same thing in another thread and someone said a whole mess of stuff...

Posted by Voyager
17 Apr 2009 12:43 am

There was no conspiracy.

Posted by Shadow Archon
14 Apr 2009 12:59 pm

Plus, they really is nothing for the American government to gain by it if it was a conspiracy. Bush already had support, he wouldn’t need anymore, and I doubt they wanted to start a war in Iraq.

Posted by Chilly man
10 Apr 2009 09:42 pm

Shadow Archon wrote: It doesn’t have to melt to be weakened. Weak steel can not hold up a building with so much weight upon it.

Steel also expands when hot, we have to take this into consideration too.

Back up your own claims. It is not my job to back up your claims in any regard. If you are going to say that a bomber hit the Empire States Building, show proof. And you telling me to look for it using Google. Its your claim, and you should back it up.



Another good and true response. So, OP, the most investigated event to happen in 2 millenia (not including the life of Jesus) was a conspiracy and not one official involved in the investigation said a word? WOW, that was one BIG conspiracy. All the investigators, including the media, are either criminals or complete incompitants (sp? I’m tired again). All of the evidence pointing to a true conspiracy by Al-Quida was rigged? How nefarious. I know Haliburton is humungusly wealthy but c’mon, really?

Posted by Chilly man
10 Apr 2009 09:33 pm

Geass wrote: I’m going to throw this out in case no one knew.The “Terrorist’s” said that their God Allah,told them to do it to get back at the Christians.To them this is a Religious war to us it’s just a plain old war.



Exactly. Well and succinctly said G.

Posted by Shadow Archon
05 Apr 2009 04:27 pm

bump

Posted by Shadow Archon
24 Mar 2009 08:11 pm

It doesn’t have to melt to be weakened. Weak steel can not hold up a building with so much weight upon it.

Steel also expands when hot, we have to take this into consideration too.

Back up your own claims. It is not my job to back up your claims in any regard. If you are going to say that a bomber hit the Empire States Building, show proof. And you telling me to look for it using Google. Its your claim, and you should back it up.

Up to ten (10) latest replies / posts from the original topic shown.

LOUNGE.MovieCodec.com ©lunkwill.net 2000-2009 - Privacy Policy - Disclaimer
MVC Network: MovieCodec Forums/Downloads - The Lounge Forums