Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
no, he wasnt dominant because he’s not versatile.
Dominat Shooter yes, player no.
lol, look at his career averages
24.3 PPG 6.3AST and 10 REB
how’s that not versatile? A player who can pass,score, and rebound, that’s pretty much the definition of versatile.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
How do you figure that? Who would score points besides Mo Williams? Even Williams isn’t a prolific scorer, he’s a good compliment to Lebron,but he’s not a super star player you build you’re team around. The Cavs would be lucky to even make the play-offs without Lebron.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
no, he wasnt dominant because he’s not versatile.
Dominat Shooter yes, player no.
lol, look at his career averages
24.3 PPG 6.3AST and 10 REB
how’s that not versatile? A player who can pass,score, and rebound, that’s pretty much the definition of versatile.
naw, think about his height back then.
very un-common. (hints rebounds)
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
How do you figure that? Who would score points besides Mo Williams? Even Williams isn’t a prolific scorer, he’s a good compliment to Lebron,but he’s not a super star player you build you’re team around. The Cavs would be lucky to even make the play-offs without Lebron.
Cavs Defense is 1000X better than the sixers.
ANYDAY!
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
no, he wasnt dominant because he’s not versatile.
Dominat Shooter yes, player no.
lol, look at his career averages
24.3 PPG 6.3AST and 10 REB
how’s that not versatile? A player who can pass,score, and rebound, that’s pretty much the definition of versatile.
naw, think about his height back then.
very un-common. (hints rebounds)
WTF are you talking about? He’s 6’9 that’s not very tall to have a double digit career average, plus he’s a 3X Second Team All Defensive team selection so you know he can defend. So you’re trying to tell me a prolific scorer,passer,rebounder,defender isn’t versatile? lol
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
How do you figure that? Who would score points besides Mo Williams? Even Williams isn’t a prolific scorer, he’s a good compliment to Lebron,but he’s not a super star player you build you’re team around. The Cavs would be lucky to even make the play-offs without Lebron.
Cavs Defense is 1000X better than the sixers.
ANYDAY!
Because of Lebron.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
no, he wasnt dominant because he’s not versatile.
Dominat Shooter yes, player no.
lol, look at his career averages
24.3 PPG 6.3AST and 10 REB
how’s that not versatile? A player who can pass,score, and rebound, that’s pretty much the definition of versatile.
naw, think about his height back then.
very un-common. (hints rebounds)
WTF are you talking about? He’s 6’9 that’s not very tall to have a double digit career average, plus he’s a 3X Second Team All Defensive team selection so you know he can defend. So you’re trying to tell me a prolific scorer,passer,rebounder,defender isn’t versatile? lol
omg, JOHN LOOK, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE 6’9 AND COULD MAKE IT RAIN IN THE 80’s and Early 90’s!
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
no, he wasnt dominant because he’s not versatile.
Dominat Shooter yes, player no.
lol, look at his career averages
24.3 PPG 6.3AST and 10 REB
how’s that not versatile? A player who can pass,score, and rebound, that’s pretty much the definition of versatile.
naw, think about his height back then.
very un-common. (hints rebounds)
WTF are you talking about? He’s 6’9 that’s not very tall to have a double digit career average, plus he’s a 3X Second Team All Defensive team selection so you know he can defend. So you’re trying to tell me a prolific scorer,passer,rebounder,defender isn’t versatile? lol
omg, JOHN LOOK, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE 6’9 AND COULD MAKE IT RAIN IN THE 80’s and Early 90’s!
lol
One, and his name was Larry Bird what’s your point?
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
How do you figure that? Who would score points besides Mo Williams? Even Williams isn’t a prolific scorer, he’s a good compliment to Lebron,but he’s not a super star player you build you’re team around. The Cavs would be lucky to even make the play-offs without Lebron.
Cavs Defense is 1000X better than the sixers.
ANYDAY!
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
no, he wasnt dominant because he’s not versatile.
Dominat Shooter yes, player no.
lol, look at his career averages
24.3 PPG 6.3AST and 10 REB
how’s that not versatile? A player who can pass,score, and rebound, that’s pretty much the definition of versatile.
naw, think about his height back then.
very un-common. (hints rebounds)
WTF are you talking about? He’s 6’9 that’s not very tall to have a double digit career average, plus he’s a 3X Second Team All Defensive team selection so you know he can defend. So you’re trying to tell me a prolific scorer,passer,rebounder,defender isn’t versatile? lol
omg, JOHN LOOK, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE 6’9 AND COULD MAKE IT RAIN IN THE 80’s and Early 90’s!
lol
One, and his name was Larry Bird what’s your point?
that he could just about get anything we wanted.
Damn I hate the Celtics,lol.
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
How do you figure that? Who would score points besides Mo Williams? Even Williams isn’t a prolific scorer, he’s a good compliment to Lebron,but he’s not a super star player you build you’re team around. The Cavs would be lucky to even make the play-offs without Lebron.
Cavs Defense is 1000X better than the sixers.
ANYDAY!
Because of Lebron.
Im talking without Lebron.
Well without Lebron then no they would have an average defense at best.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
How do you figure that? Who would score points besides Mo Williams? Even Williams isn’t a prolific scorer, he’s a good compliment to Lebron,but he’s not a super star player you build you’re team around. The Cavs would be lucky to even make the play-offs without Lebron.
Cavs Defense is 1000X better than the sixers.
ANYDAY!
Because of Lebron.
Im talking without Lebron.
Well without Lebron then no they would have an average defense at best.
lol have you seen sixers D-fence latley?
shits disgraceful.
Ravishing Moses Rude wrote:
As many as LeBron has won with the Cavs.
Iverson - 11 years with 76ers
James - 6 years with the Cavs
Plus Lebron’s going to win the title this year and is a far more dominant player than Iverson.
thats and asupmtion but your rightabout the dominant player than Iverson.
But put it lie this.........................
Was larry Bird a “Dominant” player?
Or could he just shoot very well........??
Ponder on that
He was a very dominant player him and Magic were the marque players of there era, kind of like how Lebron,Kobe, and Wade are now that’s how Magic and Bird were then, I really don’t know why you keep short changing Bird who is undoubtedly one of the best players ever.
no, he wasnt dominant because he’s not versatile.
Dominat Shooter yes, player no.
lol, look at his career averages
24.3 PPG 6.3AST and 10 REB
how’s that not versatile? A player who can pass,score, and rebound, that’s pretty much the definition of versatile.
naw, think about his height back then.
very un-common. (hints rebounds)
WTF are you talking about? He’s 6’9 that’s not very tall to have a double digit career average, plus he’s a 3X Second Team All Defensive team selection so you know he can defend. So you’re trying to tell me a prolific scorer,passer,rebounder,defender isn’t versatile? lol
omg, JOHN LOOK, HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE 6’9 AND COULD MAKE IT RAIN IN THE 80’s and Early 90’s!
lol
One, and his name was Larry Bird what’s your point?
that he could just about get anything we wanted.
Damn I hate the Celtics,lol.
Then how are you saying he’s not a dominate player? Did he dominate his competition? Yes he did. Was he versatile? Well let’s see, a 6’9 player who could shoot,play in the post,defend,pass,and rebound, yeah I’d call that versatile. I really don’t see what case you’ve made at all to say that he wasn’t a dominant player.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
The MaFuckin Supra wrote:
I’d take 2001 Iverson over present lebron
And that’s why you’re not an NBA General Manager, how well did the 6ers do with Iverson during his tenure there? How many rings did he win again?
They made it to the Finals....................... >.>
So did Lebron, and he did it far sooner than Iverson did, plus they’re pretty much a lock to make it this year and I put my money on them winning it.
because The Cavs have a good set without Lebron.
and you know it.
Not really without Lebron they’re at best as good as the Bucks last year since Mo Williams would be the best player on the Cavs without Lebron, but I’d take the Bucks last year over The Cavs this year without Lebron.
no, without the Lebron they would on the Sixers level.
maybe better,lol
How do you figure that? Who would score points besides Mo Williams? Even Williams isn’t a prolific scorer, he’s a good compliment to Lebron,but he’s not a super star player you build you’re team around. The Cavs would be lucky to even make the play-offs without Lebron.
Cavs Defense is 1000X better than the sixers.
ANYDAY!
Because of Lebron.
Im talking without Lebron.
Well without Lebron then no they would have an average defense at best.
lol have you seen sixers D-fence latley?
shits disgraceful.
I’d take Miller,Iguodala,and Young over Williams,West,and Szczerbiak any day.
__________________
Feet hanging out the window, jock my shoe game/// Cause all my kicks fly, like Liu Kang///
Lil Wayne - First Place Winner
