The Revolution Is A Gimmick With That Stupid Controller

M  v  C   Graphics Designer
Rep: 14



Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 8,080
OFFLINE

dude a game and a dedicated console is completly different.
ur not forced to play just halo 3.
with nintendo ur forced to play with a remote! onestly thts 2 generations old! ps1 had it! the way ps3 has it is a feature. its not dedicating the whole console onto a gimmick, its an actual feature for the ps3. nintendo say ps3s way is a gimmick. wtf! also uv got eye toy on ps3 with new technology which senses in 3d! first ever! ur whole body is better than just ur wrist!

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 4,298
OFFLINE

First off the eye toy sucked in case you did not know, futher more you think every game on the wii makes you use a remote? Dude look at Super Smash Bros Brwal, a fighting game like that could never use the remote so they are letting you play the game with GC controllers rather then Wii remotes. This tells you that not every game for the wii will be controlled by the remote, they have said that more then half of the games released will give you the otpion of playing with the remote or the controller. Also the PS1 NEVER had a motion sensor and Nintendo NEVER said that the PS3’s controller was a gimmick. Here is somthing to think about, if the PS1 had a motion sensor then why would they not put it in the PS2? usully when a new system is being made the company wants to put in all the good stuff from the last console in with the new stuff to make it even better then the last. If the PS1 had a motion sensor then they would not have put it in the PS2’s controller because then they would have thought that the motion sensor was crap and that it needed to be left out. If the motion sensor was not needed in the PS2 then why would they put it in the PS3 if was considered crap for the PS2? There is no answer to this because the PS1 never had a motion sensor.

Last edited 17 Oct 2006 11:09 am by Inferno Hero X

M  v  C   Graphics Designer
Rep: 14



Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 8,080
OFFLINE

dude the ps1 did have motion sensing controllers and nintendo definataly called the ps3s version a gimmick.
ive seen video proof of both.
the ps1 motion wasnt built in the console. it was wired and the motion sensing was in the bit where it conects to the ps1. it had the fat guy playing the ps1 version of warhawk and it luked as if the motion sensing had no problem.(the controller wasn’t made by sony). also microsoft had a motion controller for pc and tht floped too. ive neva played using any of those controllers and will get my first hands on motion sensing with ps3.

wii is already outdated and 88% of there games are for kiddie fidlers. such as there racing game, mario fighting game, zelda.

get some real games like metal gear solid 4, gran turismo, halo

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 37



Joined: 14 Oct 2006
Posts: 1,147
OFFLINE

well said p moore

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 4,298
OFFLINE

GT? Yeah right that game is just like all the other realistic dirving games. I like MGS i played the twin snakes. You think there is a mario fighting game? Dude I believe you are refering to SSBM it has all the nintendo characters. It is true that SSBB will use standard controllers not the remote, and if the wii is outdated as you say then how come so many people like it? When reseves for it began last friday they sold out in minutes that tells you how many people want it. If the remote is a peice of crap then how come it is pulling of motion sensor control so well? It seems sony is doing a crappy job at it and Nintendo makes great use of it. While Mario is for mainly younger kids, you are dead wrong about nintendo having only kid stuff, it also has Metroid Prime, Zelda TP, and SSBM all those are rated Teen so they are by no means kiddie.

Last edited 18 Oct 2006 08:57 am by Inferno Hero X

SAMOŠ
Rep: 34



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,715
OFFLINE

can i have a link to the ps1 motion controll (i beleave you, i just want to see something.)

mgs 4... hmm, seems to me like if there is another mgs game, it may come to the wii. why do i say that? take a good look at ssbb’s play list. ()

how do you define kiddy? you seem to define it as anything from nintendo, making everything from nintendo kiddy. you see, there is a flaw in your logic. games like mario, zelda, and most other nintendo games are extreamely chalenging. they have deep plots (well, maby not mario, but most defently zelda), and most kids would smash there controler into the ground after 5 minuts and go play halo so they can actualy do well in a game.

Last edited 18 Oct 2006 09:59 am by kev360

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 4,298
OFFLINE

not to mention even a little kid could beat halo, a little kid would be whining to their paraents that the games like Metroid or Zelda would be cheating because it takes more then to just attack enimies to beat those games.

Guardian of MvC
Rep: 85



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 44,452
OFFLINE

WTF is with you people calling Nintendo’s games kiddy?

Let’s look at what you call a kiddy game shall we?

What is a kiddy game?

Is it a game that young children can play?

My 8 year cousin plays Metal Gear Solid and Halo, so therefore Halo and MGS are both kiddy games right?

Oh no it’s not that you say? It’s the blood? Okay well then...

I just turned the blood off in Mortal Kombat Armegeddon, it’s now a Kiddy game, right?

Oh what cursing is what makes it an adult game correct?

Let me go turn the volume and Sub titles off on GTA, it’s a kiddy game right?

Your logic of what a kiddy game is is flawed beyong reason, so if the games Nintendo makes are all kiddy then the all games every company makes are kiddy games as well.

Last edited 18 Oct 2006 12:46 pm by Cid

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 4,298
OFFLINE

That would be basiclly what those arrogent fanboys are saying, Blood turned off makes a game kiddy, no sewars make a game kiddy, their logic is so bad that they are just calling their games kiddy too.

Guardian of MvC
Rep: 85



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 44,452
OFFLINE

I’m sorry but if Zelda is Kiddy, this Halo is childish, I know 5 year olds that can play and beat Halo, Zelda is a lot more complicated and it’s more difficult.

Banned
Rep: 51



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,808
OFFLINE

Maybe that’s why some people don’t like Nintendo, because their games are too challenging for them.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 4,298
OFFLINE

Wow then all those fanboys hate it because they suck at the games. It is not our flaut that those games are to advanced for their single cell powered minds.

Banned
Rep: 51



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,808
OFFLINE

Lol, they probably think PS3’s “cell processor” will make them smarter.

Regular
Rep: 0



Joined: 06 Sep 2006
Posts: 411
OFFLINE

Eh, i suppose, but more difficult?

Have you played Halo 2 on legendary?

Regular
Rep: 2



Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 443
OFFLINE

I hate the new controller.

Guardian of MvC
Rep: 85



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 44,452
OFFLINE

Difficulty levels have nothing to do with this, Zelda doesn’t have multiple difficulties to play on, so therefore the defficulty in the game is the default, and it’s tougher than Halo’s default.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 4,298
OFFLINE

Any one can learn to go gun happy in halo, the gameplay is mainly just running from point to point, shooting bad guys, beating them down, running them over, blowing them up, and activating switches. Halo is nothing more then just that. Zelda takes much more then just going crazy by trying to kill one foe, with all the side quests and puzzles in Zelda the game is much more massive and takes longer to fully beat. Zelda makes it so that even the smartest people around will have some trouble on at least one part of the game making them really think where or what they need to do next in the game. In OOT I remember how hard the water temple was it took me hours to try and figure the place out.

Addict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 15



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Posts: 9,242
OFFLINE

Zelda sounds nerdy and boring. Id rather have action.

SAMOŠ
Rep: 34



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,715
OFFLINE

as the saying goes, dont bash it untill you’ve tried it. i have reason to beleave it will be very good (not that you will probably care, but this is alot of why. Read About It and Use It Before You Criticize It — Version 7.6.)

so, why do you hate it? afraid of change? nintendos making it? you think it wont work well? you think it will ruin certain genre? please say why you hate it, and your reasons for hating it.

SAMOŠ
Rep: 34



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,715
OFFLINE

have you ever played a zelda game/ do you care about rankings?