The Lounge, lounge.moviecodec.com
shared movies
Search
FAQ
Login
Register
[ Multipage < First ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... Last > ]

Bookmark and Share
Religious Debates

The Lounge MovieCodec Navigation » Off-Topic Off-Topic
Navigation » Religious Debates Page Navigation Page Navigation
[Quote] #181
07 Mar 2006 01:26 am
strychnine in the guacamole
Rep: 50thumbs-up



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 16,748
OFFLINE
Someone who cares.... wrote: Reality Check:


Weasel, you are not a true weasel!


Ahhh, master of the obvious!
---
[Quote] #182
07 Mar 2006 04:31 am
Es ist hoffnungslos...
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 8,208
OFFLINE
true
---
[Quote] #183
07 Mar 2006 05:02 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 6thumbs-up



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,602
OFFLINE
Reality Check:


God dose not exist!
---
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it."
[Quote] #184
07 Mar 2006 06:51 pm
The Diabolical One...
Rep: 3thumbs-up



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 5,320
OFFLINE
true
---

fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote: Someone with a comment that has thought to it? Blasphemy!
[Quote] #185
08 Mar 2006 12:29 am
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0thumbs-side



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE
False.
---
“Dying men have said, “I am sorry I have been an atheist, an infidel, an agnostic, a skeptic, or a sinner”; but no man ever said with his last breath, “I am sorry I have lived a Christian life." “The wages of sin is death- quit before payday.“
[Quote] #186
08 Mar 2006 04:50 am
Regular
Rep: 0thumbs-side



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 439
OFFLINE
Weasel 16 wrote: “Why do you hate me,? what have i done?"

is my variation of the actual Weasel saying.

“Why do you hate us? what have we ever done to you?"

which is true, why is it that people seem to hate Weasels? we rely don’t do anything wrong, we’ve always been peceful to you. and yet even after centres of being killed for fur, or sport, or money, or just for the fucking fun of it, we are still seen as deviant, evil characters who kill with out mercy, why?


“we are still seen as deviant, evil characters who kill with out mercy”? wtf?
who the fuck see weasels as deviant, evil characters who kill with out mercy?
---
FEEL MY RAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[Quote] #187
08 Mar 2006 04:14 pm
The Diabolical One...
Rep: 3thumbs-up



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 5,320
OFFLINE
Someone who cares.... wrote: False.


no TRUE not false
---

fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote: Someone with a comment that has thought to it? Blasphemy!
[Quote] #188
08 Mar 2006 04:57 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 6thumbs-up



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,602
OFFLINE
who the fuck see weasels as deviant, evil characters who kill with out mercy?

oh lots of people! take the common saying “Your a weasel” its always an insult. and look up Weasel i the dictionary, its all negative shit.

you want to know an animal that should be frond upon, SHEEP! oh yes sheep should be an insult.
---
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it."
[Quote] #189
08 Mar 2006 06:22 pm
Betty TeaBag
Guest
ummm cause weasels have evil eyes, and are usually all sly and creepy. they run around and steal other weasels weiners and leave them hungry. sheeps are much nicer! they eat grass, have awesome wool coats that make ugg boots and umm they say 'BAAA'....weasels are speeeechless cause they are deformed. hah and i have spent tooo much time on this lame subject
[Quote] #190
08 Mar 2006 07:53 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 6thumbs-up



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,602
OFFLINE
"they run around and steal other weasels weiners and leave them hungry”

since when?

and are you trying to say wieners?
---
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it."
[Quote] #191
08 Mar 2006 08:10 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 2thumbs-up

Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 2,116
OFFLINE
So much for religious debate.
---
The farther you question, the more they will hate you.
[Quote] #192
08 Mar 2006 08:13 pm
69
Rep: 15thumbs-up



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 11,127
OFFLINE
shocked Betty Teabag is an enemy of Weasel 16!!!
Call fouth...stuff!
---
69
[Quote] #193
12 Mar 2006 07:28 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 2thumbs-up

Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 2,116
OFFLINE
Wow
---
The farther you question, the more they will hate you.
[Quote] #194
14 Mar 2006 10:29 am
Es ist hoffnungslos...
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 8,208
OFFLINE
true
---
[Quote] #195
14 Mar 2006 12:40 pm
GOOGLE_QUEEN
Guest
very true .
[Quote] #196
14 Mar 2006 02:29 pm
69
Rep: 15thumbs-up



Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 11,127
OFFLINE
true...maybe~~~
---
69
[Quote] #197
01 Apr 2006 08:24 am
The Reverend
Guest
The problem here is that everyone feels that their opinion is the only valid one. We need to see concessions from everyone. Why so much anger and resentment? Is it that hard to accept the validity of someone else’s argument? It is unfair to ask an agnostic or atheist to believe in Creation, just as it isn’t realistic to expect a Christian to adopt evolution as truth ... that said, if one is so supremely confident in their belief, what harm is there in saying, “While I accept that what you propose is POSSIBLE, I disagree." Just admitting the validity of someone else’s belief does not mean you have to abandon your own.

Forums such as this should be used to learn and share, not attack others for being different. Why can’t a Christian learn from the theory of evolution to help understand the glory of Creation? Just because the bible doesn’t use the word “evolution," it doesn’t mean it should be discarded as an attack on your faith. Isn’t the story of Creation a great parable for explaining evolution to a man (Moses) whose mind couldn’t possibly fathom DNA and complex molecular structures? We’re talking what, 5000 years ago? At least? All sentient life is said to have begun in the sea - “And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life ..." Gen. 1: 20, which is supported by evolution is it not? Please, if I am wrong, I apologise and would love to be corrected. And is the story of Adam being created from clay not a fantastic metaphor for man evolving from the earth up, ascending from the ranks of lower creatures?

I believe in a Creator, be it the God of Abraham, Mother Earth and Father Sky, or simply the Unnamed ... I feel that there is more to my life that an accidental collision of molecules in a primordial ooze billions of years ago ... however, I don’t view evolution as an attack on my belief, I prefer to look at it as an insight into how a creator could have made all this possible. Evolution to me seems far more wonderful a plan than “let it be so."

On the opposite side of the spectrum, if I ever want people to take my opinions seriously, I have to do the same for them. What I am about to say may shock all of you, but given the world of infinite possibilities that we live in (be it accidental or part of a master plan), it shouldn’t. Hold on to your hats boys and girls, and get ready for a trip:

I COULD BE WRONG

In tolerance,
Rev. Mathew Storring
Ontario, Canada

p.s. James Leclair (Mathematical Proof of Creation) is a close and personal friend of mine. Google “James R. Leclair” to get all of the evidence that he puts forth. While I still haven’t decided whether or not he’s right (and I probably never will), it is an interesting theory, and worth examining.
[Quote] #198
01 Apr 2006 08:37 am
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 6thumbs-up



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,602
OFFLINE
whats your Email? your the type of person i want to talk to!
---
Dogbert said the deepest thing ever.
“It is all a part of the big illusion we perpetuate upon ourselves and which is in turn perpetuated upon us. When we believe we engage the illusion, when we stop believing we shatter the illusion and ourselves in the process because we are part of it."
[Quote] #199
01 Apr 2006 08:57 am
The Reverend
Guest
While I don’t like to post my email on boards so that anyone can harass me, I will do so in good faith that it will be used to correspond IN A CIVIL MANNER. I don’t care if you wish to email me to disagree or agree, to ask questions or propose answers, just be nice about it. I am willing to accept and discuss all opinions, but I don’t need to deal with anonymous anger. Thank you all in advance.

Rev. Mathew Storring
matstorring@rogers.com
[Quote] #200
01 Apr 2006 06:06 pm
James R. LeClair
Guest
I had no intention to post on, or in relation to, the Devil Hill site ever again. But after my dear friend Rev. Storring mentioned the current happenings, and my original (and first edit) post being referanced and ripped apart,I thought I would post the newest edit with the number relationships that “I did not have at hand”.

As stated in the title for the original post, and ALL others, this is a THEORY. One that contains number variables so fine, and written so clearly, within the very metaphors of religion that any argument is ignorant of the NUMBERS. And ignoring scientific number variables is ignoring the facts.

Was this given to us by God? Or the leaders of the last rise of man? WHoever did, THEy wrote us a Bible, one that would teach us how to survive the world and be true to ourselves and others. But Greed and Lust for control by various sects of humanity splintered the Word and added fear and Hate.

Did God tell us what we needed to know, or did WE tell us what we needed to know? Is the Bible a collection of Stories teaching us to Live True? Or did we tell ourselves the Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth (B.I.B.L.E.)? Ahhhh has anyone ever thought of THAT?

There are many theories in Life and this is but One.

So PLEASE read, debate but never insult. The world is far too spiteful to insult someone for believing in something better. Don’t we hope every day for something better? Atleast I am trying to Unify, not Antagonize

http://66.201.42.16/viewitem.php3?id=1051&catid=527&kbid=ionsikc
“Theoretical, Mathematical Proof of Creation?"

So in the last year I’ve been editing and validating this work. I didn’t discover these numerical relationships, but I am trying to atleast bring awareness of this. So do me a favor and go over these numbers, you are all the most intelligent, and mentally capable, people I can think of

If you can find fallacy or blaring inaccuracy, please point it out.. But please don’t just argue it for the sake of it

James R Leclair


The proof of Creation has been written into the very foundations of every religion, stored within the biblical metaphors.

100 years was used as an important age within the lives of many religious figures in all the oldest religions.

The number 36525 (100 years of earth rotations) was also used to represent the pages of wisdom of various figures such as Buddha, or the number of leagues Mercury ran to measure the world etc etc

The Cube is represented in every major religion. Muslim:black cube of mecca.
Greekblushrahma, also the world was represented as a cube to the greeks.
Christianity: ark of the covenant, and the cross is a cube unravelled.
Judaism: Holy of holies the room god dwells in, the cube on it’s corner is a Dreidel, also a diamond, spin it and it looks like a star of david. etc etc

In Euclid theory (the Theory of observation) a cube has 6 sides 8 corners and 12 lines of dimension creating it, when reduced to a fraction, 0.6812, and multipied by the number of rotations of the earth in 100 years (365.25 days times 100) 36,525 equals 24,881.
24,881 is the approximate circumferance of the earth in miles. it is off by no more than 300-1000 miles

Pluto takes 248.8 years to go around the sun once .. %1 the calculated circumferance of earth


>Distance, orbital and size relationships: (all distances are done
>in Perihelion {true distance} of 10 to the sixth power or 10-6, not
>AU)
>
>Sun to Mercury to Earth
>Distance Mercury: 36(10-6) Earth: 93 (10-6) 36(10-6) divide
>93(10-6) = 0.38(10-6)
>Circumferance Merc: 9525 Earth: 24881 divided = 0.38
>
>Sun to Earth to Saturn
>Distance Earth: 93(10-6) Saturn: 890.8(10-6) divided = 0.10(10-6)
>Circ: Earth: 24881 Saturn: 235 296 divided = 0.10
>
>
>Orbital period Mars: 687 Earth: 365.25 divided = 0.53
>Circ: Mars: 13264 Earth: 24881 divided= 0.53
>
>Orbital period Earth: 365.25 Jupiter: 4331 divided= 0.08
>Circ: Earth: 24881 Jupiter: 279 118 divided= 0.08
>
>How can every planet be related to the earth in such an obvious and
>complex way?
>
>Every number I have quoted here has been reduced to the second
>decimal point, and yet is STILL accurate from %99.5 to %99.9 of
>NASA’s recorded data..
>
>circumferances and distances are in miles and the size of the earth
>in all this is based off the cube times rotation of earth equals
>size.. that number is used in the location, rotation or size of
>every object in our solar system.


the cube times the earths rotation = earth

Einstein searched his entire life for mathematical “proof” of creation. The G.U.T. Grand Unification Theory, scientific proof of God

how can the third planet in a solar system dictate the variables of every other planet in it’s system? how, unless the location of everything was predetermined according to numbers unique to the end result of the earth’s size and location?

Read this, study it, understand it or refute it.. But tell people about it and post it everywhere

James R Leclair
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page
Moderated by: Admins, Superusers

Quick Reply

Options
More Options
New Topic

Your name/nick:


Spam prevention! Repeat below:


Your Message




LOUNGE.MovieCodec.com ©Lundgren IT 2000-8. Privacy Policy - Disclaimer
MVC Network: MovieCodec Forums/Downloads - The Lounge Forums