Evolution

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

There is evidence that the Big Bang is false. Click here to see some.


Here’s how I look at it: God said and BANG! it was.

Regular
Rep: 0



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 439
OFFLINE

*sigh*. pple can never be 100% sure how the universe came about.

face it humans(and a weasle) have all the questions and God has all the answers.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

Yes, God has the answers. He tells some of them to us through the Bible.

The Pendragon
Rep: 34



Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 48,244
OFFLINE

add Nietzscheans too...

The Diabolical One...
Rep: 3



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 5,320
OFFLINE

Which God did not write. There is also no reliable proof in the bible as to why anyone should believe it.

Regular
Rep: 0



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 439
OFFLINE

and nietzscheans(whas nietzscheans???)

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 2

Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 2,116
OFFLINE

That’s true enough. Not only that but obviously people existed before the bible. Why would it be written much much later than from when the first humans existed?

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

The Bible is reliable. Didn’t you go to my link where it proves the Bible is real by prophecies and stuff? I’ll post it again for reference. Click here to see why the Bible is true.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 2

Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 2,116
OFFLINE

Okay, who was that written by? And not only that, but these things that the bible foresees like war and what not, have been happening for thousands of years. And they have been much worse than this. Anyhow, I’m sorry but I have to go. Please excuse me. Goodbye

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

The Bible was written by Holy men. Like Moses, David, prophets, the four disciples of Christ, Paul, and others. They wrote what God wanted them to, like when John had a vision in Heaven, God told Him when to write and when to not write about the things he saw.

And what about that prophecy of Gaza being forsaken in Zephaniah 2:4? We saw it just happen months ago. It’s not like about wars and stuff, it’s a specific prophecy about Israel, and it was just fullfilled in our time.

And what about the Messianic prophecies in the Bible that were fullfilled later?

Really, you should read that article in the link I posted previously when you have the time, it’s a really good article and explains everything in detail.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

The Diabolical One...
Rep: 3



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 5,320
OFFLINE

Yes well perhaps you could go here and see how many of your claims are not always right or how they don’t make sense.

www.godlessgeeks.com/WhyAtheism.htm

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

Tell me. Did you even read that article? ...Like I thought.


I’ll tell you what doesn’t make sense. You claim that in the beggining there was a huge explosion that made everything - big bang. Tell me. Since when did explosions start making stuff? From what I know, explosions never did create anything new other that a big hole or broken things.

Oh, and why do you still have no missing links? If evolution were true, there would piles of fossils of transitional fossils. Maybe it’s because Evolution is false?

And why do you use radiometric dating when it has been proven wrong? They used radiometric dating to date the age of some rocks from the explosion of Mt. St. Helens. The results came out to be hundreds of years old! And we all know when Mt. St. Helens erupted!

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

Ok, I found something in that article that is wrong, the one you posted. The person writing it says we have vestigial organs such as the appendix and the tailbone. Wrong. The appendix has an immunological function as part of the lymphatic system. Its lymphoid follicles produce antibodies. Just because you could live without it, doesn’t mean it is vestigial, and doesn’t prove evolutionary descent. It still does things in our body. Even though you could live without it, that doesn’t mean it is vestigial. You could live without both your arms and legs and eyes, but that doesn’t make them vestigal, now does it? And the tailbone is also non vestigal. The tailbone has 9 muscles attached to it that aid in excretion. Without that, you wouldn’t be able to use the restroom! I’ll bet you none of you guys would like to have your tailbone removed, or am I wrong? Any volunteers? Have your tailbone removed and come back to tell me if everything has gone good and if you lived through your first trip to the restroom. It’s not funny. The tailbone is not vestigal, and therefore does not prove evolutionary descent.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

Oh, here is another fallacy in that article you just posted the link to. The writer claims that rocks, trees, people, and the universe have no intrinsic purpose. Wrong. We humans have a purpose, a higher purpose, to get to Heaven to be with God. Trees are for us, we use them to build shelter for ourselves. Rocks are used in foundations and roads for us people. The universe contains the sun and moon that are there to shine light on this earth on which we live, for our visibility. So, all these things do have a purpose.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

Ooops, I found another. The writer in that article that you posted the link to says that simple experiments have shown that amino acids, the molecular units that make up proteins, can be made in lab conditions simulating Earth’s early atmosphere. Now, for these amino acids to be made, the scientists had to zap the compound to do it, excuse me, when does the zapping occur in real life? And those amino acids that were made couldn’t survive outside the compound they were in. And certain closed conditions had to be observed. None of this occurs in real life. Plus, for amino acids to work and do something, they have to be in a certain order in a chain, in those experiments, they only created a few amino acids and they were not in any order or chain. So they would have no function. So, no, they did not create the basic unit of life which could then make life, sorry.

Regular
Rep: 0



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 439
OFFLINE

good point, i actually read all that.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

What is the good point, what I wrote or what that article said?

Regular
Rep: 0



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 108
OFFLINE

actually it’s spelled: corse jk
anyways, i agree with blackhydra and sammyboy

Regular
Rep: 0



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 108
OFFLINE

if we (atleast most of us here) dont believe in a supreme being, including not believing in a heaven/hell or god/devil, then how would we go to hell if we dont believe in it?