P. Moore wrote:
an old mum whos short on money wuld luk at the too carefully and say
gosh 360 and ps3 both hav a next gen player(clules tht only ps3 plays games on next gen drives)
she wuld list other things like wireless etc.
she wouldnt care about online cus she dont want to buy crap online.
so overal 360 apears to have the same as ps3 for cheaper so she buys it.
then when she plays call of duty 2 without online she cant get a patch for it and not play the game.
those who rnt short on money wuldnt mind if it costs a bit more for a few or tons more features they will still buy it cus its slight/extremly better and get a ps3
only dum poor people buy my 360 and smart people buy a ps3
I have something to say to you. Why don’t you stop acting as P. Moore? We all know you are ps3 fan 4, and you’re not even funny like the K. Katuragi guy. The real Peter Moore doesn’t say stuff like this, when was the last time you heard him praise Sony? Never! Just because a console has Blu ray, 1080p or a bigger hard drive doesn’t make it better. It is more of a convenience, but as Sony has shown with Betamax, MiniDisc, and UMD they can’t get a format to take over the industry. And there isn’t too much of a difference between 720p and 1080p (I have seen both) unless you like sitting really close to the screen/ wrecking your eyes. And also, 20 GB is plenty of space for storing stuff. People will definitely buy a console more for games they like than hi-def movies or slightly better resolution.
yeah, you’re a noob. 720p is HD, and so is 1080p. but... on a 52” DLP HDTV with 1000:1 conttrast ratio and a 4ms response time, you could totally see a big difference in resolution. and 20gb is child’s play. that’s maybe 5 compressed movies at most with a lack in sound quality. that’s less than some iPods! I’m pretty sure people who’ve bought $2500 HDTVs would definitley get a PS3. besides, wut’s $600 to someone who works for a living. I could see how it would affect kids like you who still depend on their mommy, but that’s your parents fault for being poor.
Woah, calm down Truegamer. Not all of us spend every minute in front of a TV or computer so we wouldn’t know these things. But you shouldn’t make fun of people who are poor, that’s not cool.
He also has no idea who I am. For all he knows I could be some kid from a multi-million dollar family (which I’m not of course). Maybe he’s jealous that a 16 year old is just as knowledgeable as him.
ramunematt wrote:
No, I think it just makes him feel superior when he argues with people 10 years younger than him.
yeah, i do apologize for sayin' that stuff... it just pisses me off when kids complain about prices when they know they’re gonna ask their parents for it anyways. and why would i feel superior arguing with u guys if i don’t even know u? that doesn’t make sense. but i would say, at least listen to wut someone has experienced themselves.
I’ve been playing nintendo way before u were born! heck, I’m part of a nintendo generation. Nintendo’s consumer age averages to about 15-16 years old. so naturally, you guys are more attracted to nintendo. It’s just recently that they’ve started to target more of the late teens to adult groups.
again, i don’t mean to make fun of poor people. maybe spoiled kids, but u know wut i mean.
I’m really disappointed with the PS3, i’ve been waiting ages for its release and now it looks like it was all hype, problems with its cell hardware, games on show where pre rendered. its even been reported that they had trouble fitting the hardware into the case, no over heating issues going to arise there then, Sony have proved without a doult that they are the worlds biggest liers in the games industry, and thats saying a lot.
all i know is that the PS2’s success had to do a lot with it’s CEO. I mean, why would SONY have to lie about something if there already in first place, right? seems to me, its current CEO (first non-japanese CEO of SONY), has a lot to do with PS3’s current position. I mean, before this guy, the PS2 held first place it’s whole generation. it’s still in first place to date. the PLAYSTATION team still has the same people looking after it, except this time, a new CEO...
Truegamer,
You made fun of poor people. Obviously you’re not very mature yourself. Pissed or not, you’ve shown you’re not very old. if you had any experience you’d know that if you can afford one system you can afford the other. You think game costs don’t add up? For the record as Sony fankids LOVE to attack “poor” people.
Poor people can’t afford video games AT ALL. That’s what being poor is. People are poor for many reasons and if you’d get your little fanboy head out of your ass you’d realise it. If you were even remotely intelligent or experienced you’d know that. What are you 18? 19?
Also before you go praising the CEO of Sony’s GAMING DIVISION. You might want to do some fucking research first.
here you go, all the information you could ever want on how wonderful Sony is:
Hmmm, I could buy 566 PS3’s for the cost of my home. If my home were locate in California, I could probably buy 1,700 PS3’s or more. For the cost of my SUV I could also buy 76 PS3’s. For the cost of my motocross bike, I could buy 8 PS3’s. For the cost of my Utilities, Gas, Water, Sewage, Internet, Food, etc., I could buy about 4 PS3’s every month. For the cost of my home entertainment center I could buy 9 PS3’s. For the cost of my computer’s Video Card I could buy a PS3. For the combined cost of my Xbox 360 and Wii I could have bought a PS3.
I don’t own a PS3.
Get the point?!
---
Last edited 01 May 2007 10:34 pm by Xtrm Liability
»
Games
» F**K PS3 AND F**K SONY...
