Can God might have created evolution?

The Diabolical One...
Rep: 3



Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 5,320
OFFLINE

GO BLUE...

strychnine in the guacamole
Rep: 50



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 16,748
OFFLINE

Aligators are mean because of their abdullah oblongata.
.... And I like Vicky and she likes me too.
.... And she showed me her boobs and I like them too.

She’s not the devil.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 22



Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 2,663
OFFLINE

medulla oblongata, trust me, my Multiple Sclerosis just attacked it lol

Who Dares Wins
Rep: 25



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 19,034
OFFLINE

YES MAM

strychnine in the guacamole
Rep: 50



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 16,748
OFFLINE

Haha I knew I would get that wrong. Sorry to hear about your Manipulative Solaris.

myst7426

Guest

Abdullah is an Arabic name, lol!

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 6



Joined: 01 Oct 2005
Posts: 3,602
OFFLINE

SWC what would you do if i was God?

MVC's Long Forgotten
Rep: 9



Joined: 23 Dec 2005
Posts: 8,030
OFFLINE

I would die!!!

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 2

Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 2,116
OFFLINE

You would certainly die if I was god.

Morty42

Guest

LOL, I like your hostility toward other peoples' opinions that involve any arguement against creationism. Its not like these researchers are out to disproove your religion, their just presenting their findings and thoughts on what they might be. I also noticed that your icon is of Jesus, leading me to believe that you’re a follower of a branch of Christianity. Isn’t Jesus who taught his followers that all men should be treated equally and you should do unto others as you would want done to yourself? If you expect to freely bash peoples' beliefs of evolution then you shouldn’t be insulted or angry if people crack down on the Bible or creationsim.

Also, you give an example of a monkey not being able to understand English or know how to write as proof that humans can’t have evolved from monkeys. Ten million years is a long time; alot can happen. Just because monkeys can’t speak or write might have something to do with not having a developed forms of language or writing. Or just not being exposed to it for the amount of time humans have been using them; more than 5000 years.

lonnnliness

Guest

R U ?

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 2

Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 2,116
OFFLINE

Yawn.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

"The problem is the usage of Lucy: a particular fossil find and a general term for the entire species.

A knee joint found miles away can be Lucy’s if we are using the term for the entire species. The knee could be a different animal of the same species.

Also, Lucy didn’t walk exactly like humans because she ISNT a human."



Did you know that the inner ear structures and bones and skulls show Lucy, the whole species, to be just like the pygmy chimpanzee? Lucy had no human features, it’s just a monkey. Lucy didn’t walk like a human, because she/it was a chimpanzee, a monkey, not anything like a human! It’s not a hominid! It’s a monkey, what makes you think it’s a hominid?



“SWC what would you do if i was God?"


I know you’re not. So I don’t even worry about imagining what I would do.



“LOL, I like your hostility toward other peoples' opinions that involve any arguement against creationism. Its not like these researchers are out to disproove your religion, their just presenting their findings and thoughts on what they might be. I also noticed that your icon is of Jesus, leading me to believe that you’re a follower of a branch of Christianity. Isn’t Jesus who taught his followers that all men should be treated equally and you should do unto others as you would want done to yourself? If you expect to freely bash peoples' beliefs of evolution then you shouldn’t be insulted or angry if people crack down on the Bible or creationsim."


When people present their findings in “support” of evolution, they are not actual findings that support evolution. I just want to point that out. There is no empirical proof for evolution. Yes, I am a Christian. I don’t hold grudges on people who try to crack down on the Bible or Creation, I just want to debate with them and point out the facts and proofs, and interpretations. I love these people. I pray for them. I want to see them in Heaven with me, so I’m here with them, debating, reasoning, showing, discussing, proving, etc.


“Also, you give an example of a monkey not being able to understand English or know how to write as proof that humans can’t have evolved from monkeys. Ten million years is a long time; alot can happen. Just because monkeys can’t speak or write might have something to do with not having a developed forms of language or writing. Or just not being exposed to it for the amount of time humans have been using them; more than 5000 years."


Hey, millions of years is a big time (I don’t believe in much more than about 6,000 years for the age of the earth). BUT, no amount of time can evolve a monkey into a human, it’s just not possible! Mutations can’t do it, natural selection can’t do it, genetic code won’t permit!

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 1



Joined: 30 Jan 2006
Posts: 1,686
OFFLINE

Parrots are proven to be smarter than monkeys, you know, the little green ones that repeat stuff. Also, octupi and pigs, and dolphins are very smart too. Hmm? Did they evolve into humans? Maybe one variation split off! Yeah, right.

I can’t believe you put up with these people SWC. I commend you.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

"There is no such thing as an unbiased source. However, if the source has evidence and correctly provides its to readers, then the source can be taken more seriously than other. I use talk.origins because they do this."


Here, this is probably the most unbiased Creation/Evolution site I could find with the truth. They at least give evolution a chance. I think you should look at it. You won’t find the biasing that I find in talk origins on this site, give it a try: http://www.clarifyingchristianity.com/creation.shtml


“You must not have read the article of the link you posted. Archaeopteryx is a species. A particular fossil of the species may have been altered by someone. However, there are other fossils of the species that are not forged."


Oh, right. You mean like this one: http://www.dinoland.dk/Dinobilleder/archaeopteryx_fossil_web.gif

Where no feathers overlap each other. What a fake! In real life, if it was real, the feathers would have overlapped each other. Here, they don’t, looks like another fake to me. Along with that other one, the reptile fossil with a chunk of cement or something with a feather imprint attached to the main fossil.


But any way you look at it, it’s not a transition from reptile to bird, even if it were real! Because there is no transitional form of scales evolving into feathers with Archaeopteryx or any other fossils. Plus, there are no fossils leading to or from Archaeopteryx, which makes it just as much of a missing link as the rest of them. It doesn’t show scales evolving into feathers, or mouth evolving into a beak, or any other reptile part into a bird part. So it’s not even a valid transitional fossil.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

"SWC, there is no concspiracy amongs scientists. Scientists actively check and double check their models. The first scientist to find positive evidence that disproved evolution would gain worldwide fame, probably win a Nobel Prize, and his name would go in the history books alongside Newton, Darwin, and Eintstein. There is more incentive to disprove evolution than to find evidence that supports evolution. Creationists on the other hand have a lot to lose: their entire identity.

So why aren’t you ID and creationists posting your irrefutable eivdence in peer-review journals? Why do you just post them on AIG and in church pamphlets? Because you have no evidence (none that hasn’t been refuted anyways. Your AIG boys would be world famous if they disproved evolution. There are over 50 articles published in peer reviewed jounrnals that refutes Irreducible Complexity. Did ID proponents just overlook this and not tell all their followers? To this date, ID has no positive evidence and no peer reviewed article published. The same goes for creationists. The only thing you people have is a mass of ignorant people."



No conspiracy? Please, read The Darwin’s Conspiracy, it’s a BIG conspiracy - evolution. But in a way, yes. There is no conspiracy among TRUE scientists, only among the biased philosophers or biased “scientists." True scientists would be unbiased, and they would interpret their finds objectively, which would show Creation obviously.

I don’t think that they would give a Nobel Prize to a Creationist, or put them next to Einstein. The world is so biased against us, and most everything (school, news, “science” is following evolution, even though the evidence for Creation is overwhelming. It’s because Satan’s guiding people. People follow Satan, and believe in Evolution. Satan will lead you straight into hell by making you believe in evolution (macroevolution, unguided).


I’m imagining a world, in the future, when kids in school, will look back at history, to our times, and laugh at them for believing they came from a monkey. They will learn about the Truth, Creation. They will laugh at past evolutionists for believing in something so ridiculous. That is my dream, for the future. I’m preparing myself to do this world some good. I may go public about all this evolution nonsense, just wait and see. I may be like Kent Hovind, maybe a little different, more writing that speaking. I don’t know if I’ll be able to make my dream come true all the way, but I will at least let the world hear the Truth about evolution. So that they may find the Truth, Creation, and go to Heaven with me. So that they may avoid hell for believing in a big lie - evolution.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

"Parrots are proven to be smarter than monkeys, you know, the little green ones that repeat stuff. Also, octupi and pigs, and dolphins are very smart too. Hmm? Did they evolve into humans? Maybe one variation split off! Yeah, right.

I can’t believe you put up with these people SWC. I commend you."



Thanks, yeah, it’s pretty silly to believe we came from a single cell, by chance! But you know what my real reward would be? Seeing these people in Heaven.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

"Here is a monkey human :

http://www.rotten.com/library/cryptozoology/humanzee/ "



That’s not hominids that were before humans supposedly “evolved completely." I doubt that it’s true either way, but it’s not proof for evolution. If they were alive now, that probably means they could have come from a mother and father that were ape and human, but that’s not real hominid finds, where a monkey evolved into a human. That’s called man losing his proper mind and defiling himself by doing with a monkey.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

"ok someone who cares if you don’t believe in evolutio where did new species come from thay didn’t walk out of water just like that”


God created all the animals and plants and man and woman. God made the original kinds of animals, then, they reproduced various varieties “within their kind” to give us what we have today. But the main idea is that they reproduce their own kind, not evolve one species into another one.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 0



Joined: 03 Feb 2006
Posts: 1,149
OFFLINE

"and we will never convert”


Don’t be so sure. I’m praying for you. God can do anything.