SA-X wrote:
Neptune? Neptune fits all the criteria for being a planet in our solar system.
It has a regular orbit.
It’s a gas giant.
Doesn’t have any nearby relatives, unlike Pluto which has the Kuiper belt that’s full of chucks of rock like Pluto...
Neptune: Well despite it being the smallest and farthest of the Gas Giants, it’s winds are faster than any other planet in the Solar System at over 2000 kmh. Neptune’s magnetic field is, like Uranus', oddly oriented and probably generated by motions of conductive material (probably water) in its middle layers.
The true shape of Neptune is unknown since it’s gas clouds have Created a sphere around whatever lies beneath. But it isn’t formed like any of the other Gas planets, possible because it’s distance.
Pluto’s orbit is eccentric, Which is an earmark for getting knocked out of Geosynchronus orbit. Throughout it’s orbit it gets closer than Neptune at it’s nearest and far past at it’s most distant. There are now 2 more officially recognized Planets or planetoids past Pluto and in/around the Kuiper Belt, which I believe are the remnants of a multi planet collision causing the moons of said planet to continue the route followed when they were just moons.
Any asteroid belt in the solar system is created of the rubble remaining, still following the planetary “track”, of it’s originating planetary formation. If a rock is destroyed in space the material gets pulled into the nearest planetary garvity. If the rocks are from said planet, they continue the gravitational orbit a asteroid belt. occasionally losing chunks, occasionally gaining, but for the most part staying a uniform density.
The newest is temporarily named UB313, because scientists don’t want to name it Xena like the astronomical community has. There is also Quoaor and Sedna. All within the Kuiper and being acknowledged as a similar or larger size than Pluto.
According to the “mathematical Proof of Creation” I have been studying and validating, and the locations predicted by the numerical calculations needed to understand it. There were, at some point, 18 planets in our system, with atleast 4, or 5, being destroyed or absorbed, depending on the planets physical state, be it Gas, or Rock.
There are officailly 10 planets, including UB313 but not Quaoar or the other newbies. With them there are 12, and to be honest I think the end result will be 13 planets in our system.
13, even though dubbed an evil unlucky number by Christianity, is a natural scientific number. Anything, be it a number calculation or shape, is considered “Sacred math” or “sacred geometry” if it appears in nature.
13 is the number of full moons in one year, and has been a prosperous and sacred number since man started counting. Until Christianity needed to make it evil, to convert the heaten Pagans
anyways, this is getting long
First ]
»
Off-Topic
» The pluto nasa mission
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
