| 06 Aug 2006 09:30 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 27  Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 15,069 OFFLINE | Weird____Guy wrote:
You know, you\'re kind of rubbing it in right now. 
lol, sary. just explaing myself.
---
 | |
 |
| 06 Aug 2006 09:32 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | Yeah I know, but anyways, I think that some people don’t like Nintendo because
1. There was and still is a drought of games of ANY kind on the GC, whether they be good or bad.
2. Most of the games are aimed at a younger audience, alienating many potential GC buyers, which in turn spawns assumptions that the same will pass on the Wii.
| |
| 06 Aug 2006 09:38 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 27  Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 15,069 OFFLINE | Weird____Guy wrote:
Yeah I know, but anyways, I think that some people don\'t like Nintendo because
1. There was and still is a drought of games of ANY kind on the GC, whether they be good or bad.
2. Most of the games are aimed at a younger audience, alienating many potential GC buyers, which in turn spawns assumptions that the same will pass on the Wii.
ya, i cant argue with that. while the gc did have mature games, they didn\'t have enough. and, it lacked third party support. all i can say is that the wii is looking to solve both of those problems. but, the big question is, will people be able to see that, or will they not be able to look past the gc.
---
 | |
| 07 Aug 2006 03:51 am |
Regular Rep: 0  Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 598 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
kev360 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
I know Sony is already in trouble, I just hate it when he gloats.
dude, we have to be more mature then them. if you do this, you will be no better then him. we should be able to take him gloating by now, after everything they have done. prove you are better then him.
Your right, wheres my personal hater slave? He always cheers me up.
dont worry ill be ur hater for now ................................. * mumbles under breath fucking faggot * lol good enough for you
--- 75 % nintendo 20 % microsoft 5% sega = 0 percent fanboy to video game companys | |
| 07 Aug 2006 12:56 pm |
Dr. Matt Rep: 48  Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 14,545 OFFLINE | Funny... but wheres my real hater? He is the only one that says stuff so ignorant, so stupid, so biast, so racist, and so immature that he makes PS3 Fan Ultimate look like an unbiased tolerant genius!!! His name is: Ramunematt is a fucking dumbass
Everytime I read his posts I laugh like crazy!!
--- Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement” | |
| 07 Aug 2006 08:58 pm |
Regular Rep: 0  Joined: 24 Sep 2005 Posts: 598 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Funny... but wheres my real hater? He is the only one that says stuff so ignorant, so stupid, so biast, so racist, and so immature that he makes PS3 Fan Ultimate look like an unbiased tolerant genius!!! His name is: Ramunematt is a fucking dumbass
Everytime I read his posts I laugh like crazy!!
o well i tried
--- 75 % nintendo 20 % microsoft 5% sega = 0 percent fanboy to video game companys | |
| 07 Aug 2006 11:12 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | And what does he make ME look like? 
| |
| 07 Aug 2006 11:32 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 27  Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 15,069 OFFLINE | ramunematt wrote:
Funny... but wheres my real hater? He is the only one that says stuff so ignorant, so stupid, so biast, so racist, and so immature that he makes PS3 Fan Ultimate look like an unbiased tolerant genius!!! His name is: Ramunematt is a fucking dumbass
Everytime I read his posts I laugh like crazy!!
oh, oh, he just posted in the “i played the rev...." thread.
---
 | |
| 08 Aug 2006 12:52 pm |
|
| 08 Aug 2006 12:54 pm |
hahahahaha Rep: 27  Joined: 10 Sep 2005 Posts: 15,069 OFFLINE | ok, i could be mistaken...
ok, A hater of yours just posted thier.
---
 | |
| 09 Aug 2006 08:52 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | and how do I stack up compared to his hater?
| |
| 09 Aug 2006 09:13 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 52  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,320 OFFLINE | Haha actually to further incorporate Ramunematt’s 1st post without Nintendo there would be no Playstation as the entire project arose from Nintendo. And if Sony didn’t get into gaming then there was no way in hell MS would be in it. So haha Nintendo created the competition too. Ya hate Nintendo then ya hate MS and Sony. Enjoy.
---

It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 09 Aug 2006 09:15 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | I could say the same thing about the NES. Without the Atari Nintendo never would have thunk that gaming could have actually made a lot of money (remember, Nintendo was originally a playing cards maker)
| |
| 09 Aug 2006 09:19 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 52  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,320 OFFLINE | Weird____Guy wrote:
I could say the same thing about the NES. Without the Atari Nintendo never would have thunk that gaming could have actually made a lot of money (remember, Nintendo was originally a playing cards maker)
Haha actually no we can’t say it goes that way. It’s more without Nintendo joining in for what companies like Atari almost destroyed the industry haha. Nintendo came in and saved the industry from total bankruptcy. That’s a fact.
Atari is the father of gaming and no one denies that but that does not mean they made gaming as to where it is now. It does not go both ways cause it’s different. Atari didn’t get Nintendo into gaming. That was an internal decison by Nintendo. Nintendo started project playstation with Sony which later Nintendo dropped and Sony kept going. It’s entirely different.
Now without Atari hey gaming may not be where it is today. But Nintendo revived gaming with the NES and that can’t be denied.
---

It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 09 Aug 2006 09:23 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | still... Atari was the first to prove that homeconsoles’d actually sell. Otherwise, we might still be stuck playing games in arcades. now taht would SUCK.
| |
| 09 Aug 2006 09:25 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 52  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,320 OFFLINE | Weird____Guy wrote:
still... Atari was the first to prove that homeconsoles’d actually sell. Otherwise, we might still be stuck playing games in arcades. now taht would SUCK.
Haha I’d never leave. But when I think of the father’s of gaming I think of Atari and Nintendo. Atari started it all and Nintendo revived it. I think that’s a fair asessment.
---

It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 09 Aug 2006 09:28 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | yea, I guess..
| |
| 09 Aug 2006 09:30 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | But I’d bet you a lot that the quality of Nintendo’s games would have faltered if it didn’t have any competition (SEGA, where are you?)
| |
| 09 Aug 2006 11:55 pm |
|
| 09 Aug 2006 11:56 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 7  Joined: 07 Sep 2005 Posts: 2,726 OFFLINE | No, they weren’t. Atari and Pac-Man where.
| |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |