Okay, I found this article that said Sony made a very accurate wooden replica of the PS3. They have a gallery of it and in my opinion... it looks nasty. It looks fatter than in the official PS3 pictures I normally see, and it doesn’t look THAT much bigger than the Xbox 360, but it still looks pretty big. Here is a link to the article:
First: who puts their consoles on top of each other; sounds pretty stupid actually. Second: Probably the reason it’s bigger than the 360 is because it can do more. Third: Playstation 3 is meant to be settled vertically or horizontally, on a flat surface. Fourth: it’s stupid to put drinks on a console; that’s what a table is for. Fifth: Design doesn’t matter much when considering the console’s features and capabilities, IMO.
i did it as soon as i had all 3 current gen systems i put my xbox on bottom ps2 on top of my xbox and then my gamecube on top of my ps2 i took a pic lol =-)
--- 75 % nintendo 20 % microsoft 5% sega = 0 percent fanboy to video game companys
yusif2k wrote:
First: who puts their consoles on top of each other; sounds pretty stupid actually. Second: Probably the reason it’s bigger than the 360 is because it can do more. Third: Playstation 3 is meant to be settled vertically or horizontally, on a flat surface. Fourth: it’s stupid to actually put drinks on a console; that’s what a table is for. Fifth: Design doesn’t matter much when considering the console’s features and capabilities, IMO.
Where did you get the idea that if a console is bigger than another console that automatically means it can do more? NES is bigger than Wii yet Wii can do so much more.
yusif2k wrote:
First: who puts their consoles on top of each other; sounds pretty stupid actually. Second: Probably the reason it’s bigger than the 360 is because it can do more. Third: Playstation 3 is meant to be settled vertically or horizontally, on a flat surface. Fourth: it’s stupid to actually put drinks on a console; that’s what a table is for. Fifth: Design doesn’t matter much when considering the console’s features and capabilities, IMO.
Where did you get the idea that if a console is bigger than another console that automatically means it can do more? NES is bigger than Wii yet Wii can do so much more.
NES is irrelevent since it’s been out years ago. Xbox 360 and PS3 are in the same generation and have similar technology. PS3 isn’t big.
What are you talking about? PS3 is huge, it’s the biggest console of this generation. I remember when I got my Xbox 360 and I was suprised at how big it was.
I actually like the glass gloss black and the silver trimming. it looks more sophisticated. like an HDTV. it’s like comparing a mercades benz to a ford mustang.
Hey, remember that analysis I made about why you should get Wii? You know, the one that is 14 pages long on Word that not too many people read because it was so long? Well, since a lot of people don’t like reading too much, I summarized the whole thing into a video using movie maker and you can watch it at this link:
It was my first time using movie maker so don’t be so harsh on the comments if you don’t like it. And my computer wouldn’t let me put sound or actual video on it, so feel free to add that to my video.
ramunematt wrote:
Hey, remember that analysis I made about why you should get Wii? You know, the one that is 14 pages long on Word that not too many people read because it was so long? Well, since a lot of people don’t like reading too much, I summarized the whole thing into a video using movie maker and you can watch it at this link:
It was my first time using movie maker so don’t be so harsh on the comments if you don’t like it. And my computer wouldn’t let me put sound or actual video on it, so feel free to add that to my video.
There are also many reasons why people should get a PS3.
If you were paying attention to my analysis I wasn’t telling you not to get Xbox 360 or PS3, I said if you had the money and will then go get them. I was just saying why you should get Wii.