Well the limited mod. status that you suggested in the thread sounds good as the person wouldn’t be a full-fledged mod. We just need to see what Bjarne thinks. Only one of us needs to be one though.
Brain wrote:
Well the limited mod. status that you suggested in the thread sounds good as the person wouldn’t be a full-fledged mod. We just need to see what Bjarne thinks. Only one of us needs to be one though.
I think 2 because I made the the system but if I am gone someone else needs to be there btu if you think only one person then we must decide who it must be.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Zucas wrote:
wait mod status for what. What we talking about haha.
Limited mod. status that would give one of us power to control Vs. debates as outlined by 21gamer.
Oh I understand now. Really I think that is unecessary. Instead have one mod just eliminate waste in topics such as vs topics. Like ones that have been done before or ones that are repetive. That is a lot easier.
--- It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns.
Zucas wrote:
wait mod status for what. What we talking about haha.
Limited mod. status that would give one of us power to control Vs. debates as outlined by 21gamer.
Oh I understand now. Really I think that is unecessary. Instead have one mod just eliminate waste in topics such as vs topics. Like ones that have been done before or ones that are repetive. That is a lot easier.
That wasn’t workign because there was no system that got rid of bias remarks and such.
Any topic using this system is under teh judges' protection and it is a real debate instead of an all otu argument that proves nothing.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Brain wrote:
Well the limited mod. status that you suggested in the thread sounds good as the person wouldn’t be a full-fledged mod. We just need to see what Bjarne thinks. Only one of us needs to be one though.
I think 2 because I made the the system but if I am gone someone else needs to be there btu if you think only one person then we must decide who it must be.
you should edit the request made in the feedback section thread to giving one preson the limited mod. status and just let Bjarne decide, or ask his opinion on whom should recieve the status. Make sure he understands that none of us are requesting to be full-fledged mods.
21gamer- well I post on a lot of other forums and thye are a lot more strict about these things. They eliminate immediately excessive topics that are similar to another or ones that are made like a previous one. That’s what we need is just some strictness into this. If we need a new mod to do that then talk to Bjarne.
--- It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns.
Zucas wrote:
wait mod status for what. What we talking about haha.
Limited mod. status that would give one of us power to control Vs. debates as outlined by 21gamer.
Oh I understand now. Really I think that is unecessary. Instead have one mod just eliminate waste in topics such as vs topics. Like ones that have been done before or ones that are repetive. That is a lot easier.
The Vs. Topics issue is a growing problem that mods have seemed to ignore. I think this limited status will let one of us guide the debates directly and lessen the burden of the mods themselves.
»
Games
» MC vs. Topics
