| 02 Sep 2006 07:38 pm |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 64  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,558 OFFLINE | you should edit the request made in the feedback section thread to giving one preson the limited mod. status and just let Bjarne decide, or ask his opinion on whom should recieve the status. Make sure he understands that none of us are requesting to be full-fledged mods.
— -
What he said.
--- Sometimes I sit at night and think about the way it is to be. Never quite what you wanted.
I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the Universe | |
 |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:39 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 51  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,244 ONLINE | I say just get another mod and have him handle that. Just need another mod. Whoever wants to do it is fine but like I said we just need some strictness like on other forums. If a repeated topic is posted lock it. If a topic is made that is similar to another lock it. If it’s the same person spamming with those topics ban them.
---

It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:40 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 51  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,244 ONLINE | NEREVAR117 wrote:
you should edit the request made in the feedback section thread to giving one preson the limited mod. status and just let Bjarne decide, or ask his opinion on whom should recieve the status. Make sure he understands that none of us are requesting to be full-fledged mods.
— -
What he said.
Dude you know there’s a quote feature right. Haha you don’t have to rewrite it then put 3 line things haha. Just press the button.
---

It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:41 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 1  Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 1,600 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
I say just get another mod and have him handle that. Just need another mod. Whoever wants to do it is fine but like I said we just need some strictness like on other forums. If a repeated topic is posted lock it. If a topic is made that is similar to another lock it. If it’s the same person spamming with those topics ban them.
what we need is a mod who is solely devoted to the games section. Of course this mod can monitor other sections but places like Off-Topic and Games need some special attention.
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:41 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 51  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,244 ONLINE | Alright guys well I’m out. Got to go do some stuff then I’ll be on Halo 2 after. Later guys hope yall figure this out.
---

It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:41 pm |
bonjour Rep: 3  Joined: 25 Aug 2005 Posts: 8,307 OFFLINE | ok I really don’t see why we need a mod an ofcourse everyone (including me) wants to be a mod) but I don’t think we need one.
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:42 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 1  Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 1,600 OFFLINE | DestinyGuy678 wrote:
ok I really don’t see why we need a mod an ofcourse everyone (including me) wants to be a mod) but I don’t think we need one.
A limited mod status will be necessary in order to guide the topic. All other judges just need to have the seal 21 suggested in their sig.
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:42 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 51  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,244 ONLINE | DestinyGuy678 wrote:
ok I really don’t see why we need a mod an ofcourse everyone (including me) wants to be a mod) but I don’t think we need one.
Oh before I leave I don’t want to be a mod so haha. I’ve never wanted to be one actually. Just never been enticed by it. Of course I’d probably make a good one seeing that I’m on here a lot. But seriously I’m gone now.
---

It’s not about money. It’s about sending a message. Everything burns. | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:43 pm |
bonjour Rep: 3  Joined: 25 Aug 2005 Posts: 8,307 OFFLINE | okey dokes (whats the seal)
and if we can get sa-x then I don’t think we’ll need a mod
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:43 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 33  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | We need one so that we judges have the power to say who won and who lost. Also, so that we can lock the topics and we can tell someone if theyr’e argument has just be rebuttaled or it is not fact and only bias.
---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:44 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 33  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
DestinyGuy678 wrote:
ok I really don’t see why we need a mod an ofcourse everyone (including me) wants to be a mod) but I don’t think we need one.
Oh before I leave I don’t want to be a mod so haha. I’ve never wanted to be one actually. Just never been enticed by it. Of course I’d probably make a good one seeing that I’m on here a lot. But seriously I’m gone now.
Ok, see you Zucas.
---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:45 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 1  Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 1,600 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
We need one so that we judges have the power to say who won and who lost. Also, so that we can lock the topics and we can tell someone if theyr’e argument has just be rebuttaled or it is not fact and only bias.
Also we will be able to control the number of topics. We could assign a judge to a topic and just keep four running at a time. Once a discussion is settled we would open a new one.
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:46 pm |
bonjour Rep: 3  Joined: 25 Aug 2005 Posts: 8,307 OFFLINE | but another problem is stopping other people from making vs topics whenever they want (which is a freedom everyone likes) so I think we should be able to have more than one topic at a time ( one judge watching over each one and after about a week or so vote on it.
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:46 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 33  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | DestinyGuy678 wrote:
okey dokes (whats the seal)
and if we can get sa-x then I don’t think we’ll need a mod
We could find a small pic and have someone put letters or a numbers on it like initials.
---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:48 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 33  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Very, true with multiple judges we can watch more than one topic at one topic. That’s why it’s good there’s more than one of us.
---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:48 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 1  Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 1,600 OFFLINE | DestinyGuy678 wrote:
but another problem is stopping other people from making vs topics whenever they want (which is a freedom everyone likes) so I think we should be able to have more than one topic at a time ( one judge watching over each one and after about a week or so vote on it.
Also we will be able to control the number of topics. We could assign a judge to a topic and just keep four running at a time. Once a discussion is settled we would open a new one.
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:48 pm |
~ Vi Veri ~ Rep: 64  Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 32,558 OFFLINE | How about a code number, or a link?
--- Sometimes I sit at night and think about the way it is to be. Never quite what you wanted.
I by the power of Truth, while living, have conquered the UniverseLast edited 02 Sep 2006 07:49 pm by NEREVAR117 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:49 pm |
bonjour Rep: 3  Joined: 25 Aug 2005 Posts: 8,307 OFFLINE | yes, however another problem would be if they would really elect another mod just ofr the purpose of vs topic, seeing as not one mod has looked into this yet
---
 | |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:49 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 33  Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | DestinyGuy678 wrote:
but another problem is stopping other people from making vs topics whenever they want (which is a freedom everyone likes) so I think we should be able to have more than one topic at a time ( one judge watching over each one and after about a week or so vote on it.
If they create they’re own vs. topics and don’t ask us for “protection” then it’s their fault if they get the spam frmo other people and it gets out of hand, at which point it will most likely be locked by a mod.
---
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 02 Sep 2006 07:50 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 1  Joined: 19 Feb 2006 Posts: 1,600 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
DestinyGuy678 wrote:
but another problem is stopping other people from making vs topics whenever they want (which is a freedom everyone likes) so I think we should be able to have more than one topic at a time ( one judge watching over each one and after about a week or so vote on it.
If they create they’re own vs. topics and don’t ask us for “protection” then it’s their fault if they get the spam frmo other people and it gets out of hand, at which point it will most likely be locked by a mod.
Well if our new policy becomes the standard under our new tighter restrictions than the growth of “unprotected” vs. topics will stagnate.
---
 Last edited 02 Sep 2006 07:51 pm by Brain | |
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |