Mr.Bjarne
I am here to request moderatorship.
I am requesting moderatorship for the purpose of being a “head-judge” of the new vs. debate topics system that I have started with others.
We have noticed that the debates are always getting out of hand and are no longer debates.
That’s why we have started this system, which I have described in the Halo vs. Prime complaint in the feedback section and in the 2 new VS. Debate topics I have created in the games section.
This is in no part a request to become full-time mods or replace any of the existing mods because this is only for the debate system that we “vs. go-ers” have decided to adopt. Without modding power from someone who creatde thesystem and knows how it works we will not be able to make sure the system works properly nor will we be able to judge due to the fact that we have no power and cannot tell someone to follower topic’s rules.
I am asking only to be a limited-time mod or mod with less power.
I in no way will abuse my powers nor shall I break or bend any current Codec rules.
Please look over the system that I have described if you want to know more about it and feel free to ask me if you have any questions.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
-21
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
The System
There is a main stickied topic where people can request to have their topics “protected” by the judges.
The protection from the judges or guides insures that the topics will be free of bias comments, will be judged to see who wins the debate, and will infact work like a debate.
The people commenting in the topic regularly and in a sense “live” there or own it can ask for the protection but do not have to.
If they do not ask for protection they it is there problem if it is going out of hand and is closed by a mod.
With this people will want no bias comments and trash in the debates and will ask for the protection. People will be ridding the debates of problems on their own free will.
There is also a topic that is stickied and locked, which are the rules for protected vs. topics and ushc.
They will be judges so that several topics can be protected at once. These judges will all have a seal because they are not mods. With these seal everyone know that they are judges and can take care of the protected topics.
There names will be listed in the rules so that everyone knows. The “seal” can either be a link or a small seal in the corner of they’re avatar.
It is against the rules to steal a seal and impersonate a judge.
Once a debate topic is over it can be locked so that it doesn’t turn into spam.
The Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft clubs will have bias comments because they are not debates and are places where bias people can discuss bias things.
If people go in it and are offended by someone sayign another system “sucks” it is there fault that they went in the obviously bias club. A Nintendo fan must expect bias comments in a bias Sony club they are going into. If they do not agree they must leave or they can always debate in
a vs. topic where bias remarks are not valid.
People may not go into other clubs to cause trouble with their anti-consoel remarks.
An example is that A sony fan cannot go into a Microsoft club and say something bias such as the 360 “sucks."
Profanity or at least excessive profanity is not allowed in any topic. So a Sony fan cannot say the 360 “sucks..." or anythign similar but they are allowed to say something like “I love smashing 360’s."
The people who have volunteered and we have duscussed for this system are. We think they will make good the system and are the best possible choses as they can act without bias.
21st gamer
Brain
NEREVAR117
DestinyGuy678
Weeman
Topic Protection Topic
The system is already beign implemented and almost everyone seems to be happy abotu it.
»
Feedback
» Moderatorship, Judges, and Debate
