| 12 Oct 2006 08:26 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54  Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,967 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
You people are fools. That article there comes from a very immature and narrow minded person. I mean he openly comes out an criticizes the person yet not what he says. That already shows how much of an idiot that article writer was.
How is he narrowminded?
Disagreement does not equal narrowminded.
Of course it doesn’t why would you ever judge like that. Someone is looking for trouble. I for one have watched the entire Loose Change videos and I don’t believe they are the actual truth but they do pose a question of how truthful the government was with us about the events that occurred at 9/11.
And the writer of that article is quite narrowminded. He doesn’t look at all the other sides yet simply bashes the writer and what he says. That shows narrowmindness and immaturity and desperation to prove a point that he has no sources to back up with. If you say it’s my disagreement that makes me think he’s narrowminded then you are judging way to early.
 
  | |
|
| 12 Oct 2006 08:27 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10 Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 4,411 OFFLINE | OMFG Are you Kidding me?! How could you possibly think it was a coverup?! They have the planes on video hitting the towers! But yet you still have people saying there were explosions at the bottom of the towers? WHAT?!
Building seven probably went down because there was fire inside the building weakening the steel structure holding it up. It didn’t melt the steel, It just weakened it. It probably caught on fire when the other towers got damaged and the fire wasn’t too visible because it was concealed in the building.
The concrete was turned to dust because you get a 100 story tower which has to weigh thousands or even millions of tons falling down on itself nothing is going to survive not even concrete.
The reason the WTC had power outages is probably because, EVERY PLACE HAS POWER OUTAGES NOW AND THEN! Especially in a HUGE city like New York City, And they probably evacuated because they might have thought the power outages were terrorist attacks.
The Towers probably fell even though they were built to withstand multiple airplane hits because of either a design flaw or they hadn’t anticipated a plane of that size would ever hit the towers, Plus They planned on extingushing the flames if they ever did get hit, But Nobody knew how to extinguish the flames in a 100 story building. The Titanic was unsinkable but look what happed there. Is that a cover up too?
And as for the airline fuel burning, The fire from the fuel was concealed inside the building. Thats why the steel was weakened and why the people didn’t get burned from it. ---
Yippie Kai Aye, Motherf*cker!! [size=1]post[/post]: Yea: posting just for the sake of posting is wrong, Now posting to get your post count up is a totally different story. | |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:27 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,967 OFFLINE | Don’t be hating me for looking at all sides and giving the possibility of other things happening. Just because you guys are 100% enlightened about what you’ve heard over the years and shut down anything new doesn’t mean it’s already bullshit. Be a little more open to new ideas. Otherwise you are what you speak against. ---
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:28 pm |
The Diabolical One... Rep: 3 Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 5,320 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
You people are fools. That article there comes from a very immature and narrow minded person. I mean he openly comes out an criticizes the person yet not what he says. That already shows how much of an idiot that article writer was.
and the person who made that video only shows one side of the story... he twisted words to suit his needs and never shows the entire context of the issue cause he knows it would disprove him... he sights uncredible sources and only uses information tht helps him... he gives 1/4 of the truth and that is not good enough when you are dealing with an issue like 9/11...
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Someone with a comment that has thought to it? Blasphemy!
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:29 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,967 OFFLINE | dark99 wrote:
Zucas wrote:
You people are fools. That article there comes from a very immature and narrow minded person. I mean he openly comes out an criticizes the person yet not what he says. That already shows how much of an idiot that article writer was.
and the person who made that video only shows one side of the story... he twisted words to suit his needs and never shows the entire context of the issue cause he knows it would disprove him... he sights uncredible sources and only uses information tht helps him... he gives 1/4 of the truth and that is not good enough when you are dealing with an issue like 9/11...
Yea he did but it’s no different than your everyday media that presented the 9/11 story yet what they said is the truth. Look at things form all sides before posting things such as this.
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:29 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38 Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
You people are fools. That article there comes from a very immature and narrow minded person. I mean he openly comes out an criticizes the person yet not what he says. That already shows how much of an idiot that article writer was.
How is he narrowminded?
Disagreement does not equal narrowminded.
Of course it doesn’t why would you ever judge like that. Someone is looking for trouble. I for one have watched the entire Loose Change videos and I don’t believe they are the actual truth but they do pose a question of how truthful the government was with us about the events that occurred at 9/11.
And the writer of that article is quite narrowminded. He doesn’t look at all the other sides yet simply bashes the writer and what he says. That shows narrowmindness and immaturity and desperation to prove a point that he has no sources to back up with. If you say it’s my disagreement that makes me think he’s narrowminded then you are judging way to early.
I’m merely closing in on you.
Bashing down on what 1 guy says and using rebuttals aren’t narrowminded.
Also, he claims to be a conspiracy nut so that is definitely the other side.
Also, those conspiracy theories about 9/11 have no proof and the fact that they have a habit of getting their info wrong is more than enough to count them as unreliable.
 the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:31 pm |
you are smart Rep: 48 Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 16,610 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
You people are fools. That article there comes from a very immature and narrow minded person. I mean he openly comes out an criticizes the person yet not what he says. That already shows how much of an idiot that article writer was.
How is he narrowminded?
Disagreement does not equal narrowminded.
Of course it doesn’t why would you ever judge like that. Someone is looking for trouble. I for one have watched the entire Loose Change videos and I don’t believe they are the actual truth but they do pose a question of how truthful the government was with us about the events that occurred at 9/11.
And the writer of that article is quite narrowminded. He doesn’t look at all the other sides yet simply bashes the writer and what he says. That shows narrowmindness and immaturity and desperation to prove a point that he has no sources to back up with. If you say it’s my disagreement that makes me think he’s narrowminded then you are judging way to early.
What sources? He brings up a point of hipocracy, that if the government has no problem with killing thousands of its own citizens, and even more in the war ensuing, why would the gov’t not kill the one who “proved” their conspiracy?
And don’t think that just because he doesn’t mention the other side of the argument doesn’t mean he doesn’t look at it. There’s just no point in showing the other side of the argument in something that tries to disprove it. Especially for a humor site.
 | |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:31 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 4,411 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Also, those conspiracy theories about 9/11 have no proof and the fact that they have a habit of getting their info wrong is more than enough to count them as unreliable.
Not to mention the sources of their information.
Yippie Kai Aye, Motherf*cker!! [size=1]post[/post]: Yea: posting just for the sake of posting is wrong, Now posting to get your post count up is a totally different story. | |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:33 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
Don’t be hating me for looking at all sides and giving the possibility of other things happening. Just because you guys are 100% enlightened about what you’ve heard over the years and shut down anything new doesn’t mean it’s already bullshit. Be a little more open to new ideas. Otherwise you are what you speak against.
You obviously do not know the term open-minded.
Don’t use it if you don’t know. This is a debate and
using a term you don’t know severely hurts your argument.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
Last edited 12 Oct 2006 08:33 pm by the21gamer | |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:33 pm |
The Diabolical One... Rep: 3Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 5,320 OFFLINE | no the media didn’t tell all the truth... the structural engineers and other officials trained to determine the causes of collapse told the truth... and I do look at things from many sides and the side that has the majority of the evidence is the side that said it was a terrorist attack so that is who I believe... not some amateur with no background in the issue who posts some video to turn people against the US government... ---
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Someone with a comment that has thought to it? Blasphemy!
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:34 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Brutus Kicks Ass wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Also, those conspiracy theories about 9/11 have no proof and the fact that they have a habit of getting their info wrong is more than enough to count them as unreliable.
Not to mention the sources of their information.
So true.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:34 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 4,411 OFFLINE | People have to stop beliveing everything they see on t.v. Wait a minute... Didn’t stan say that a bunch of pissed off libyans Crashed the planes? There you go all you doubters. There’s your answer. ---
Yippie Kai Aye, Motherf*cker!! [size=1]post[/post]: Yea: posting just for the sake of posting is wrong, Now posting to get your post count up is a totally different story. | |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:34 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,967 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
You people are fools. That article there comes from a very immature and narrow minded person. I mean he openly comes out an criticizes the person yet not what he says. That already shows how much of an idiot that article writer was.
How is he narrowminded?
Disagreement does not equal narrowminded.
Of course it doesn’t why would you ever judge like that. Someone is looking for trouble. I for one have watched the entire Loose Change videos and I don’t believe they are the actual truth but they do pose a question of how truthful the government was with us about the events that occurred at 9/11.
And the writer of that article is quite narrowminded. He doesn’t look at all the other sides yet simply bashes the writer and what he says. That shows narrowmindness and immaturity and desperation to prove a point that he has no sources to back up with. If you say it’s my disagreement that makes me think he’s narrowminded then you are judging way to early.
I’m merely closing in on you.
Bashing down on what 1 guy says and using rebuttals aren’t narrowminded.
Also, he claims to be a conspiracy nut so that is definitely the other side.
Also, those conspiracy theories about 9/11 have no proof and the fact that they have a habit of getting their info wrong is more than enough to count them as unreliable.
Your closing in on me is a sign of desperation. If you know any better you’d think before discussing this topic. I know more than you on this topic as I know the 9-11 story proclaimed by the media and I’ve watched the Loose Change videos. OPENLY I might add. Actually it was gg over the summer who brought the videos up about it and I was angry at first and didn’t want to watch cause I’m very strong about the event. But you watch it, openly I might add for new ideas, and it changes your thoughts about everything. It’s like you’d only known a little of the story and this guy just opens up the other door to show you everything.
The conspiracy is fishy indeed but not more fishy than the entire 9-11 itself. I know this is hard for people to take. It’s like one day someone coming out and proving Jesus Christ isn’t the son of god. I mean it’s hard to think as even ever being true but watching it is something we all need to do. Openly talking on this forum, as all you have done, without ever watching the video, seriously and openly, shows what the American media has turned you into. I have no more to say to people who have a blind opinion on the matter.
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:36 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,967 OFFLINE | the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
Don’t be hating me for looking at all sides and giving the possibility of other things happening. Just because you guys are 100% enlightened about what you’ve heard over the years and shut down anything new doesn’t mean it’s already bullshit. Be a little more open to new ideas. Otherwise you are what you speak against.
You obviously do not know the term open-minded.
Don’t use it if you don’t know. This is a debate and
using a term you don’t know severely hurts your argument.
Pathetic.
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:37 pm |
The Diabolical One... Rep: 3Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 5,320 OFFLINE | just like the conspiracy... ---
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Someone with a comment that has thought to it? Blasphemy!
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:37 pm |
you are smart Rep: 48Joined: 03 Feb 2006 Posts: 16,610 OFFLINE | let’s go on a topic worth debating
EL CHUPACABRA!!! ---
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:38 pm |
The Diabolical One... Rep: 3Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 5,320 OFFLINE | THE GOAT KILLER HE MUST BE REAL... ---
fuckyfuckerfuckingmcfuckfuck69 wrote:
Someone with a comment that has thought to it? Blasphemy!
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:38 pm |
King of the Gamer Army Rep: 38Joined: 22 Nov 2005 Posts: 14,674 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
Zucas wrote:
You people are fools. That article there comes from a very immature and narrow minded person. I mean he openly comes out an criticizes the person yet not what he says. That already shows how much of an idiot that article writer was.
How is he narrowminded?
Disagreement does not equal narrowminded.
Of course it doesn’t why would you ever judge like that. Someone is looking for trouble. I for one have watched the entire Loose Change videos and I don’t believe they are the actual truth but they do pose a question of how truthful the government was with us about the events that occurred at 9/11.
And the writer of that article is quite narrowminded. He doesn’t look at all the other sides yet simply bashes the writer and what he says. That shows narrowmindness and immaturity and desperation to prove a point that he has no sources to back up with. If you say it’s my disagreement that makes me think he’s narrowminded then you are judging way to early.
I’m merely closing in on you.
Bashing down on what 1 guy says and using rebuttals aren’t narrowminded.
Also, he claims to be a conspiracy nut so that is definitely the other side.
Also, those conspiracy theories about 9/11 have no proof and the fact that they have a habit of getting their info wrong is more than enough to count them as unreliable.
Your closing in on me is a sign of desperation. If you know any better you’d think before discussing this topic. I know more than you on this topic as I know the 9-11 story proclaimed by the media and I’ve watched the Loose Change videos. OPENLY I might add. Actually it was gg over the summer who brought the videos up about it and I was angry at first and didn’t want to watch cause I’m very strong about the event. But you watch it, openly I might add for new ideas, and it changes your thoughts about everything. It’s like you’d only known a little of the story and this guy just opens up the other door to show you everything.
The conspiracy is fishy indeed but not more fishy than the entire 9-11 itself. I know this is hard for people to take. It’s like one day someone coming out and proving Jesus Christ isn’t the son of god. I mean it’s hard to think as even ever being true but watching it is something we all need to do. Openly talking on this forum, as all you have done, without ever watching the video, seriously and openly, shows what the American media has turned you into. I have no more to say to people who have a blind opinion on the matter.
Zucas, the point in a debate is to take out the enemy. Closing in is not a sign of “desperation."
It is part of a debate.
This is a sign of desperation.
Zucas wrote:
I have no more to say to people who have a blind opinion on the matter.
You obviously underestimate people and think you know more but judging from what you have said it’s clear that you are outside your domain. You may know more about videogames but when it comes to politics we have you.
Also, a REAL debate does not work like a videogame argument that you have everyday.
Your lack of knowledge in that area os shown by how little know about debate techniques and how a debate works.
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
| |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:38 pm |
UBER 1337 Poster Rep: 10Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 4,411 OFFLINE | Zucas wrote:
Your closing in on me is a sign of desperation. If you know any better you’d think before discussing this topic. I know more than you on this topic as I know the 9-11 story proclaimed by the media and I’ve watched the Loose Change videos. OPENLY I might add. Actually it was gg over the summer who brought the videos up about it and I was angry at first and didn’t want to watch cause I’m very strong about the event. But you watch it, openly I might add for new ideas, and it changes your thoughts about everything. It’s like you’d only known a little of the story and this guy just opens up the other door to show you everything.
So in other words your a follower not a leader?
Yippie Kai Aye, Motherf*cker!! [size=1]post[/post]: Yea: posting just for the sake of posting is wrong, Now posting to get your post count up is a totally different story. | |
| 12 Oct 2006 08:39 pm |
Agent of Chaos Rep: 54Joined: 10 Aug 2005 Posts: 39,967 OFFLINE | Brutus Kicks Ass wrote:
People have to stop beliveing everything they see on t.v. Wait a minute... Didn’t stan say that a bunch of pissed off libyans Crashed the planes? There you go all you doubters. There’s your answer.
NOt everything in this world is black and white. This is just as big as the Kennedy assasination. Do you know the controversy over the conspiracy of possibly Oswald didn’t do it. Don’t be so quick to turn down outside resources. No one in here is saying that the conspiracy is here. All that’s going on in here is an immediate turn down of the world conspiracy.
| |
|
|
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page |
»
Off-Topic
» Was 911 a false flag and a coverup?
