Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Lol what mode were you playing on? Easy?
No, it was on Hard. Not hardest, but hard. It’s that formulaic.
Atresac wrote:
I don’t consider Twilight Princess to be the greatest game ever. I simply say others do. I have not played a single game worthy of the greatest ever. There are games that I think are awesome, but every game has its flaws, and that is why I never claim any game is the best ever. If others want to more power to them.
I know damn well you’ve said twilight princess was an excellent game. You dislike Halo only because you’re against it, and refuse to accept the fact that it’s one of the best and most popular shooters ever made. Why? Because you’re fanboy in denial.
Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Lol what mode were you playing on? Easy?
No, it was on Hard. Not hardest, but hard. It’s that formulaic.
Nice bullshit. There isn’t a Hard mode on Halo 2, dumbass. That tells me right there that you were playing on a low level of difficulty. Pathetic.
Atresac wrote:
I don’t consider Twilight Princess to be the greatest game ever. I simply say others do. I have not played a single game worthy of the greatest ever. There are games that I think are awesome, but every game has its flaws, and that is why I never claim any game is the best ever. If others want to more power to them.
I know damn well you’ve said twilight princess was an excellent game. You dislike Halo only because you’re against it, and refuse to accept the fact that it’s one of the best and most popular shooters ever made. Why? Because you’re fanboy in denial.
An excellent game? Yes. The best game? No. No game that has been released yet, in my opinion, deserves that title. And certainly not Halo. I dislike Halo because it’s over rated. If people didn’t worship it as the greatest game ever I would like it the same, it’s just that I am against it getting the best game ever in the history of ever award. And the only game I am really a fanboy of is Jak, and pretty much only of the story. Halo is a good game, but I have played much, much better.
Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Lol what mode were you playing on? Easy?
No, it was on Hard. Not hardest, but hard. It’s that formulaic.
Nice bullshit. There isn’t a Hard mode on Halo 2, dumbass. That tells me right there that you were playing on a low level of difficulty. Pathetic.
Yeah there is. They just call it legendary or whatever crap they call it. It’s the same as hard, just a different name. Just like Doom has a hardest setting, they just call it Nightmare.
Haven’t played FEAR. Want to. But my PC is and old man who complains whenever you try to play PC games on it. When I get a new PC there a few new games I want to get on it.
Atresac wrote:
I don’t consider Twilight Princess to be the greatest game ever. I simply say others do. I have not played a single game worthy of the greatest ever. There are games that I think are awesome, but every game has its flaws, and that is why I never claim any game is the best ever. If others want to more power to them.
I know damn well you’ve said twilight princess was an excellent game. You dislike Halo only because you’re against it, and refuse to accept the fact that it’s one of the best and most popular shooters ever made. Why? Because you’re fanboy in denial.
An excellent game? Yes. The best game? No. No game that has been released yet, in my opinion, deserves that title. And certainly not Halo. I dislike Halo because it’s over rated. If people didn’t worship it as the greatest game ever I would like it the same, it’s just that I am against it getting the best game ever in the history of ever award. And the only game I am really a fanboy of is Jak, and pretty much only of the story. Halo is a good game, but I have played much, much better.
Does your opinion matter in this case? No. It’s known for a fact that Halo 2 is one of the best and most popular shooters ever made. Plus, it’s one of the fastest selling titles ever to be released in the US. Your opinion is insignificant, and you refuse to accept what is simply true. Also, I hear you call others here fanboys yet apparently it is you who’s a stubborn fanboy who persistently denies undisputable facts. All I’m going to say is you’re pathetic.
Atresac wrote:
I don’t consider Twilight Princess to be the greatest game ever. I simply say others do. I have not played a single game worthy of the greatest ever. There are games that I think are awesome, but every game has its flaws, and that is why I never claim any game is the best ever. If others want to more power to them.
I know damn well you’ve said twilight princess was an excellent game. You dislike Halo only because you’re against it, and refuse to accept the fact that it’s one of the best and most popular shooters ever made. Why? Because you’re fanboy in denial.
An excellent game? Yes. The best game? No. No game that has been released yet, in my opinion, deserves that title. And certainly not Halo. I dislike Halo because it’s over rated. If people didn’t worship it as the greatest game ever I would like it the same, it’s just that I am against it getting the best game ever in the history of ever award. And the only game I am really a fanboy of is Jak, and pretty much only of the story. Halo is a good game, but I have played much, much better.
Does your opinion matter in this case? No. It’s known for a fact that Halo 2 is one of the best and most popular shooters ever made. Plus, it’s one of the fastest selling titles ever to be released in the US. Your opinion is insignificant, and you refuse to accept what is simply true. Also, I hear you call others here fanboys yet apparently it is you who’s a stubborn fanboy who persistently denies undisputable facts. All I’m going to say is you’re pathetic.
Dude, are you an idiot? I am going to say yes. You say my opinion is insignificant, yet guess what? All those reviews? Also just opinion. Just because someone owns a website doesn’t make their opinion any more valid.
“It’s known for a fact that Halo 2 is one of the best and most popular shooters ever made."
Wrong. It is one of the most popular shooters, but the best is solely opinion, so you can’t call it a fact just because some people with a website say it is. Guess what? I have a website! Does that mean if I make a review and call Halo the worst game ever it instantly becomes any more valid? No.
All I’m going to say is that you need to learn the difference between opinion and fact.
Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Too bad you didn’t counter anything I just said. You pretty much agreed with me. Glad we agree then.
maybe you didn’t read the part where they at IGN said “Run to the next room and shoot stuff. Go to the next room and do the same thing. Wouldn’t be any sort of problem if the enemies were more interesting to fight against." and gave that category an 8. Or myabe you missed the part where they gave Halo 2 a 9.8? Or maybe the part where Halo 2 won GOTY from 1up, Gamespy, Gamefly, G-Phoria, etc.
Haven’t played FEAR. Want to. But my PC is and old man who complains whenever you try to play PC games on it. When I get a new PC there a few new games I want to get on it.
F.E.A.R. is awsome. All the slo-mo...and blowing people up in slo-mo....and the grnade explosions are cool...like a shock wave...
Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Lol what mode were you playing on? Easy?
No, it was on Hard. Not hardest, but hard. It’s that formulaic.
Nice bullshit. There isn’t a Hard mode on Halo 2, dumbass. That tells me right there that you were playing on a low level of difficulty. Pathetic.
Why? Because he didn’t adress it’s difficulty by it’s fancy name? That’s like saying someone didn’t play DooM on Nightmare because they called it very hard and not Nightmare.
Brain wrote:
Wow, one article; let’s compare that to the 160 different articles on Gamerankings which say otherwise. Oh, wait, it’s only 159 not counting Gamespot...159 to 1 what a close one
Do you not grasp that is why it is over rated? That so many people overlook serious flaws? That so many people overlook that it is repetitive and requires virtually no effort to beat? That so many people overlook that after the first 10 minutes it was the same 10 minutes over and over and was just boring?
And do you not grasp that all of the most trusted gaming sites across the world rated it an outstanding game? That doesn’t just happen to mediocre games; there is substance there that you prefer to overlook. Repetitive, effortless? Are you sure you’re not talking about Doom there?
I was actually able to make it through an entire level of Halo by just using two controls: run, and shoot.
That’s all. Also there were so many parts of it that were just recycled so you had the same 30 minutes of mediocrity over and over for 10 hours. Oh what fun!
Too bad you didn’t counter anything I just said. You pretty much agreed with me. Glad we agree then.
maybe you didn’t read the part where they at IGN said “Run to the next room and shoot stuff. Go to the next room and do the same thing. Wouldn’t be any sort of problem if the enemies were more interesting to fight against." and gave that category an 8. Or myabe you missed the part where they gave Halo 2 a 9.8? Or maybe the part where Halo 2 won GOTY from 1up, Gamespy, Gamefly, G-Phoria, etc.
Maybe you didn’t read where Gamespy said the same thing about Halo?
In a nutshell, Atresac hates games that everyone likes.
Guess what?! Everyone likes Doom 3! So, Atresac, since you hate Doom 3 now, what do you play? Qubert?
»
Games
» Half-Life 2 vs DooM 3 vs F.E.A.R. vs Halo 2 vs. PREY
