The Lounge, lounge.moviecodec.com
shared movies
Search
FAQ
Login
Register
[ Multipage First 2 3 Last ]

Bookmark and Share
''''Wii being sued... for patent infringment... TWICE!?!'''

The Lounge MovieCodec Navigation » Games Games
Navigation » ''''Wii being sued... for patent infringment... TWICE!?!''' Page Navigation Page Navigation
[Quote] #21
16 Dec 2006 02:22 am
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 44thumbs-down



Joined: 01 Jul 2006
Posts: 4,149
OFFLINE
let me guess Duck Hunter is sueing them?

---
PS3KICKS360 wrote: I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time wink
[Quote] #22
16 Dec 2006 11:31 am
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
Read this if your stupid 2 wrote: let me guess Duck Hunter is sueing them?

wtf?

---
[Quote] #23
16 Dec 2006 11:36 am
Dr. Matt
Rep: 48thumbs-up



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,538
OFFLINE
TrueGamer wrote:
Zucas wrote: These sueings wont' get anywhere. I mean it’s nowhere near as bad as Sony getting sued over the Dualshock controller awhile back.


they’re getting sued for the exact same thing... both nintendo and microsoft... so they both might have to take out the rumble feature, or pay a big sum of money... who knows?


They’re trying to sue for rumble? I don’t know about Microsoft, but Nintendo made and patented their own rumble years ago.

---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”
[Quote] #24
16 Dec 2006 11:42 am
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
so, ya... can i please have a link? its not that i don’t believe you, i just want some more details and such.

---
[Quote] #25
16 Dec 2006 11:46 am
Dr. Matt
Rep: 48thumbs-up



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,538
OFFLINE
kev360 wrote: so, ya... can i please have a link? its not that i don’t believe you, i just want some more details and such.


Well I don’t know a lot about patent numbers and such, but I’ll try to find a link.

---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”
[Quote] #26
16 Dec 2006 11:48 am
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
ramunematt wrote:
kev360 wrote: so, ya... can i please have a link? its not that i don’t believe you, i just want some more details and such.


Well I don’t know a lot about patent numbers and such, but I’ll try to find a link.

k, thx. i was actually thinking the lawsuit (just posting that so eventually truegamer would see it), but that patent would also be nice.

---
Last edited 16 Dec 2006 11:48 am by kev360
[Quote] #27
16 Dec 2006 11:50 am
Dr. Matt
Rep: 48thumbs-up



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,538
OFFLINE
kev360 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
kev360 wrote: so, ya... can i please have a link? its not that i don’t believe you, i just want some more details and such.


Well I don’t know a lot about patent numbers and such, but I’ll try to find a link.

k, thx. i was actually thinking the lawsuit (just posting that so eventually truegamer would see it), but that patent would also be nice.


I think I might need help looking for the link, because whenever I try to search for Nintendo’s patent all these stupid lawsuit articles keep coming up.

---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”
[Quote] #28
16 Dec 2006 11:57 am
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
ramunematt wrote:
kev360 wrote:
ramunematt wrote:
kev360 wrote: so, ya... can i please have a link? its not that i don’t believe you, i just want some more details and such.


Well I don’t know a lot about patent numbers and such, but I’ll try to find a link.

k, thx. i was actually thinking the lawsuit (just posting that so eventually truegamer would see it), but that patent would also be nice.


I think I might need help looking for the link, because whenever I try to search for Nintendo’s patent all these stupid lawsuit articles keep coming up.

k, i’m on it... i see what you mean... right now i’m trying to do the whole immersion vs sony thing, hopping they mention nintendo somewhere along the way. but, i’m just running into dead ends.

---
[Quote] #29
16 Dec 2006 12:05 pm
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
so.. i couldn’t find it...

if you want to look for yourself, go here.

---
Last edited 16 Dec 2006 12:05 pm by kev360
[Quote] #30
16 Dec 2006 12:08 pm
Dr. Matt
Rep: 48thumbs-up



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,538
OFFLINE
Well it’s kind of hard finding the patent for rumble that Nintendo has, but interestingly enough this article says a little something about Nintendo being sued for the Wii remote trigger operation:

Of course, the Nintendo Wii has a trigger-operated controller which is also used as a pointing device. Diagrams from Interlink’s patent bear a passing resemblance to the Wii Remote.

There does seem to be a significant difference between Interlink’s patent and Nintendo’s design, however. Whereas Nintendo’s controller moves an on-screen cursor by moving the actual input device in 3D, Interlink’s patent describes a pointing mechanism that centers around a touch-sensitive pad and buttons, not the movement of the entire unit (“The multiple control elements are responsive to finger pressure to operate switch elements…”).


It looks like Interlink’s patent is pretty different from the Wii remote design. I kind of doubt Interlink will win.

---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”
[Quote] #31
16 Dec 2006 12:21 pm
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
ramunematt wrote: Well it’s kind of hard finding the patent for rumble that Nintendo has, but interestingly enough this article says a little something about Nintendo being sued for the Wii remote trigger operation:

Of course, the Nintendo Wii has a trigger-operated controller which is also used as a pointing device. Diagrams from Interlink’s patent bear a passing resemblance to the Wii Remote.

There does seem to be a significant difference between Interlink’s patent and Nintendo’s design, however. Whereas Nintendo’s controller moves an on-screen cursor by moving the actual input device in 3D, Interlink’s patent describes a pointing mechanism that centers around a touch-sensitive pad and buttons, not the movement of the entire unit (“The multiple control elements are responsive to finger pressure to operate switch elements…”).


It looks like Interlink’s patent is pretty different from the Wii remote design. I kind of doubt Interlink will win.

heh, people sue for the stupidest reasons these days though...

---
[Quote] #32
16 Dec 2006 12:26 pm
Dr. Matt
Rep: 48thumbs-up



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,538
OFFLINE
What gets me is, how can Interlink and whatever that other company sue Nintendo and Microsoft when their patents are described as things not even being used for video games?

---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”
Last edited 16 Dec 2006 12:26 pm by ramunematt
[Quote] #33
16 Dec 2006 12:29 pm
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
ramunematt wrote: What gets me is, how can Interlink and whatever that other company sue Nintendo and Microsoft when their patents are described as things not even being used for video games?

i don’t know... what are they using it for? and, doesn’t that sort of kill the whole “loss of reasonable royalties, reduced sales and/or lost profits as a result of the infringing activities” argument?

---
[Quote] #34
16 Dec 2006 12:44 pm
Dr. Matt
Rep: 48thumbs-up



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,538
OFFLINE
kev360 wrote:
ramunematt wrote: What gets me is, how can Interlink and whatever that other company sue Nintendo and Microsoft when their patents are described as things not even being used for video games?

i don’t know... what are they using it for? and, doesn’t that sort of kill the whole “loss of reasonable royalties, reduced sales and/or lost profits as a result of the infringing activities” argument?


Find me all the patents that those two companies are sueing Nintendo and Microsoft for, I just want to see something.

---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”
[Quote] #35
16 Dec 2006 12:46 pm
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
ramunematt wrote:
kev360 wrote:
ramunematt wrote: What gets me is, how can Interlink and whatever that other company sue Nintendo and Microsoft when their patents are described as things not even being used for video games?

i don’t know... what are they using it for? and, doesn’t that sort of kill the whole “loss of reasonable royalties, reduced sales and/or lost profits as a result of the infringing activities” argument?


Find me all the patents that those two companies are sueing Nintendo and Microsoft for, I just want to see something.

Q_o... the only reason i was able to get the patents i was was becouse i found the nfc, and i think zucas had provided a link to there... but, i can try...

---
[Quote] #36
16 Dec 2006 12:55 pm
hahahahaha
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,061
OFFLINE
well...

anascape patent.

the other one wasn’t so easy. i got like 36 results. i think its probably one of the top 2, but i really can’t tell... i’ll just show you them all.

Interlink Electronics patents.

---
Last edited 16 Dec 2006 12:57 pm by kev360
[Quote] #37
16 Dec 2006 01:02 pm
Dr. Matt
Rep: 48thumbs-up



Joined: 07 Jul 2006
Posts: 14,538
OFFLINE
kev360 wrote: well...

anascape patent.

the other one wasn’t so easy. i got like 36 results. i think its probably one of the top 2, but i really can’t tell... i’ll just show you them all.

Interlink Electronics patents.


Just as I thought. The patents that they are using to sue Nintendo and Microsoft doesn’t even have anything to do with video games, they use those patents for different uses than the Wii remote and Xbox 360 controller. It definitely kills the “they cost us sales” BS.

---
Zeitgeist: Addendum
Join “The Zeitgeist Movement”
[Quote] #38
16 Dec 2006 01:05 pm
The drummer
Rep: 18thumbs-up



Joined: 20 Aug 2005
Posts: 14,615
OFFLINE
I dont know why everyone is even talking about this you know Nintendo is going to win.

---
<iframe src=“http://gamercard.xbox.com/REPLACE-THIS-WITH-YOUR-GAMERTAG.card” scrolling=“no” frameBorder=“0” height=“140” width=“204”>Put your gamertag here too.</iframe>
http://www.myspace.com/linkious
Last edited 16 Dec 2006 01:35 pm by Aaron McKay
[Quote] #39
16 Dec 2006 01:15 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 12thumbs-up



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2,005
OFFLINE
Here’s the actual case filed against both nintendo and microsoft...

---
[Quote] #40
16 Dec 2006 01:19 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 12thumbs-up



Joined: 28 Jan 2006
Posts: 2,005
OFFLINE
This is wut i wanted to show you guys yesterday, but i was at work and they block all websites that has anything to do with games...

---
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page
Moderated by: CPO Fraser, Zucas, Admins, Superusers

Quick Reply

Options
More Options
New Topic

Your name/nick:


Spam prevention! Repeat below:


Your Message




Related Topics

Topic / Topic Starter Last Post Replies Popularity Started
OpenSony Sued over Blu Ray, [ Multipage 1 2 3 ]
CPO Fraser
25 May 2007 11:08 pm
by Online Predator
56025 May 2007
OpenLol SDF is gonna get sued by MS
CPO Fraser
18 Sep 2007 08:54 am
by Di5turbed
13017 Sep 2007
OpenPoor jack is getting sued LOL [ Multipage 1 2 ]
Disturbed -PWII60 -Screw FANBOYS
16 Mar 2007 09:17 pm
by Retcon
22016 Mar 2007
OpenRFOM getting sued by church of England [ Multipage 1 2 ]
SQUiP wuz here
13 Jun 2007 09:46 pm
by SQUiP wuz here
25012 Jun 2007
OpenNintendo rips off a company and gets sued again
Read this if your stupid 22
24 Jul 2007 06:38 pm
by BausMan 117
7024 Jul 2007
OpenSony gettin' sued for the nth time.
the42gamer
31 Jul 2007 01:38 pm
by Demon Slayer
3031 Jul 2007
OpenMicrosoft Sued Over Xbox Outage
bugsbunny
05 Jan 2008 09:43 pm
by Unit_DTH
3005 Jan 2008
Find more related topics...
LOUNGE.MovieCodec.com ©Lundgren IT 2000-8. Privacy Policy - Disclaimer
MVC Network: MovieCodec Forums/Downloads - The Lounge Forums