The Lounge, lounge.moviecodec.com
shared movies
Search
FAQ
Login
Register
[ Multipage < First 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... Last > ]

Bookmark and Share
Sony, say Bye Bye to blu-ray

The Lounge MovieCodec Navigation » Games Games
Navigation » Sony, say Bye Bye to blu-ray Page Navigation Page Navigation
[Quote] #61
06 Jan 2007 08:30 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 15thumbs-up



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 4,282
OFFLINE
Hmm wether this is true or not either way blue-ray could help or hurt the PS3. Both have many reasons in so.
---
PkmPFC:0301-6372-2725 MPHFC:5455-2991-6686
XBL:PlasmaSoldierX SSBFC:0774-3907-7773
[Quote] #62
06 Jan 2007 08:30 pm
King of the Gamer Army
Rep: 38thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 14,674
OFFLINE
NEREVAR117 wrote:
Killa wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote: You aren’t agreeing with me at all. You claim the 360 is outperforming everything when in fact it is really under performing because most of the games don’t look anywhere near as good as they could look. I’m not saying the PS3 graphics are amazing or anything but they are better, even if slightly.


The 360 could do far better then what it is doing now, you know that yes?

The 360 is not using it’s full potential, GoW was using less then 50% of the 360 power, of just one core!

Ps3 graphics are lagging behind though on what Sony has promised us.

Now read what i am about to say VERY carefully.

I havn’t seen a single ps3 game, that has surpassed the best looking 360 games.



You know I like the 360 but this is just to fan boy-ish..even for you.


It’s not fanboyish.

It’s called the truth.


No, it’s fanboyish. Go back to your M$ army. You are still just as fanboyish as ever.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote: Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
[Quote] #63
06 Jan 2007 08:31 pm
Addict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 69thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 32,780
OFFLINE
the21gamer wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote: You aren’t agreeing with me at all. You claim the 360 is outperforming everything when in fact it is really under performing because most of the games don’t look anywhere near as good as they could look. I’m not saying the PS3 graphics are amazing or anything but they are better, even if slightly.


The 360 could do far better then what it is doing now, you know that yes?

The 360 is not using it’s full potential, GoW was using less then 50% of the 360 power, of just one core!

Ps3 graphics are lagging behind though on what Sony has promised us.

Now read what i am about to say VERY carefully.

I havn’t seen a single ps3 game, that has surpassed the best looking 360 games.


I know Gears of War wasn’t using all its power but it was at least pushing it.

The PS3 graphics are lagging behind what Sony promised but compared to the 360 graphics they are better.

Your last statement is stupid. Fall of Man looks better than Lost Planet.


*shakes head*

You’r just not getting are you?
[Quote] #64
06 Jan 2007 08:31 pm
Who Dares Wins
Rep: 25thumbs-up



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 19,034
OFFLINE
RAINBOW SIX: VEGAS

360




PS3



Enough shown
---

Zucas wrote: Gaming is E for everyone.

Zucas wrote: Jk,but seriously.
[Quote] #65
06 Jan 2007 08:32 pm
when you see it, you'll shit bricks
Rep: 33thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,426
OFFLINE
annother sony format, annother failure. with the ps3’s support slowly falling to the 360, without blu-ray, there isn’t much left for them. maybe this cheaper version will help the ps3, maybe not. but, with developer support leaving steadily, and the power difference between the 360 and the ps3 not being that substantial, i see troubles in sony’s future.
---
[Quote] #66
06 Jan 2007 08:34 pm
Addict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 69thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 32,780
OFFLINE
Killa wrote: RAINBOW SIX: VEGAS

360




PS3



Enough shown


No real difference.

And they look like a suped up xbox/ps2 game.
[Quote] #67
06 Jan 2007 08:34 pm
King of the Gamer Army
Rep: 38thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 14,674
OFFLINE
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote: You aren’t agreeing with me at all. You claim the 360 is outperforming everything when in fact it is really under performing because most of the games don’t look anywhere near as good as they could look. I’m not saying the PS3 graphics are amazing or anything but they are better, even if slightly.


The 360 could do far better then what it is doing now, you know that yes?

The 360 is not using it’s full potential, GoW was using less then 50% of the 360 power, of just one core!

Ps3 graphics are lagging behind though on what Sony has promised us.

Now read what i am about to say VERY carefully.

I havn’t seen a single ps3 game, that has surpassed the best looking 360 games.


I know Gears of War wasn’t using all its power but it was at least pushing it.

The PS3 graphics are lagging behind what Sony promised but compared to the 360 graphics they are better.

Your last statement is stupid. Fall of Man looks better than Lost Planet.


*shakes head*

You’r just not getting are you?


Yeah, I don’t get your fanboyism.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote: Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
[Quote] #68
06 Jan 2007 08:34 pm
Who Dares Wins
Rep: 25thumbs-up



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 19,034
OFFLINE
Kev- I have to disagree with you, if this is true Sony could in fact beat out Nintendo and Possible catch up with the 360.
---

Zucas wrote: Gaming is E for everyone.

Zucas wrote: Jk,but seriously.
[Quote] #69
06 Jan 2007 08:34 pm
King of the Gamer Army
Rep: 38thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 14,674
OFFLINE
kev360 wrote: annother sony format, annother failure. with the ps3’s support slowly falling to the 360, without blu-ray, there isn’t much left for them. maybe this cheaper version will help the ps3, maybe not. but, with developer support leaving steadily, and the power difference between the 360 and the ps3 not being that substantial, i see troubles in sony’s future.


Nobody wanted blu-ray to begin with so this’ll help Sony if anything.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote: Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
[Quote] #70
06 Jan 2007 08:35 pm
Who Dares Wins
Rep: 25thumbs-up



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 19,034
OFFLINE
NEREVAR117 wrote:
Killa wrote: RAINBOW SIX: VEGAS

360




PS3



Enough shown


No real difference.

And they look like a suped up xbox/ps2 game.


Yet I just showed you a game that looks better in the PS3 then is the 360 wink
---

Zucas wrote: Gaming is E for everyone.

Zucas wrote: Jk,but seriously.
[Quote] #71
06 Jan 2007 08:35 pm
Addict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 69thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 32,780
OFFLINE
the21gamer wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote: You aren’t agreeing with me at all. You claim the 360 is outperforming everything when in fact it is really under performing because most of the games don’t look anywhere near as good as they could look. I’m not saying the PS3 graphics are amazing or anything but they are better, even if slightly.


The 360 could do far better then what it is doing now, you know that yes?

The 360 is not using it’s full potential, GoW was using less then 50% of the 360 power, of just one core!

Ps3 graphics are lagging behind though on what Sony has promised us.

Now read what i am about to say VERY carefully.

I havn’t seen a single ps3 game, that has surpassed the best looking 360 games.


I know Gears of War wasn’t using all its power but it was at least pushing it.

The PS3 graphics are lagging behind what Sony promised but compared to the 360 graphics they are better.

Your last statement is stupid. Fall of Man looks better than Lost Planet.


*shakes head*

You’r just not getting are you?


Yeah, I don’t get your fanboyism.


You’ve already lost the arguement, you’ll just disagree though.
[Quote] #72
06 Jan 2007 08:37 pm
King of the Gamer Army
Rep: 38thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 14,674
OFFLINE
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote:
NEREVAR117 wrote:
the21gamer wrote: You aren’t agreeing with me at all. You claim the 360 is outperforming everything when in fact it is really under performing because most of the games don’t look anywhere near as good as they could look. I’m not saying the PS3 graphics are amazing or anything but they are better, even if slightly.


The 360 could do far better then what it is doing now, you know that yes?

The 360 is not using it’s full potential, GoW was using less then 50% of the 360 power, of just one core!

Ps3 graphics are lagging behind though on what Sony has promised us.

Now read what i am about to say VERY carefully.

I havn’t seen a single ps3 game, that has surpassed the best looking 360 games.


I know Gears of War wasn’t using all its power but it was at least pushing it.

The PS3 graphics are lagging behind what Sony promised but compared to the 360 graphics they are better.

Your last statement is stupid. Fall of Man looks better than Lost Planet.


*shakes head*

You’r just not getting are you?


Yeah, I don’t get your fanboyism.


You’ve already lost the arguement, you’ll just disagree though.


Your flip-flopping and contradictory statements have lost you the argument as well as your fanboyism.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote: Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
[Quote] #73
06 Jan 2007 08:37 pm
when you see it, you'll shit bricks
Rep: 33thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,426
OFFLINE
Killa wrote: Kev- I have to disagree with you, if this is true Sony could in fact beat out Nintendo and Possible catch up with the 360.

if the cheaper non-blu-ray version is real, yes, it might. that would be the smartest thing sony has done in a LONG time, imo. but, damage is already being done. a lot of series are going over to the 360. i guess it depends on how much cheaper they make it, and how their games hold up when this is over.
---
[Quote] #74
06 Jan 2007 08:37 pm
King of the Gamer Army
Rep: 38thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 14,674
OFFLINE
The 360 version of Rainbow Six is jaggier than the PS3 version, really jaggie, but the lighting on both games do look good though.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote: Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
[Quote] #75
06 Jan 2007 08:37 pm
Who Dares Wins
Rep: 25thumbs-up



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 19,034
OFFLINE
Thinks I that Neveravar just got owned wink and schooled.
---

Zucas wrote: Gaming is E for everyone.

Zucas wrote: Jk,but seriously.
[Quote] #76
06 Jan 2007 08:39 pm
Who Dares Wins
Rep: 25thumbs-up



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 19,034
OFFLINE
kev360 wrote:
Killa wrote: Kev- I have to disagree with you, if this is true Sony could in fact beat out Nintendo and Possible catch up with the 360.

if the cheaper non-blu-ray version is real, yes, it might. that would be the smartest thing sony has done in a LONG time, imo. but, damage is already being done. a lot of series are going over to the 360. i guess it depends on how much cheaper they make it, and how their games hold up when this is over.



Yeah but sony did keep Metal Gear Solid, DMC, and some other key games. those games could help Sony out in the long run but like I said it will only keep them in competition with Nintendo and not with Microsoft.
---

Zucas wrote: Gaming is E for everyone.

Zucas wrote: Jk,but seriously.
[Quote] #77
06 Jan 2007 08:41 pm
Addict (beyond 1337)
Rep: 69thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 32,780
OFFLINE
Right, saying the ps3 is more powerful and can have better graphics is fanboyism. [sarcasm]
[Quote] #78
06 Jan 2007 08:42 pm
Who Dares Wins
Rep: 25thumbs-up



Joined: 24 Dec 2005
Posts: 19,034
OFFLINE
No, not seeing the facts, is fan boy-ism grin
---

Zucas wrote: Gaming is E for everyone.

Zucas wrote: Jk,but seriously.
[Quote] #79
06 Jan 2007 08:43 pm
when you see it, you'll shit bricks
Rep: 33thumbs-up



Joined: 10 Sep 2005
Posts: 15,426
OFFLINE
Killa wrote:
kev360 wrote:
Killa wrote: Kev- I have to disagree with you, if this is true Sony could in fact beat out Nintendo and Possible catch up with the 360.

if the cheaper non-blu-ray version is real, yes, it might. that would be the smartest thing sony has done in a LONG time, imo. but, damage is already being done. a lot of series are going over to the 360. i guess it depends on how much cheaper they make it, and how their games hold up when this is over.



Yeah but sony did keep Metal Gear Solid, DMC, and some other key games. those games could help Sony out in the long run but like I said it will only keep them in competition with Nintendo and not with Microsoft.

they also lost a few key games, and i could see mgs leaving (just a hunch...) also, as for the wii, it really depends on this hype and how long it lasts. if it continues for long enough, then the wii will do very well overall.
---
[Quote] #80
06 Jan 2007 08:43 pm
King of the Gamer Army
Rep: 38thumbs-up



Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 14,674
OFFLINE
kev360 wrote:
Killa wrote: Kev- I have to disagree with you, if this is true Sony could in fact beat out Nintendo and Possible catch up with the 360.

if the cheaper non-blu-ray version is real, yes, it might. that would be the smartest thing sony has done in a LONG time, imo. but, damage is already being done. a lot of series are going over to the 360. i guess it depends on how much cheaper they make it, and how their games hold up when this is over.


They still have a bunch of exclusives left, just not as much as the PS2 had. This really makes me regret getting a 360. I could have stuck with just the Wii and waited for the new version of the PS3.
---
the21gamer wrote:
ramunematt wrote: Did you hear me? I’m a bigger better pussy than you’ll ever be.
Wtf...
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page
Moderated by: CPO Fraser, Zucas, Admins, Superusers

Quick Reply

Options
More Options
New Topic

Your name/nick:


Spam prevention! Repeat below:


Your Message




LOUNGE.MovieCodec.com ©Lundgren IT 2000-8. Privacy Policy - Disclaimer
MVC Network: MovieCodec Forums/Downloads - The Lounge Forums