Just cause your a noob to the Zelda series doesn’t give you a right to criticize it. Either look deeper into it to give it a chance or don’t say anything at all. Otherwise your simply being an ignorant fool. The wii remote was amazingly responsive for me. Most of the times all I had to do was flick my wrist to slash. And the pointing functionality worked amazing. The ending is always as it is in Zelda games. If you knew more about the story you’d respect it more.
Don’t simply destory a game simply becaues you don’t understand it. Go get some background info. I’m sorry this game isn’t like your average other piece of crap game that doesn’t have a deep storyline.
so ur saying that the kingdom hearts series is crap, its way better and theres more sense of conection becuase they have voice acting, and dont say it expands ur imagination cus study shows that if they have a voice u remember them more easily therefor making you more attached
P. Moore wrote:
so ur saying that the kingdom hearts series is crap, its way better and theres more sense of conection becuase they have voice acting, and dont say it expands ur imagination cus study shows that if they have a voice u remember them more easily therefor making you more attached
But Link has been, and always will be, the silent hero. If everybody but Link talked it wouldn’t be right.
Besides, not every game is good with voices, if they remade Final Fantasy VII and gave the characters the same voices they had in Advent Children, I’d kill Square Enix because their voice actors from AC sucked ass.
SA-X wrote:
Not having voice acting makes the game more imaginative, so you can imagine how the person sounds like so there isn’t one way the person talks.
Endings for Zelda always end like that, it’s the end. The next Zelda carries on after the Legend, one chosen by the Gods of the Zelda universe.
They wouldn’t explain it to you, because they assume you know if. Like if you were Link, they wouldn’t explain who the Gods were, since they would assume you knew. Much like Half-Life 2.
Control system was fine. You didn’t move your wrist enough you lazy ass.
Wrong, in Windwaker you can continue roaming around after you neat the game.
I was talking about the story ending, not the end of gameplay.
P.Moore voice actors do not matter for a game to be good. Zelda is Zelda and just because you do not get a game does not mean you should just whine about the ending. I have never had trouble with Zelda TP and it was just pure fun. I played KH and it was not as fun as Zelda in my opinion. Many games have great stories and mayn of them do not have voice actors. Take MP and MP2E those games both had great stories and they had no voice acting. MP3 will have voice acting but it is still the same kind of self-discovery story you need to figure out. Not every story told is straightfoward as you know many require you to make inferences to what you think is going on or to what is going to happen next. Games like Zelda TP when you get cursed by Zant to stay in your wolf form you would know that you need to take Midna to Zelda to get her healed but you would never expect Zelda to give up her life for Midna. Many stories are always surpising so you cannot always expect a mainstream story with games like Zelda or Metroid.
NO they shouldn’t. Understand the hardcore series that is Zelda. This is not a game being made to make new people to the series happy although most new gamers to it will apsolutlely love it if they are looking for a Lord of the Rings type epic game. But there are not many hardcore fans of the game that ever want to here Link talk. I mean I could deal with townspeople talking or something like that but none of the main characters. It jsut wouldnt' be Zelda.
I mean sometimes series shouldn’t expand to standards of future gaming. I mean they just don’t always work. Sometimes advancing throughout most of the series while still sticking too the roots of what made the game legendary is how you expand a series. That is what Zelda: TP did apsolutely perfectly.
Ice Cool wrote:
they should hav voice acting and a bit of R18 stuff to make zelda attracted to older gamers not just little kids
With no voice acting many older aduences have played Zelda regardless of whatever one it may be. They have played windwaker and it was still good they have played OOT and it was still good.
SA-X wrote:
Check the reciever placed on top of the television. Sometimes it needs to be positioned well.
No offense to you or Cid, but make sure you understand the technology. Moore, you obviously have problems with your hardware based on your complaints. A minor jolt is enough for Link to attack. I move my wrist more surfing the web. It is not the sensor bar since the sword is handled via gyroscope. Talk to Nintendo (since you have the update error) or get a new remote.
As for all the other complaints, you merely have no reasonable understanding of Zelda. Play OoT, as it is chronologically the first, and it explains the power of the gods and the Legend better.
But, the voice complaint has merit. While Link should remain silent, I loved Midna’s pseudo-voice and would enjoy something similar in the future but more expanded. But yes, use your imagination a bit more.
P. Moore wrote:
i finished the game and was utterly shocked,
the game sucked
this game that got so many gud reviews by the media sucked so hard, i couldnt beleive how bad they finished the game!
problems
1. controll system, it sucks with the remote and is unresponisve alot of the times and u have to swing wildly if u want him to react straight away.
2. story is not very well explained for new comers at all! it never in the whole game explained who these gods were how zelda and link got their power.
3. ending blows, u cant carry on afterwards to complete some things.
4. not a second of voice acting! made the charecters feel like they had no life, link never spoke, how can u develope a charecter if he doesnt talk or even shows facial reactions
I feel sad for you. I finished the game a week ago and I nearely cried because the game was the greatest game I have ever played.
--- <iframe src=“http://gamercard.xbox.com/REPLACE-THIS-WITH-YOUR-GAMERTAG.card” scrolling=“no” frameBorder=“0” height=“140” width=“204”>Put your gamertag here too.</iframe>
http://www.myspace.com/linkious
P. Moore wrote:
so ur saying that the kingdom hearts series is crap, its way better and theres more sense of conection becuase they have voice acting, and dont say it expands ur imagination cus study shows that if they have a voice u remember them more easily therefor making you more attached
Actually, just about everyone in the universe agrees that Zelda>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kingdom Hearts.
i bet ill love zelda but have hardly played it. once i get a zelda game and have finished it i can properly say ive played and understood ait and cna give positive rasting
SA-X wrote:
Check the reciever placed on top of the television. Sometimes it needs to be positioned well.
No offense to you or Cid, but make sure you understand the technology. Moore, you obviously have problems with your hardware based on your complaints. A minor jolt is enough for Link to attack. I move my wrist more surfing the web. It is not the sensor bar since the sword is handled via gyroscope. Talk to Nintendo (since you have the update error) or get a new remote.
As for all the other complaints, you merely have no reasonable understanding of Zelda. Play OoT, as it is chronologically the first, and it explains the power of the gods and the Legend better.
But, the voice complaint has merit. While Link should remain silent, I loved Midna’s pseudo-voice and would enjoy something similar in the future but more expanded. But yes, use your imagination a bit more.
I had already brought up the fact that his hardware might not be functioning correctly, but he insists that his remotes and sensor bar are working just fine. So seeing as how everybody else doesn’t have these same issues the only logical answer left is the positioning of the sensor bar.
»
Games
» zelda tp finished
