PS3 Graphics vs. Xbox 360 Graphics

Wannabe
Rep: 0



Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 20
OFFLINE

Ubisoft

strychnine in the guacamole
Rep: 47



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 16,020
OFFLINE

I’m only interested in links, evidence, and trustworthy sources. as I said before, as for right now, no matter how you look at it, Xbox 360 is ahead while PS3 hobbles behind! Until further evidence proves otherwise, shut it!

Last edited 20 Jan 2007 09:00 pm by Xtrm Liability

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 22



Joined: 17 Oct 2005
Posts: 2,641
OFFLINE

I think Motor storm is the first ps3 game to really grab full hold of what game makers are able to do now with the ps3 to it’s full advantage now, other ones i’m still skeptical, seems like they were rushed. Right now though, the 360 is better, but i think in the long run, ps3 can get games to look a little better, not by much though.

Last edited 20 Jan 2007 09:16 pm by Hiroshama Nakasaki Is Back

strychnine in the guacamole
Rep: 47



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 16,020
OFFLINE

That’s the general conception people have. I disagree. I think 360 will keep the edge due to Microsoft-developer-tools improving (future XNA versions) which will help developers squeeze every bit of juice out of the 360. Then comes the time to create the Xbox 720 four or 5 years down the road while developers are still dicking around with the PS3 just as they are now with the PS2. By that time, nobody is going to give a rats ass whether “ps3 can get games to look a little better”.

Last edited 20 Jan 2007 10:01 pm by Xtrm Liability

strychnine in the guacamole
Rep: 47



Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 16,020
OFFLINE

bump

------SSDD------
Rep: 36



Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 12,676
OFFLINE

Yes, it looks good, cool teeth, altho i the vids Ive seen, (HD) the detail is lost after the camera pulls back or zooms in. if it had the unreal engine 3, detail wouldn’t be lost from zooming in or looking at it from afar.

------SSDD------
Rep: 36



Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 12,676
OFFLINE

I did, before I learned it was from the same site that said sony would stop using blu-ray, so it’s bullshit.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 3



Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 2,132
OFFLINE

I heard they are exsactly alike in everyway.

Scriptor of Alacritas
Rep: 63



Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 16,947
OFFLINE

I will try to get a hold of some good ps3 pics so dont go away people.

Scriptor of Alacritas
Rep: 63



Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 16,947
OFFLINE

Now can you honestly say that they suck?

Last edited 21 Jan 2007 11:16 pm by Crimson_Blade

Taking noobs to school
Rep: 44



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 16,040
OFFLINE

hmmm some prerendered ones too

Scriptor of Alacritas
Rep: 63



Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 16,947
OFFLINE

Point is? Halo 3 was pre rendered also.

Taking noobs to school
Rep: 44



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 16,040
OFFLINE

no it wasn’t

Scriptor of Alacritas
Rep: 63



Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 16,947
OFFLINE

Alright half pre rendered. It was.

Taking noobs to school
Rep: 44



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 16,040
OFFLINE

Not really.They tool control of Masterchief during E3 and moved him around in the level the trailer was in and it ran in 60 fps but there wasn’t much objects so yea.

UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 3



Joined: 12 May 2006
Posts: 2,132
OFFLINE

They are exsactly alike.

M  v  C   Graphics Designer
Rep: 14



Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 8,080
OFFLINE

i can tell the difference between the pre rendered halo 3 and real time on that first trailer, and the pre rendered just looks way better crisper etc

Taking noobs to school
Rep: 44



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 16,040
OFFLINE

Oh your talking about the prerendered one with the shield grenade

M  v  C   Graphics Designer
Rep: 14



Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Posts: 8,080
OFFLINE

no the first one, when it luks at the big canon thing everything seems to have more contrast and distant things are sharper and the frame rate is smoother.

Taking noobs to school
Rep: 44



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 16,040
OFFLINE

That was real time running on a 360

Last edited 22 Jan 2007 12:02 am by Di5turbed