The Lounge, lounge.moviecodec.com
shared movies
Search
FAQ
Login
Register
[ Multipage < First 2 3 Last > ]

Bookmark and Share
Mitt Romney VS Hillary Clinton

The Lounge MovieCodec Navigation » Off-Topic Off-Topic
Navigation » Mitt Romney VS Hillary Clinton Page Navigation Page Navigation
[Quote] #41
04 Mar 2007 04:06 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
alias wrote:
god wrote: This is proof that alias is my bitch.


there is your proof


Yes, that is proof that you’re God’s bitch but where is the proof you were talking about?
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #42
04 Mar 2007 04:07 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #43
04 Mar 2007 04:08 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.
---
[Quote] #44
04 Mar 2007 04:10 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
Last edited 04 Mar 2007 04:10 pm by Online Predator
[Quote] #45
04 Mar 2007 04:11 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.
---
[Quote] #46
04 Mar 2007 04:13 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #47
04 Mar 2007 04:14 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.
---
[Quote] #48
04 Mar 2007 04:15 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #49
04 Mar 2007 04:16 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.
---
[Quote] #50
04 Mar 2007 04:16 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 3thumbs-up



Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 1,234
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.

exactly
[Quote] #51
04 Mar 2007 04:18 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #52
04 Mar 2007 04:20 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).
---
[Quote] #53
04 Mar 2007 04:21 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).


Yeah, and you failed at using it correctly as you missed the point that had proof.

A biography does not include everything and obviously the oil pipes were not included.

Are you frustrated again?
Learn how to debate properly and you won’t be so frustrated and resort to your kiddy insults as usual.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
Last edited 04 Mar 2007 04:22 pm by Online Predator
[Quote] #54
04 Mar 2007 04:21 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).


Yeah, and you failed at using it correctly as you missed the point that had proof.

A biography does not include everything and obviously the oil pipes were not included.


...BECAUSE THEY NEVER HAPPENED.
---
[Quote] #55
04 Mar 2007 04:24 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).


Yeah, and you failed at using it correctly as you missed the point that had proof.

A biography does not include everything and obviously the oil pipes were not included.


...BECAUSE THEY NEVER HAPPENED.


So anything not on the biography never happened?
The biography doesn’t cover everything.
Way to place everything on a single biography that can be edited by anyone.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #56
04 Mar 2007 04:26 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).


Yeah, and you failed at using it correctly as you missed the point that had proof.

A biography does not include everything and obviously the oil pipes were not included.


...BECAUSE THEY NEVER HAPPENED.


So anything not on the biography never happened?
The biography doesn’t cover everything.
Way to place everything on a single biography that can be edited by anyone.


Way to place your entire argument on one bullshit documentary. But oh shit, what do you know, 99% of the time, Wikipedia is right! I’ll be damned.
---
[Quote] #57
04 Mar 2007 04:28 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).


Yeah, and you failed at using it correctly as you missed the point that had proof.

A biography does not include everything and obviously the oil pipes were not included.


...BECAUSE THEY NEVER HAPPENED.


So anything not on the biography never happened?
The biography doesn’t cover everything.
Way to place everything on a single biography that can be edited by anyone.


Way to place your entire argument on one bullshit documentary. But oh shit, what do you know, 99% of the time, Wikipedia is right! I’ll be damned.


How do you know it’s right 99% of the time with the all spamming and so on? Hhmm? Is that another one of your facts you pulled out of your ass as usual?

You have no proof that the document is bullshit so preach on about bullshit.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #58
04 Mar 2007 04:30 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep: 4thumbs-up



Joined: 16 Feb 2007
Posts: 3,024
OFFLINE
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).


Yeah, and you failed at using it correctly as you missed the point that had proof.

A biography does not include everything and obviously the oil pipes were not included.


...BECAUSE THEY NEVER HAPPENED.


So anything not on the biography never happened?
The biography doesn’t cover everything.
Way to place everything on a single biography that can be edited by anyone.


Way to place your entire argument on one bullshit documentary. But oh shit, what do you know, 99% of the time, Wikipedia is right! I’ll be damned.


How do you know it’s right 99% of the time with the all spamming and so on? Hhmm? Is that another one of your facts you pulled out of your ass as usual?

You have no proof that the document is bullshit so preach on about bullshit.


You have no proof it’s not bullshit do ya?

Oh shit, there’s your own logic being used against you again! What a bitch huh?

I feel I’ve done my part in making you look like a dumbass, as usual. So before you give me high blood pressure (permanently [again]), I am going to leave you arguing with yourself.

Feel free to think you won though.
---
[Quote] #59
04 Mar 2007 04:32 pm
The one and only OP
Rep: 27thumbs-up



Joined: 28 May 2006
Posts: 9,100
OFFLINE
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote:
Online Predator wrote:
Zirnitra wrote: Where’s your proof that Bill Clinton put oil pipes in Iraq? One video as opposed to a biography on the man?

If that’s your proof your argument is faulty.


The biography has no counter and you just keep saying biography but where is it? On wikipedia?


Yes, on wikipedia.

The biography doesn’t need a counter if it never happened.

I don’t see any counter to my claim that GW has sex with moneys on GW’s biography.


People can go on and edit what’s on wikipedia just like that.

Whoever said I am arguing whether or not Bush had sex with monkeys?

I am arguing that Clinton is far from being the best president.


Yeah, and things on wikipedia that are bullshit are cleaned up instantly.


So Bush having sex with monkey’s is cleaned up already? Possibly.

Though, it makes no mention of the oil pipes so what is there to clean up if it doesn’t go there?
Though, even that is not bullshit.


Your only proof that it isn’t bullshit is some crappy documentary that tries to make itself seem factual to gullible people like you.


And your only 'proof' of that is...shit, you don’t have proof.


the fact that it wasn’t on wikipedia’s page on him.

If it was the truth, it would be on the page.


So because there is no mention of Clinton taking a shit daily on the page that means Clinton doesn’t shit? Nice one.


Wow, way to be a dumbass.

It is a biography of his time as president. Not to mention that is the same card I used on you earlier (it doesn’t say Clinton didn’t put the oil pipes).


Yeah, and you failed at using it correctly as you missed the point that had proof.

A biography does not include everything and obviously the oil pipes were not included.


...BECAUSE THEY NEVER HAPPENED.


So anything not on the biography never happened?
The biography doesn’t cover everything.
Way to place everything on a single biography that can be edited by anyone.


Way to place your entire argument on one bullshit documentary. But oh shit, what do you know, 99% of the time, Wikipedia is right! I’ll be damned.


How do you know it’s right 99% of the time with the all spamming and so on? Hhmm? Is that another one of your facts you pulled out of your ass as usual?

You have no proof that the document is bullshit so preach on about bullshit.


You have no proof it’s not bullshit do ya?

Oh shit, there’s your own logic being used against you again! What a bitch huh?

I feel I’ve done my part in making you look like a dumbass, as usual. So before you give me high blood pressure (permanently [again]), I am going to leave you arguing with yourself.

Feel free to think you won though.


My proof is the documentary.

Oh shit, there’s your own words being used against you again! What a bitch huh?

Feel free to think you won though.

Understand logic before you counter it.
---
Club: Ramunematt Is A Fucking Dumbass
[Quote] #60
04 Mar 2007 05:56 pm
Elmo
Guest
I would vote Romney because Clinton has been known not to be trusted.
Previous Page - Post Reply - Next Page
Moderated by: Admins, Superusers

Quick Reply

Options
More Options
New Topic

Your name/nick:


Spam prevention! Repeat below:


Your Message




LOUNGE.MovieCodec.com ©Lundgren IT 2000-8. Privacy Policy - Disclaimer
MVC Network: MovieCodec Forums/Downloads - The Lounge Forums