And nukes are scarier...imagine you’re just sitting there, then there’s a blinding flash, and once it clears, there’s a mushroom cloud. Then all you can do is wait for the wave of destruction to(hopefully) kill you.
A threat of nuclear weaponry is indeed a scary one, and the only two cities in the world to have experienced something so terrible are Japan’s Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the second world war, so the best way to analyze the threat is to look back in history.
yeah hiroshima. japanese dint know what tha fuck hi em, they dint know what a a-bomb was. imagine a fuckin city jus getting leveled.
now one bomb can take out a country. millions of people.
why tha fuck are people doing this eh?
I agree to the fact that nukes are a matter of checks and balances and that countries without them are basically not even a factor of where this world is headed, and forget about anyone removing their nukes, it would be one of those “on the count of 3 we both drop the weapons” kind of thing. But you never know, there are some crazy leaders out there that dont give a damn about their economy or their people. Its a matter of how much you have to gain or lose
Supposedly, if there is a nuclear war, the only ones to survive will be the"cockroaches”, simply because of the destructive capability of modern nukes. If the predictions are right, then when WW3 happens, it will involve heavy use of the Nuclear Arsenals around the world. If that is true, then when the war is over, the earth will enter a nuclear winter due to the obstruction of the sun by the multiple dust clouds that clog the Earth’s atmosphere.
DARKSLAYER07 wrote:
Supposedly, if there is a nuclear war, the only ones to survive will be the"cockroaches”, simply because of the destructive capability of modern nukes. If the predictions are right, then when WW3 happens, it will involve heavy use of the Nuclear Arsenals around the world. If that is true, then when the war is over, the earth will enter a nuclear winter due to the obstruction of the sun by the multiple dust clouds that clog the Earth’s atmosphere.
Di5turbed wrote:
Yea we got ways to counter Nuclear weapons...So GLOBAL WARMING
The US already has an anti-missile program going on already, and we have already succesfully shot down a few test missiles. The funny thing is, Canada didn’t sign with us for the anti-missile program, so with crap on our borders shooting down missiles, the missiles will land in Canada
And a few years ago the Canadians were laughing at us like “hahaha that won’t work!"
Di5turbed wrote:
Yea we got ways to counter Nuclear weapons...So GLOBAL WARMING
The US already has an anti-missile program going on already, and we have already succesfully shot down a few test missiles. The funny thing is, Canada didn’t sign with us for the anti-missile program, so with crap on our borders shooting down missiles, the missiles will land in Canada
And a few years ago the Canadians were laughing at us like “hahaha that won’t work!“
I don’t fear either. Global warming is false, we’re just going through a heating phase. And besides, if a nuke would ever be launched, the whole world would be destroyed because of alliances. We would all be dead.
»
Off-Topic
» Global Warming vs Nuclear Weapons. Which do you fear more?
