bant car dice wrote: White nationalism is a form of ethnic nationalism, advocating a racial definition (or redefinition) of the national group. It is opposed to multiculturalism - but also to a monocultural national identity, if that would include people regarded as 'non-white'. White nationalism is not relevant in nations where the majority is clearly not white, as in most of Africa: there are comparable movements in South Africa, but they are secessionist. Although the term is recent, there is a long tradition of 'white' racial nationalism in English-speaking countries, for instance in the definition of the United States as a White Anglo-Saxon nation, and in the White Australia policy. White nationalism has a generally disreputable image, but its core doctrines are no different from those of the official nationalism underlying nation-states, all of which confer citizenship on a hereditary basis, and limit immigration by some or all non-national ethnic groups.

The term originated as a self-description by some racialist right-wing groups, primarily in the United States (and to a lesser extent in Canada, Britain, and Australia), to describe their belief in a racially defined collective identity of white or Caucasian people. That self-description was inspired by the generic term black nationalism, for movements promoting a ‘Black’ cultural and social identity in the United States in the 1960’s and 1970’s — later movements emphasised ‘African’ rather than ‘Black’ as an identity reference. 'White nationalism' therefore combines elements of American racial nationalism and a race-based identity politics.

bant car dice wrote: White nationalism is a form of ethnic nationalism, advocating a racial definition (or redefinition) of the national group. It is opposed to multiculturalism - but also to a monocultural national identity, if that would include people regarded as 'non-white'. White nationalism is not relevant in nations where the majority is clearly not white, as in most of Africa: there are comparable movements in South Africa, but they are secessionist. Although the term is recent, there is a long tradition of 'white' racial nationalism in English-speaking countries, for instance in the definition of the United States as a White Anglo-Saxon nation, and in the White Australia policy. White nationalism has a generally disreputable image, but its core doctrines are no different from those of the official nationalism underlying nation-states, all of which confer citizenship on a hereditary basis, and limit immigration by some or all non-national ethnic groups.

The term originated as a self-description by some racialist right-wing groups, primarily in the United States (and to a lesser extent in Canada, Britain, and Australia), to describe their belief in a racially defined collective identity of white or Caucasian people. That self-description was inspired by the generic term black nationalism, for movements promoting a ‘Black’ cultural and social identity in the United States in the 1960’s and 1970’s — later movements emphasised ‘African’ rather than ‘Black’ as an identity reference. 'White nationalism' therefore combines elements of American racial nationalism and a race-based identity politics.

THE_PAIN wrote:


BTW .. the term “Aryan” .. is Indo-Iranian .... there are almost a 100,000 ppl in India with tht as their first name i kid you not

bant car dice wrote:
Im talking about the blonde hair, blue eyes, and white skin Aryan.

bant car dice wrote:
Meh I can pretend I am german ;]