03 May 2007 07:24 am
Entree
Rep:
0 Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 7
OFFLINE
I WAN’T A FUCKING GOOD REASON WHY YOU BANNED MY ACCOUNT. I HAD NO FUCKING WARNING OR FUCK ALL. I’M GETTING TIRED OF YOU FUCKING SILLY ASS MODERATORS THINKING THAT YOU ARE THE FUCKING RULES. NOW WHAT SILLY FUCKER BANNED ME. OR AIN’T YOU GOT THE FUCKING ASS TO COME FORWARD.
03 May 2007 07:34 am
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep:
42 Joined: 01 Jul 2006
Posts: 4,149
OFFLINE
L U C I F E R wrote:
I WAN’T A FUCKING GOOD REASON WHY YOU BANNED MY ACCOUNT. I HAD NO FUCKING WARNING OR FUCK ALL. I’M GETTING TIRED OF YOU FUCKING SILLY ASS MODERATORS THINKING THAT YOU ARE THE FUCKING RULES. NOW WHAT SILLY FUCKER BANNED ME. OR AIN’T YOU GOT THE FUCKING ASS TO COME FORWARD.
It was probely Cid or weeman there known for doing things like that
---PS3KICKS360 wrote:
I am a celebrity for all those gay porno’s I do in my spare time
03 May 2007 07:36 am
Entree
Rep:
0 Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 7
OFFLINE
WELL I WANT A REASONABLE ANSWER TO WHY MY ACCOUNT WAS BANNED. AND WHY I WASN’T “WARNED” FIRST ABOUT WHAT FUCKING “RULE” I WAS BREAKING.
03 May 2007 07:41 am
The Dog-Mod!
Rep:
49 Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 18,544
Eh??? When did this happen?
---
03 May 2007 12:06 pm
Guardian of MvC
Rep:
74 Joined: 06 Jan 2006
Posts: 43,974
OFFLINE
What was your other account and when was it banned? I wasn’t on after about 8 PM last night and now is the first time I’ve been on today.
*edit*
NVM, I see Etain has already confessed to banning you.
Honestly, you bumped up 19 really old topics, it’s spam and reason enough for a ban. I don’t know where your warning is though as I wasn’t here.
---
^ made by Sawah <3Last edited 03 May 2007 12:13 pm by Cid
03 May 2007 01:47 pm
go awai
Rep:
12 Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 11,113
OFFLINE
I don’t think 19 topic revivals deserves a warning.
---
03 May 2007 03:15 pm 03 May 2007 05:28 pm
The Dog-Mod!
Rep:
49 Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 18,544
THE_PAIN wrote:
THIS DEMANDS WAR !! gET OUT THE PANZERS !!
HAH you are funny. You know whats gonna happen if you and the others start breaking the rules don’t cha........bannings. pure and simple.
I suggest you actually prove your supposed intellect by reading this thread.
http://www.moviecodec.com/topics/30239p1.html
---
Last edited 03 May 2007 05:29 pm by firewolf81
03 May 2007 05:30 pm
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep:
21 Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 4,095
OFFLINE
ban = easy to bypass
---
03 May 2007 08:31 pm
Wannabe
Rep:
0 Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 80
OFFLINE
Etain gave you a 24-hour for spamish reasons. Don’t get so excited, it’s not like you can’t post anymore.
If it was an ip ban, that’s when you could get a little upset. But right now just try to calm down, and pretend that you deserved the ban. Ok?
--- — Son of God. So who’s son are you?
— Wanna get saved (wesleyan-baptist style)? Send me a PM!Last edited 03 May 2007 08:49 pm by Proffessor_gad
03 May 2007 08:42 pm
Strange little girl
Rep:
37 Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 6,802
What? I gave him a 24 hour ban which is already over which is why his complaining was so ridiculous.
---
03 May 2007 08:45 pm
Wannabe
Rep:
0 Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 27
OFFLINE
---Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
There’s nothing wrong with reviving old topics if their post is relevant...
03 May 2007 08:49 pm
Wannabe
Rep:
0 Joined: 23 Jan 2006
Posts: 80
OFFLINE
Oops. My bad. It really was a 24-hour ban. I guess they only have full bans and 24-hour bans (:
--- — Son of God. So who’s son are you?
— Wanna get saved (wesleyan-baptist style)? Send me a PM!
03 May 2007 08:55 pm
Strange little girl
Rep:
37 Joined: 03 May 2006
Posts: 6,802
Nope wrong again . We have 24 hour, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and perma.
---
03 May 2007 09:25 pm
Wannabe
Rep:
0 Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 27
OFFLINE
Etain wrote:
Nope wrong again
. We have 24 hour, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and perma.
Ohhh So TemptinG !!!
..... Do TheY Come With A Sugar CoatinG !!!
They All Look ....... Ohhh Ever So YUMMY To Me !!!
*MoutH StartS To Water}
*Presses Face Up AgainsT The Glass)
Maybe I’ll Try One LateR
---Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
There’s nothing wrong with reviving old topics if their post is relevant...
05 May 2007 11:27 am 05 May 2007 11:28 am
UBER 1337 Poster
Rep:
21 Joined: 18 Apr 2007
Posts: 4,095
OFFLINE
---
05 May 2007 11:33 am
The lonely planet
Rep:
32 Joined: 16 Mar 2007
Posts: 11,616
OFFLINE
you gotta love it
— — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
---
05 May 2007 11:37 am 06 May 2007 05:41 am
Wannabe
Rep:
0 Joined: 03 May 2007
Posts: 27
OFFLINE
wohin ging die Redefreiheit? sie haben den ganzen harmlosen Spass auf hier weggenommen? bringen Sie die guten Tage zurück, die ich sage. was Sie DER_SCHMERZ sagt ?
---Bjarne Lundgren wrote:
There’s nothing wrong with reviving old topics if their post is relevant...
Post Reply - Next Page